How reliable is the Alvarado score in acute appendicitis?

BACKGROUND We aimed to investigate the reliability of the Alvarado score (AS) in determining acute appendicitis and the different parameters that affect the AS. METHODS Three hundred and thirteen patients suspected of acute appendicitis (AA) aged 18-70 years were included in this study. Patient data including AS calculated from emergency services and at discharge, follow-up, and operations were recorded. Patients were divided into three groups according to the AS, as AS <4, AS 5-7 and AS 8-10. AA and appendicitis perforation rates were compared according to the different parameters. RESULTS The mean age of patients (55% females, 45% males) was 30.8±10.8 years. The AA (appendix perforation) rates of 211 patients who underwent operation were found as: AS ≤4: 56.5% (7.7%), AS 5-7: 75.9% (10%), and AS 8-10: 89% (27.8%). The percentage of negative appendectomy was 19.4%. The scoring was more reliable in males with AS 5-7, and the reliability weakened as body mass index (BMI) increased in all groups. CONCLUSION Patients with AS ≤4 must be followed up and should be informed at the time of their discharge about the slight possibility of appendicitis. The effect of AS in determining the diagnosis of appendicitis is not influenced by age or symptom duration.

[1]  M. Eryılmaz,et al.  The value of serum fibrinogen level in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. , 2012, Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES.

[2]  Tom Fahey,et al.  The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis: a systematic review , 2011, BMC medicine.

[3]  E. Hocaoğlu,et al.  Efficiency of unenhanced MRI in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: comparison with Alvarado scoring system and histopathological results. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[4]  A. Tin,et al.  Comparison of RIPASA and Alvarado scores for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. , 2011, Singapore medical journal.

[5]  A. Singer,et al.  The accuracy of emergency medicine and surgical residents in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. , 2010, American Journal of Emergency Medicine.

[6]  J. Arnaud,et al.  The use of the Alvarado score in the management of right lower quadrant abdominal pain in the adult. , 2010, Journal of visceral surgery.

[7]  J. Hamming,et al.  Improving diagnosis of acute appendicitis: results of a diagnostic pathway with standard use of ultrasonography followed by selective use of CT. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[8]  M. Eskelinen,et al.  Appendicitis score for children with suspected appendicitis. A randomized clinical trial , 2009, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.

[9]  A. Nazir,et al.  Role of total leukocyte count in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. , 2008, Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad : JAMC.

[10]  Shyam K. Gupta,et al.  Application of Alvarado Scoring System in Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis , 2008 .

[11]  E. Yıldırım,et al.  Alvarado scores and pain onset in relation to multislice CT findings in acute appendicitis. , 2008, Diagnostic and interventional radiology.

[12]  A. Kayhan,et al.  The comparison of plain film and ultrasound findings of appendicitis in children , 2008 .

[13]  E. Pesonen,et al.  A diagnostic score for children with suspected appendicitis , 2005, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.

[14]  D. Chung,et al.  Imaging of acute appendicitis: US as the primary imaging modality , 2005, Pediatric Radiology.

[15]  J. Gani,et al.  Protocol‐based approach to suspected appendicitis, incorporating the Alvarado score and outpatient antibiotics , 2004, ANZ journal of surgery.

[16]  A. Denizbasi,et al.  The role of the emergency medicine resident using the Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with the general surgery resident , 2003, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[17]  P. Davidson,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of ultrasonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis, incorporating the Alvarado score , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.