An Annotation Process for Data Visualization Techniques

As the area of information visualization grows, a massive amount of visualization techniques has been developed. Consequently, the choice of an appropriate visualization has become more complex, usually resulting in unsatisfactory data analysis. Although there exist models and classifications that could guide the choice of a visualization technique, they are mostly generalist and do not present a clear methodology for evaluation and evolution. In contrast, we propose an annotation process for data visualization techniques based on an initial capability-driven collection of terms and concepts that encompasses visual components of both well established as well as modern visualization techniques. To demonstrate the initial collections expressiveness, we present a qualitative analysis of an experiment with specialist users at annotating visualization techniques from the D (Data-Driven Documents) library. Furthermore, to show the completeness of the collection, we automatically assess its coverage of all published papers from six major international information visualization conferences since 1995. Our results attest the expressiveness of the initial collection and its coverage of over 99% of the analysed literature. Finally, we discuss the limitations and alternatives for semi-automatically evolving the annotation process as new visualization techniques are developed and how the spread of this type of methodology could benefit the information visualization community. Keywords–Annotation Process; Data Visualization; Ontologies; Taxonomies.

[1]  Min Chen,et al.  From Web Data to Visualization via Ontology Mapping , 2008, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[2]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  A taxonomy of visualization techniques using the data state reference model , 2000, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2000. INFOVIS 2000. Proceedings.

[3]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  SpanningAspectRatioBank Easing FunctionS ArrayIn ColorIn Date Interpolator MatrixInterpola NumObjecPointI Rectang ISchedu Parallel Pause Scheduler Sequen Transition Transitioner Transiti Tween Co DelimGraphMLCon IData JSONCon DataField DataSc Dat DataSource Data DataUtil DirtySprite LineS RectSprite , 2011 .

[4]  Ken Brodlie,et al.  Building an Ontology of Visualization , 2004, IEEE Visualization 2004.

[5]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations , 1996, Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.

[6]  Peter Triantafillou,et al.  Crowdsourcing Taxonomies , 2012, ESWC.

[7]  Dona M. Wong The Wall Street Journal Guide to Information Graphics: The Dos and Don'ts of Presenting Data, Facts, and Figures , 2010 .

[8]  David M. W. Powers,et al.  A Unified Taxonomic Framework for Information Visualization , 2003, InVis.au.

[9]  Michael Lewis,et al.  Evaluating visualizations: using a taxonomic guide , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  Colin Ware,et al.  Visual Thinking for Design , 2008 .

[11]  Clayton Lewis,et al.  A problem-oriented classification of visualization techniques , 1990, Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Visualization: Visualization `90.

[12]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[13]  Wagner Meira,et al.  FPCluster: An Efficient Out-of-core Clustering Strategy without a Similarity Metric , 2012, J. Inf. Data Manag..

[14]  E. Tufte Beautiful Evidence , 2006 .

[15]  Alan J. Dix,et al.  A Taxonomy of Clutter Reduction for Information Visualisation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[16]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  Envisioning Information , 1990 .

[17]  Omer F. Rana,et al.  Bringing semantics to visualization services , 2008, Advances in Engineering Software.

[18]  Alan Gilchrist,et al.  Thesauri, taxonomies and ontologies - an etymological note , 2003, J. Documentation.

[19]  HeerJeffrey,et al.  D3 Data-Driven Documents , 2011 .

[20]  Julie Steele,et al.  Beautiful Visualization - Looking at Data Through the Eyes of Experts , 2010, Beautiful Visualization.

[21]  Julia Kastner,et al.  Show Me The Numbers Designing Tables And Graphs To Enlighten , 2016 .

[22]  Jian Pei,et al.  Mining Frequent Patterns without Candidate Generation: A Frequent-Pattern Tree Approach , 2006, Sixth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining - Workshops (ICDMW'06).

[23]  Yuriko Takeshima,et al.  GADGET/IV: a taxonomic approach to semi-automatic design of information visualization applications using modular visualization environment , 2000, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2000. INFOVIS 2000. Proceedings.

[24]  Jian Pei,et al.  Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation , 2000, SIGMOD '00.

[25]  Melanie Tory,et al.  Rethinking Visualization: A High-Level Taxonomy , 2004, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization.

[26]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Visual task characterization for automated visual discourse synthesis , 1998, CHI.

[27]  Robert Spence,et al.  Information Visualization: Design for Interaction (2nd Edition) , 2007 .

[28]  Issei Fujishiro,et al.  The elements of graphing data , 2005, The Visual Computer.

[29]  Peter L. Brooks,et al.  Visualizing data , 1997 .

[30]  James R. Eagan,et al.  Low-level components of analytic activity in information visualization , 2005, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2005. INFOVIS 2005..

[31]  Yuriko Takeshima,et al.  GADGET: goal-oriented application design guidance for modular visualization environments , 1997, Proceedings. Visualization '97 (Cat. No. 97CB36155).

[32]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  Crowdsourcing Ontology Verification , 2013, ICBO.

[33]  Myke Gluck,et al.  Visual Explanations: Images and Quantities, Evidence and Narrative , 1997, Inf. Process. Manag..

[34]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[35]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Interactive Dynamics for Visual Analysis , 2012 .