Optimized Suspension Trapping Method for Phosphoproteomics Sample Preparation

A successful mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics analysis relies on effective sample preparation strategies. Suspension trapping (S-Trap) is a novel, rapid, and universal method of sample preparation that is increasingly applied in bottom-up proteomics studies. However, the performance of the S-Trap protocol for phosphoproteomics studies is unclear. In the existing S-Trap protocol, the addition of phosphoric acid (PA) and methanol buffer creates a fine protein suspension to capture proteins on a filter and is a critical step for subsequent protein digestion. Herein, we demonstrate that this addition of PA is detrimental to downstream phosphopeptide enrichment, rendering the standard S-Trap protocol suboptimal for phosphoproteomics. In this study, the performance of the S-Trap digestion for proteomics and phosphoproteomics is systematically evaluated in large-scale and small-scale samples. The results of this comparative analysis show that an optimized S-Trap approach, where trifluoroacetic acid is substituted for PA, is a simple and effective method to prepare samples for phosphoproteomics. Our optimized S-Trap protocol is applied to extracellular vesicles to demonstrate superior sample preparation workflow for low-abundance, membrane-rich samples.

[1]  A. Brazma,et al.  The PRIDE database resources in 2022: a hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences , 2021, Nucleic Acids Res..

[2]  F. White,et al.  Phosphoproteomics: a valuable tool for uncovering molecular signaling in cancer cells , 2021, Expert review of proteomics.

[3]  A. Heck,et al.  HLA-B and cysteinylated ligands distinguish the antigen presentation landscape of extracellular vesicles , 2021, Communications biology.

[4]  B. Döme,et al.  Proteomic Workflows for High-Quality Quantitative Proteome and Post-Translational Modification Analysis of Clinically Relevant Samples from Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Archives. , 2020, Journal of proteome research.

[5]  M. Ye,et al.  WIDENING THE BOTTLENECK OF PHOSPHOPROTEOMICS: EVOLVING STRATEGIES FOR PHOSPHOPEPTIDE ENRICHMENT. , 2020, Mass spectrometry reviews.

[6]  Christopher B. Howard,et al.  S-Trap eliminates cell culture media polymeric surfactants for effective proteomic analysis of mammalian cell bioreactor supernatants. , 2020, Journal of proteome research.

[7]  Yasset Perez-Riverol,et al.  The ProteomeXchange consortium in 2020: enabling ‘big data’ approaches in proteomics , 2019, Nucleic Acids Res..

[8]  A. Heck,et al.  High-Throughput Assessment of Kinome-wide Activation States , 2019, Cell systems.

[9]  J. Wesseling,et al.  Proteomic profiling of extracellular vesicles allows for human breast cancer subtyping , 2019, Communications Biology.

[10]  G. Raposo,et al.  Extracellular vesicles: a new communication paradigm? , 2019, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[11]  B. Liu,et al.  Improved Methodology for Sensitive and Rapid Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Adult‐Derived Mouse Microglia: Application to a Novel In Vitro Mouse Microglial Cell Model , 2019, Proteomics.

[12]  T. Park,et al.  Investigating Phosphorylation Patterns of the Ion Channel TRPM7 Using Multiple Extraction and Enrichment Techniques Reveals New Phosphosites , 2019, Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[13]  K. Nelson,et al.  Self-Assembled STrap for Global Proteomics and Salivary Biomarker Discovery. , 2019, Journal of proteome research.

[14]  Y. Levin,et al.  Suspension Trapping (S-Trap) Is Compatible with Typical Protein Extraction Buffers and Detergents for Bottom-Up Proteomics. , 2019, Journal of proteome research.

[15]  Jing Xu,et al.  Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines , 2018, Journal of Extracellular Vesicles.

[16]  Sean J. Humphrey,et al.  High-throughput and high-sensitivity phosphoproteomics with the EasyPhos platform , 2018, Nature Protocols.

[17]  Elizabeth T. Anderson,et al.  Evaluation of six sample preparation procedures for qualitative and quantitative proteomics analysis of milk fat globule membrane , 2018, Electrophoresis.

[18]  Yanbao Yu,et al.  S-Trap, an Ultrafast Sample-Preparation Approach for Shotgun Proteomics. , 2018, Journal of proteome research.

[19]  A. Hummon,et al.  Comparison of In-Solution, FASP, and S-Trap Based Digestion Methods for Bottom-Up Proteomic Studies. , 2018, Journal of proteome research.

[20]  A. Doucette,et al.  The benefits (and misfortunes) of SDS in top-down proteomics. , 2017, Journal of proteomics.

[21]  Albert J R Heck,et al.  Robust, Sensitive, and Automated Phosphopeptide Enrichment Optimized for Low Sample Amounts Applied to Primary Hippocampal Neurons. , 2017, Journal of proteome research.

[22]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  Mass-spectrometric exploration of proteome structure and function , 2016, Nature.

[23]  A. Heck,et al.  Six alternative proteases for mass spectrometry–based proteomics beyond trypsin , 2016, Nature Protocols.

[24]  Shivakumar Keerthikumar,et al.  ExoCarta: A Web-Based Compendium of Exosomal Cargo. , 2016, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  M. Dhaenens,et al.  Minimizing technical variation during sample preparation prior to label-free quantitative mass spectrometry. , 2015, Analytical biochemistry.

[26]  A. Zougman,et al.  C-STrap Sample Preparation Method—In-Situ Cysteinyl Peptide Capture for Bottom-Up Proteomics Analysis in the STrap Format , 2015, PloS one.

[27]  A. Hummon,et al.  Proteomic Challenges: Sample Preparation Techniques for Microgram-Quantity Protein Analysis from Biological Samples , 2015, International journal of molecular sciences.

[28]  Alexandre Zougman,et al.  Suspension trapping (STrap) sample preparation method for bottom‐up proteomics analysis , 2014, Proteomics.

[29]  Joseph A. Loo,et al.  Enhanced FASP (eFASP) to Increase Proteome Coverage and Sample Recovery for Quantitative Proteomic Experiments , 2014, Journal of proteome research.

[30]  A. Heck,et al.  Next-generation proteomics: towards an integrative view of proteome dynamics , 2012, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[31]  John Chilton,et al.  Using iRT, a normalized retention time for more targeted measurement of peptides , 2012, Proteomics.

[32]  A. Doucette,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up proteomics of SDS-containing solutions following mass-based separation. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[33]  M. Mann,et al.  Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis , 2009, Nature Methods.

[34]  M. Mann,et al.  MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[35]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  Mechanisms of specificity in protein phosphorylation , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[36]  M. Larsen,et al.  Highly selective enrichment of phosphorylated peptides using titanium dioxide , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[37]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Mass spectrometry-based proteomics , 2003, Nature.

[38]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Mechanism of signal suppression by anionic surfactants in capillary electrophoresis-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. , 1996, Analytical chemistry.

[39]  Brad T. Sherman,et al.  Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources , 2008, Nature Protocols.