The probative value of simultaneous contradictory belief: Reply to Gigerenzer and Regier (1996).
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. Sloman. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .
[2] Gerd Gigerenzer,et al. How do we tell an association from a rule , 1996 .
[3] B. Foss. New Horizons in Psychology 1 , 1966 .
[4] S. Sloman,et al. Is Deontic Reasoning Special ? , 1996 .
[5] G. Gigerenzer,et al. Cognition as Intuitive Statistics , 1987 .
[6] Robert L. Goldstone. The role of similarity in categorization: providing a groundwork , 1994, Cognition.
[7] L. Shastri,et al. From simple associations to systematic reasoning: A connectionist representation of rules, variables and dynamic bindings using temporal synchrony , 1993, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[8] J. Townsend. Serial vs. Parallel Processing: Sometimes They Look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and Should) be Distinguished , 1990 .
[9] A. Ortony,et al. Similarity and Analogical Reasoning , 1991 .
[10] D. O. Hebb,et al. The organization of behavior , 1988 .
[11] R. Falk. A closer look at the probabilities of the notorious three prisoners , 1992, Cognition.
[12] S. Sloman. Do simple associations lead to systematic reasoning? , 1993, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[13] A. Tversky,et al. Causal Schemata in Judgments under Uncertainty , 1982 .
[14] M. Fishbein. Progress in social psychology , 1980 .
[15] M. Birnbaum. Base Rates in Bayesian Inference: Signal Detection Analysis of the Cab Problem , 1983 .
[16] Judea Pearl,et al. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.
[17] Nick Chater,et al. A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. , 1994 .
[18] W. James,et al. The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .
[19] Patrizia Tabossi,et al. Processing Ambiguous Words in Context , 1993 .
[20] A. Tversky. Features of Similarity , 1977 .
[21] A. Garnham,et al. Thinking and Reasoning , 1994 .
[22] S. Sloman. Feature-Based Induction , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.
[23] R. Shillcock,et al. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 1995 .
[24] Edward E. Smith,et al. The Case for Rules in Reasoning , 1992, Cogn. Sci..