Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement: a prospective, randomised controlled study of the acrobot system.

We performed a prospective, randomised controlled trial of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty comparing the performance of the Acrobot system with conventional surgery. A total of 27 patients (28 knees) awaiting unicompartmental knee arthroplasty were randomly allocated to have the operation performed conventionally or with the assistance of the Acrobot. The primary outcome measurement was the angle of tibiofemoral alignment in the coronal plane, measured by CT. Other secondary parameters were evaluated and are reported. All of the Acrobot group had tibiofemoral alignment in the coronal plane within 2 degrees of the planned position, while only 40% of the conventional group achieved this level of accuracy. While the operations took longer, no adverse effects were noted, and there was a trend towards improvement in performance with increasing accuracy based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and American Knee Society scores at six weeks and three months. The Acrobot device allows the surgeon to reproduce a pre-operative plan more reliably than is possible using conventional techniques which may have clinical advantages.

[1]  J W Goodfellow,et al.  The Oxford Knee for unicompartmental osteoarthritis. The first 103 cases. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  P. Hernigou,et al.  Alignment Influences Wear in the Knee after Medial Unicompartmental Arthroplasty , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  D. Beard,et al.  Accelerated recovery for unicompartmental knee replacement--a feasibility study. , 2002, The Knee.

[4]  J. Galante,et al.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  P. Lotke,et al.  Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  T P Andriacchi,et al.  Factors influencing walking and stairclimbing following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. , 1986, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  D. Dennis,et al.  Correlation Between Condylar Lift-Off and Femoral Component Alignment , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  M. Janeček,et al.  Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation , 2003, International Orthopaedics.

[9]  M. Nogler,et al.  Contamination Risk of the Surgical Team Through ROBODOC®’s High-Speed Cutter , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  David W. Murray,et al.  The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty , 1998 .

[11]  C. Boéri,et al.  Computer-assisted implantation of total knee prostheses: a case-control comparative study with classical instrumentation. , 2001, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[12]  L. Lidgren,et al.  The Swedish knee arthroplasty register. A nation-wide study of 30,003 knees 1976-1992. , 1994, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[13]  C. Bach,et al.  Excessive heat generation during cutting of cement in the Robodoc hip-revision procedure , 2001, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[14]  J. Aubaniac,et al.  Modern Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with Cement: A Three to Ten-Year Follow-up Study , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  P Cartier,et al.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery. 10-year minimum follow-up period. , 1996, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[16]  R Y Liow,et al.  The reliability of the American Knee Society Score , 2000, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[17]  Peter Loan,et al.  Computer-Assisted Navigation in Total Knee Replacement: Results of an Initial Experience in Thirty-five Patients , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  D. Zurakowski,et al.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[19]  D. Shakespeare,et al.  Varus/valgus alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. , 2003, Knee (Oxford).

[20]  J. Jenny,et al.  Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation , 2002, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[21]  L. Dorr,et al.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  W. Bargar,et al.  Primary and Revision Total Hip Replacement Using the Robodoc® System , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  R. White,et al.  Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Postoperative alignment and its influence on overall results. , 1987, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  Michael Nogler,et al.  Navigation Improves Accuracy of Rotational Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[25]  A. Price,et al.  Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[26]  Cyril Boeri,et al.  Accuracy of implantation of a unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty with 2 different instrumentations: a case-controlled comparative study. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[27]  R. Kober,et al.  Technique and first clinical results of robot-assisted total knee replacement. , 2002, The Knee.

[28]  J. Galante,et al.  Miller-Galante unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 2- to 5-year follow-up evaluations. , 1995, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[29]  R. K. Mielke,et al.  [Navigation in knee endoprosthesis implantation--preliminary experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation technique]. , 2001, Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete.

[30]  D. Cox,et al.  Cost comparison between bilateral simultaneous, staged, and unilateral total joint arthroplasty. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[31]  N. Bellamy,et al.  Validation study of WOMAC : a health status instrument for measuring clinically-important patient-relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis , 1988 .

[32]  K. An,et al.  Double Level Osteotomy of the Knee: A Method to Retain Joint-Line Obliquity Clinical Results , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[33]  Ulrich Clemens,et al.  Experience using the latest OrthoPilot TKA software: a comparative study. , 2003, Surgical technology international.

[34]  John H. Newman,et al.  Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. , 1998 .

[35]  S. J. Harris,et al.  The first clinical application of a "hands-on" robotic knee surgery system. , 2001, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[36]  R. Emerson,et al.  Comparison of a Mobile With a Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Implant , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.