Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine-structure distortion on the fluctuating-masker benefit for speech at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] H. Levitt. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] P F Seitz,et al. The recognition of isolated words and words in sentences: individual variability in the use of sentence context. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] S. Bacon,et al. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[4] R. Plomp,et al. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. II. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] Emily Buss,et al. Masking release for words in amplitude-modulated noise as a function of modulation rate and task. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] Peggy B Nelson,et al. Speech perception in gated noise: the effects of temporal resolution. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] K. S. Rhebergen,et al. Extended speech intelligibility index for the prediction of the speech reception threshold in fluctuating noise. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] B C Moore,et al. Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in the presence of interfering speech. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] G. A. Miller,et al. The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.
[11] Nandini Iyer,et al. Effects of target-masker contextual similarity on the multimasker penalty in a three-talker diotic listening task. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] T Houtgast,et al. A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] Louis D Braida,et al. Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] K. D. Kryter,et al. ARTICULATION-TESTING METHODS: CONSONANTAL DIFFERENTIATION WITH A CLOSED-RESPONSE SET. , 1965, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] Michael K. Qin,et al. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] Laurent Demany,et al. Consequences of cochlear damage for the detection of interaural phase differences. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] T W Tillman,et al. Interaction of competing speech signals with hearing losses. , 1970, Archives of otolaryngology.
[18] S P Bacon,et al. Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[19] Thomas Baer,et al. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing‐impaired and normally hearing people , 1997 .
[20] Brian C J Moore,et al. The importance of temporal fine structure information in speech at different spectral regions for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] Emily Buss,et al. Temporal Fine-Structure Cues to Speech and Pure Tone Modulation in Observers with Sensorineural Hearing Loss , 2004, Ear and hearing.
[22] Dan Gnansia,et al. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release , 2008, Hearing Research.
[23] Brian R Glasberg,et al. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.
[24] R Plomp,et al. Effect of multiple speechlike maskers on binaural speech recognition in normal and impaired hearing. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] Michelle R. Molis,et al. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[26] Brian C J Moore,et al. The contribution of temporal fine structure to the intelligibility of speech in steady and modulated noise. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[27] Richard L Freyman,et al. Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[28] A. Boothroyd,et al. Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[29] Brian C J Moore,et al. Moderate cochlear hearing loss leads to a reduced ability to use temporal fine structure information. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] D D Dirks,et al. Speech recognition in amplitude-modulated noise of listeners with normal and listeners with impaired hearing. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[31] B C Moore,et al. Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] Joshua G. W. Bernstein,et al. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[33] Fan-Gang Zeng,et al. Effects of cochlear implant processing and fundamental frequency on the intelligibility of competing sentences. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[34] Graham Naylor,et al. Long-term signal-to-noise ratio at the input and output of amplitude-compression systems. , 2009, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[35] T W Tillman,et al. Perceptual masking in multiple sound backgrounds. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[36] D A Nelson,et al. A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[37] G. Kidd,et al. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[38] Richard L Freyman,et al. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[39] Richard L Freyman,et al. Spatial release from masking with noise-vocoded speech. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[40] Brian C. J. Moore,et al. Frequency discrimination of complex tones by hearing-impaired subjects: Evidence for loss of ability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Hearing Research.
[41] Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[42] B. Moore,et al. Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in noise , 1993 .
[43] D S Brungart,et al. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[44] Brian C J Moore,et al. Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[45] Christian Lorenzi,et al. Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine structure degradation on speech masking release. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[46] S. Soli,et al. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[47] John H Grose,et al. Age Effects in Temporal Envelope Processing: Speech Unmasking and Auditory Steady State Responses , 2009, Ear and hearing.
[48] Andrew J Oxenham,et al. Masking release for low- and high-pass-filtered speech in the presence of noise and single-talker interference. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[49] K. S. Rhebergen,et al. A Speech Intelligibility Index-based approach to predict the speech reception threshold for sentences in fluctuating noise for normal-hearing listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[50] Brian C J Moore,et al. Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[51] T. Houtgast,et al. Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.