Nature of DNA sequences at the attachment regions of genes to the nuclear matrix

Matrix‐attached regions (MARs) have been demonstrated to nest origins of replication and transcriptional enhancers. A set of 13 rules is proposed aimed at facilitating the classification of a DNA sequence as a matrix attachment region. These rules, which were deduced from a study of known MARs from other genes and some others identified in our laboratory, are (1) potential origin of replication are MARs; (2) the major class of MARs seclude clusters of AT‐rich motifs and may harbor topoisomerase II binding and cleavage sites; (3) the AT‐rich class of MARs may comprise the DNA sequence motifs ATTA and ATTTA representing core binding sites of homeotic proteins, implying that MARs may participate in the differential activation of origins of replication and in gene switch during development; (4) the habitat of MARs may include mass binding sites for protein transcription factors; even weak factor binding sites may lead to the formation of tight protein‐DNA supramolecular structures; (5) MARs may contain intrinsically curved DNA; one type is oligo(dA) stretches of 3 to 7 nucleotides spaced every 10.5 nucleotides; (6) a class of MARs may contain kinked DNA, formed by CA, TG, and TA dinucleotides at distances of 5 or 10.5 nucleotides from their centers; the same dinucleotides, known to be abundant in protein recognition sites, may be overrepresented in a special class of MARs; (7) the AT‐rich core of MARs may be flanked, at one or both sides, by sequences that can adopt the left‐handed or triple‐helical DNA structure; these include TG, TA, GC repeats and polypurine or polypyrimidine stretches; (8) palindromic (dyad symmetry) sequences, able to form cruciform structures when the DNA is under torsional strain may be found within MARs, and more so when the MAR is also an origin of replication; (9) transcriptional enhancers may be MARs; (10) a class of MARs may be composed of stretches of GA‐rich DNA alternating with CT‐rich stretches, 5–50 nucleotides long; (11) a class of MARs may be enriched in TG boxes, usually 6–12 nucleotides long, such as TGTTTTGGGG; this type of MAR occurs in the 3′‐untranslated region of several genes, builds up the chromosome telomeres, and is highly recombinogenic; (12) a small fraction of Alu sequences might have MAR activity. This might depend on the number and distance from one another of DNA sequence motifs representing protein binding sites; and (13) MARs may coincide with the DNAse I hypersensitive sites of chromatin.

[1]  R E Harrington,et al.  Sequence-dependent kinks induced in curved DNA. , 1990, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[2]  I. Brukner,et al.  Curved DNA without AA/TT dinucleotide step , 1991, Nucleic Acids Res..

[3]  W. Ostertag,et al.  The chicken lysozyme 5' matrix attachment region increases transcription from a heterologous promoter in heterologous cells and dampens position effects on the expression of transfected genes. , 1990, Molecular and cellular biology.

[4]  Hen-Ming Wu,et al.  The locus of sequence-directed and protein-induced DNA bending , 1984, Nature.

[5]  F. Blattner,et al.  Direct evidence for DNA bending at the lambda replication origin. , 1987, Science.

[6]  E. Trifonov.  DNA in profile. , 1991, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[7]  P. Cockerill,et al.  The enhancer of the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus is flanked by presumptive chromosomal loop anchorage elements. , 1987, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[8]  F. Blattner,et al.  Sequence-induced DNA curvature at the bacteriophage λ origin of replication , 1985, Nature.

[9]  W F Thompson,et al.  Nuclear scaffolds and scaffold-attachment regions in higher plants. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  Genes and loops in 320,000 base-pairs of the Drosophila melanogaster chromosome. , 1986, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  M. Buongiorno-Nardelli,et al.  The relationship between chromosomal origins of replication and the nuclear matrix during the cell cycle. , 1986, Experimental cell research.

[12]  T. Boulikas.  Relation between carcinogenesis, chromatin structure and poly(ADP-ribosylation) (review). , 1991, Anticancer research.

[13]  T. Boulikas.  Protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions in calf thymus nuclear matrix using cross-linking by ultraviolet irradiation. , 1986, Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire.

[14]  J. Weber,et al.  Abundant class of human DNA polymorphisms which can be typed using the polymerase chain reaction. , 1989, American journal of human genetics.

