Preplanning for aimed movements: Disruption from a preliminary task.

[1]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  REACTION TIME ANALYSIS Of PROGRAMMED CONTROL , 1977, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[2]  S T Klapp,et al.  Programmed control of aimed movements revisited the role of target visibility and symmetry. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  K. M. Newell,et al.  Relative contribution of movement time, amplitude, and velocity to response initiation. , 1980 .

[4]  P. McLeod.  A Dual Task Response Modality Effect: Support for Multiprocessor Models of Attention , 1977 .

[5]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  The Latency and Duration of Rapid Movement Sequences: Comparisons of Speech and Typewriting , 1978 .

[6]  F. M. Henry,et al.  Increased Response Latency for Complicated Movements and A “Memory Drum” Theory of Neuromotor Reaction , 1960 .

[7]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  Relation between programming time and duration of the response being programmed. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  P. Fitts,et al.  INFORMATION CAPACITY OF DISCRETE MOTOR RESPONSES. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  Christina Rw,et al.  Hand position as a variable determining the accuracy of aiming movements. , 1982 .

[10]  B. Kerr,et al.  Task Factors That Influence Selection and Preparation for Voluntary Movements , 1978 .

[11]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  Feedback versus motor programming in the control of aimed movements. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.