Structural performance of a parked wind turbine tower subjected to strong ground motions

Abstract The objective of this paper is to evaluate the structural performance of a typical wind turbine tower subjected to strong ground motions. A detailed finite element model of an 80 m wind turbine tower was developed and subjected to strong ground motions. Two sets of input ground motions were used: one with pulse-type near-fault motions and the other one with far-fault motions. The structural performance of the wind turbine tower was investigated through seismic fragility analysis. The potential limit states were defined as global buckling of the tower, first occurrence of yielding, overturning of the foundation and permanent deformation of the tower. It was found that the wind turbine tower investigated in this study is most vulnerable to the overturning in the event of an earthquake. Yielding of the tower is the second most probable failure mechanism, which is followed by development of permanent deformation and global buckling of the tower. Similar trends in the failure mechanism were observed for both near-fault and far-fault ground motions.

[1]  Dimitrios G. Lignos,et al.  Fragility functions for pre-Northridge welded steel moment-resisting beam-to-column connections , 2012 .

[2]  J. Bray,et al.  Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region , 2004 .

[3]  Howard H. M. Hwang,et al.  Generation of hazard-consistent fragility curves , 1994 .

[4]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach , 2006 .

[5]  Nestor A Agbayani.  A Technical Overview of ASCE/AWEA RP2011: Recommended Practice for Compliance of Large Land-based Wind Turbine Support Structures , 2014 .

[6]  Elena Nuta,et al.  Seismic Analysis of Steel Wind Turbine Towers in the Canadian Environment , 2010 .

[7]  Andrew T. Myers,et al.  Aerodynamic Damping and Seismic Response of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Towers , 2014 .

[8]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines , 2002 .

[9]  Howard H. M. Hwang,et al.  Probabilistic Damage Analysis of Structures , 1990 .

[10]  Ahmed Elgamal,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Seismic Response of a 65 kW Wind Turbine , 2009 .

[11]  Dimitrios G. Lignos,et al.  Fragility Assessment of Reduced Beam Section Moment Connections , 2010 .

[12]  Vitelmo V. Bertero,et al.  Uncertainties in Establishing Design Earthquakes , 1987 .

[13]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Simplified Earthquake Analysis of Structures with Foundation Uplift , 1985 .

[14]  Andrew Peter Voth,et al.  Branch Plate-to-circular Hollow Structural Section Connections , 2011 .

[15]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Simplified Earthquake Analysis of Multistory Structures With Foundation Uplift , 1985 .

[16]  Marvin W. Halling,et al.  Near-Source Ground Motion and its Effects on Flexible Buildings , 1995 .

[17]  B. Ellingwood,et al.  Fragility assessment of building structural systems in Mid‐America , 2007 .

[18]  J. W. Meek,et al.  Effects of Foundation Tipping on Dynamic Response , 1975 .

[19]  Sandia Report,et al.  Assessment of Wind Turbine Seismic Risk: Existing Literature and Simple Study of Tower Moment Demand , 2009 .

[20]  P. Somerville.  Magnitude scaling of the near fault rupture directivity pulse , 2003 .

[21]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Quantitative Classification of Near-Fault Ground Motions Using Wavelet Analysis , 2007 .

[22]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Efficient Analytical Fragility Function Fitting Using Dynamic Structural Analysis , 2015 .

[23]  P Maißer,et al.  Seismic response analysis of wind turbine towers including soil-structure interaction , 2006 .

[24]  Peter Matic,et al.  Numerically predicting ductile material behavior from tensile specimen response , 1985 .

[25]  Jason Jonkman,et al.  Estimation of Seismic Load Demand for a Wind Turbine in the Time Domain: Preprint , 2010 .

[26]  George D. Hatzigeorgiou,et al.  Static, seismic and stability analyses of a prototype wind turbine steel tower , 2002 .

[27]  George N. Stamatopoulos,et al.  Response of a wind turbine subjected to near-fault excitation and comparison with the Greek Aseismic Code provisions , 2013 .

[28]  Vikram Pakrashi,et al.  Fragility analysis of steel and concrete wind turbine towers , 2012 .

[29]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  Effects of Fling Step and Forward Directivity on Seismic Response of Buildings , 2006 .

[30]  W. D. Iwan,et al.  DRIFT SPECTRUM: MEASURE OF DEMAND FOR EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS , 1997 .

[31]  J. Schaarup.  Guidelines for design of wind turbines , 2001 .

[32]  George D. Hatzigeorgiou,et al.  Ductility demand spectra for multiple near- and far-fault earthquakes , 2010 .

[33]  J. Packer,et al.  Methodology for seismic risk assessment for tubular steel wind turbine towers: application to Canadian seismic environment , 2011 .

[34]  S. Farid Ghahari,et al.  STUDY ON ELASTIC RESPONSE OF STRUCTURES TO NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTIONS THROUGH RECORD DECOMPOSITION , 2010 .

[35]  Luis E. Suarez,et al.  Seismic Analysis of Wind Turbines , 2014 .

[36]  Dimitrios G. Lignos,et al.  An efficient method for estimating the collapse risk of structures in seismic regions , 2013 .

[37]  Babak Alavi,et al.  Behavior of moment‐resisting frame structures subjected to near‐fault ground motions , 2004 .

[38]  S. Mahin,et al.  Aseismic design implications of near‐fault san fernando earthquake records , 1978 .

[39]  Abbie B. Liel,et al.  The effect of near‐fault directivity on building seismic collapse risk , 2012 .

[40]  A. Chopra,et al.  Comparing response of SDF systems to near‐fault and far‐fault earthquake motions in the context of spectral regions , 2001 .

[41]  Ivo Caliò,et al.  Large displacement behaviour of a structural model with foundation uplift under impulsive and earthquake excitations , 2003 .