[15]  S. Gasser,et al.  Chromosomal ARS and CEN elements bind specifically to the yeast nuclear scaffold , 1988, Cell.

[16]  J. Bode,et al.  Scaffold-attached regions from the human interferon beta domain can be used to enhance the stable expression of genes under the control of various promoters. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[17]  B. Vogelstein,et al.  The ovalbumin gene is associated with the nuclear matrix of chicken oviduct cells , 1982, Cell.

[18]  R. Berezney,et al.  Nuclear protein matrix: association with newly synthesized DNA. , 1975, Science.

[19]  J. Guénet,et al.  A new strategy useful for rapid identification of microsatellites from DNA libraries with large size inserts. , 1992, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  T. Boulikas.  Homeotic protein binding sites, origins of replication, and nuclear matrix anchorage sites share the ATTA and ATTTA motifs , 1992, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[21]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  The organisation of chromatin loops: characterization of a scaffold attachment site , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[22]  S. Gasser,et al.  Drosophila scaffold-attached regions bind nuclear scaffolds and can function as ARS elements in both budding and fission yeasts , 1990, Molecular and cellular biology.

[23]  W. Ross,et al.  Biochemical analysis of att-defective mutants of the phage lambda site-specific recombination system. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  J. Bode,et al.  Hierarchical binding of DNA fragments derived from scaffold-attached regions: correlation of properties in vitro and function in vivo. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[25]  R. Berezney,et al.  Molecular cloning of matrin 3. A 125-kilodalton protein of the nuclear matrix contains an extensive acidic domain. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[26]  L. Bossi,et al.  Conformational change in the DNA associated with an unusual promoter mutation in a tRNA operon of Salmonella , 1984, Cell.

[27]  T. Orr-Weaver,et al.  Regulation of DNA replication during Drosophila development. , 1987, Annual review of genetics.

[28]  J. W. Bodnar,et al.  A domain model for eukaryotic DNA organization: a molecular basis for cell differentiation and chromosome evolution. , 1988, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  T. Boulikas,et al.  Functional organization in the nucleus. , 1982, International review of cytology.

[30]  Ellen Fanning,et al.  An altered DNA conformation in origin region I is a determinant for the binding of SV40 large T antigen , 1986, Cell.

[31]  E S Lander,et al.  A genetic map of the mouse suitable for typing intraspecific crosses. , 1992, Genetics.

[32]  J. R. Paulson,et al.  The structure of histone-depleted metaphase chromosomes , 1977, Cell.

[33]  G. Stein,et al.  Progressive changes in the protein composition of the nuclear matrix during rat osteoblast differentiation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  J. Bode,et al.  Chromatin domain surrounding the human interferon-beta gene as defined by scaffold-attached regions. , 1988, Biochemistry.

[35]  E. Trifonov,et al.  The pitch of chromatin DNA is reflected in its nucleotide sequence. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  B. Vogelstein,et al.  A fixed site of DNA replication in eucaryotic cells , 1980, Cell.

[37]  B. Vogelstein,et al.  Nonrandom distribution of repeated DNA sequences with respect to supercoiled loops and the nuclear matrix. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  V. P. Chuprina,et al.  New insights into the structure of An tracts and B'-B' bends in DNA. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[39]  L. Mullenders,et al.  Nuclear matrix associated DNA is preferentially repaired in normal human fibroblasts, exposed to a low dose of ultraviolet light but not in Cockayne's syndrome fibroblasts. , 1988, Nucleic acids research.

[40]  T. Cech,et al.  Cloning and expression of genes for the Oxytricha telomere-binding protein: Specific subunit interactions in the telomeric complex , 1991, Cell.

[41]  M. Leibovitch,et al.  A destabilized DNA conformation associated with tightly bound nuclear proteins in active genes of rat myoblast. , 1983, Nucleic Acids Research.

[42]  Structural basis of stable bending in DNA containing An tracts. Different types of bending. , 1988, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[43]  D. Lamarre,et al.  Immunoelectron microscopical distribution of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase in the mammalian cell nucleus. , 1988, Experimental cell research.

[44]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  Scaffold attachment of DNA loops in metaphase chromosomes. , 1988, Journal of molecular biology.

[45]  S. Gasser,et al.  Identification and purification of a protein that binds the yeast ARS consensus sequence , 1991, Cell.

[46]  W. H. Stratling,et al.  The matrix attachment regions of the chicken lysozyme gene co‐map with the boundaries of the chromatin domain. , 1988, The EMBO journal.

[47]  M. DePamphilis,et al.  Initiation of SV40 DNA replication in vivo: Location and structure of 5′ ends of DNA synthesized in the ori region , 1982, Cell.

[48]  A. E. Sippel,et al.  A nuclear DNA attachment element mediates elevated and position-independent gene activity , 1989, Nature.

[49]  D M Crothers,et al.  Intrinsically bent DNA. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[50]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Bent DNA at a yeast autonomously replicating sequence , 1986, Nature.

[51]  P. Cockerill,et al.  Protein:DNA interactions at chromosomal loop attachment sites. , 1989, Genome.

[52]  P. Goodfellow,et al.  Rapid cloning and characterization of new chromosome 10 DNA markers by Alu element-mediated PCR. , 1990, Genomics.

[53]  R E Harrington,et al.  Curved DNA without A-A: experimental estimation of all 16 DNA wedge angles. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  P. Cockerill,et al.  Chromosomal loop anchorage of the kappa immunoglobulin gene occurs next to the enhancer in a region containing topoisomerase II sites , 1986, Cell.

[55]  Hen-Ming Wu,et al.  DNA bending at adenine · thymine tracts , 1986, Nature.

[56]  B. O’Malley,et al.  Actively transcribed genes are associated with the nuclear matrix , 1983, Nature.

[57]  C. Fortier,et al.  The limits of the DNase I-sensitive domain of the human apolipoprotein B gene coincide with the locations of chromosomal anchorage loops and define the 5' and 3' boundaries of the gene. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[58]  W. Garrard,et al.  Immunoglobulin kappa gene expression after stable integration. I. Role of the intronic MAR and enhancer in plasmacytoma cells. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[59]  M. DePamphilis,et al.  The origin of bidirectional DNA replication in polyoma virus. , 1987, The EMBO journal.

[60]  P. Cook,et al.  Lesions induced in DNA by ultraviolet light are repaired at the nuclear cage. , 1984, Journal of cell science.

[61]  H. Ariga,et al.  An initiation site of DNA replication with transcriptional enhancer activity present upstream of the c‐myc gene. , 1988, The EMBO journal.

[62]  E. Zuckerkandl,et al.  Generation of high specificity of effect through low‐specificity binding of proteins to DNA , 1988, FEBS letters.

[63]  H. G. Callan.  DNA replication in the chromosomes of eukaryotes. , 1974, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[64]  M. Buongiorno-Nardelli,et al.  A relationship between replicon size and supercoiled loop domains in the eukaryotic genome , 1982, Nature.

[65]  N. Osheroff,et al.  In situ localization of DNA topoisomerase II, a major polypeptide component of the Drosophila nuclear matrix fraction. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[66]  John N. Anderson,et al.  Detection, sequence patterns and function of unusual DNA structures. , 1986, Nucleic acids research.

[67]  L. Frappier,et al.  Autonomous replication of plasmids bearing monkey DNA origin-enriched sequences. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[68]  F. Grosveld,et al.  The 5′HS2 of the globin locus control region enhances transcription through the interaction of a multimeric complex binding at two functionally distinct NF‐E2 binding sites. , 1991, The EMBO journal.

[69]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  Organization of the higher-order chromatin loop: specific DNA attachment sites on nuclear scaffold , 1984, Cell.

[70]  T. Boulikas,et al.  Multitude of inverted repeats characterizes a class of anchorage sites of chromatin loops to the nuclear matrix , 1993, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[71]  L. Villarreal.  Relationship of eukaryotic DNA replication to committed gene expression: general theory for gene control. , 1991, Microbiological reviews.

[72]  B. S. Rao,et al.  Sequence similarities among monkey ori-enriched (ors) fragments. , 1990, Gene.

[73]  E. Käs,et al.  Anchorage of the Chinese hamster dihydrofolate reductase gene to the nuclear scaffold occurs in an intragenic region. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[74]  R. Opstelten,et al.  Organization of DNA replication in Physarum polycephalum. Attachment of origins of replicons and replication forks to the nuclear matrix. , 1983, Nucleic acids research.

[75]  T. Boulikas.  Chromatin and nuclear matrix in development and in carcinogenesis - a theory. , 1992, International journal of oncology.

[76]  W. Jelinek,et al.  Replication of a plasmid bearing a human Alu-family repeat in monkey COS-7 cells. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[77]  B. Johnston,et al.  The S1-sensitive form of d(C-T)n.d(A-G)n: chemical evidence for a three-stranded structure in plasmids. , 1988, Science.

[78]  D. Botstein,et al.  Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. , 1980, American journal of human genetics.

[79]  R. Hammer,et al.  Immunoglobulin kappa gene expression after stable integration. II. Role of the intronic MAR and enhancer in transgenic mice. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[80]  S V Razin,et al.  Organization of the 3'-boundary of the chicken alpha globin gene domain and characterization of a CR 1-specific protein binding site. , 1990, Nucleic acids research.

[81]  N. Grindley,et al.  The γδ resolvase induces an unusual DNA structure at the recombinational crossover point , 1987, Cell.

[82]  R Berezney,et al.  The nuclear matrix: A heuristic model for investigating genomic organization and function in the cell nucleus , 1991, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[83]  G. Georgiev,et al.  Replication origins are attached to the nuclear skeleton. , 1986, Nucleic acids research.

[84]  Andrew Travers,et al.  DNA bending and nucleosome positioning , 1987 .

[85]  W. Earnshaw,et al.  Topoisomerase II is a structural component of mitotic chromosome scaffolds , 1985, The Journal of cell biology.

[86]  S. Fakan,et al.  Localisation of rapidly and slowly labelled nuclear RNA as visualized by high resolution autoradiography. , 1971, Experimental cell research.

[87]  D. Higgs,et al.  Nuclear scaffold attachment sites in the human globin gene complexes. , 1988, The EMBO journal.

[88]  Nikos Panayotatos,et al.  Cruciform structures in supercoiled DNA , 1981, Nature.

[89]  J. V. Kries,et al.  A matrix/scaffold attachment region binding protein: Identification, purification, and mode of binding , 1991, Cell.

[90]  P. Dijkwel,et al.  Matrix attachment regions are positioned near replication initiation sites, genes, and an interamplicon junction in the amplified dihydrofolate reductase domain of Chinese hamster ovary cells , 1988, Molecular and cellular biology.

[91]  L. Mullenders,et al.  Replication forks are associated with the nuclear matrix. , 1990, Nucleic acids research.

[92]  A. Rich,et al.  Chemical probes of DNA conformation: detection of Z-DNA at nucleotide resolution , 1985, Cell.

[93]  E. Trifonov,et al.  Sequence-dependent deformational anisotropy of chromatin DNA. , 1980, Nucleic acids research.

[94]  S. Kaufmann,et al.  Characterization of the major polypeptides of the rat liver nuclear envelope. , 1983, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[95]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  In vivo topoisomerase II cleavage of the Drosophila histone and satellite III repeats: DNA sequence and structural characteristics. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[96]  R. Greenstein.  Constitutive Attachment of Murine Erythroleukemia Cell Histone-Depleted DNA Loops to Nuclear Scaffolding Is Found in the β-Major but Not the α1-Globin Gene , 1988 .

[97]  M. Lieber,et al.  V(D)J recombination: a functional definition of the joining signals. , 1989, Genes & development.

[98]  M. Marilley,et al.  Supercoiled loop organization of genomic DNA: a close relationship between loop domains, expression units, and replicon organization in rDNA from Xenopus laevis. , 1989, Experimental cell research.

[99]  Ueli Schibler,et al.  The interplay of DNA-binding proteins on the promoter of the mouse albumin gene , 1987, Cell.

[100]  J. Nickerson,et al.  Core filaments of the nuclear matrix , 1990, The Journal of cell biology.

[101]  P. Cockerill,et al.  Chromosomal loop anchorage sites appear to be evolutionarily conserved , 1986, FEBS letters.

[102]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  Cohabitation of scaffold binding regions with upstream/enhancer elements of three developmentally regulated genes of D. melanogaster , 1986, Cell.