Quantitative Analysis of (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Identifies Novel Prognostic Imaging Biomarkers in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE To identify prognostic biomarkers in pancreatic cancer using high-throughput quantitative image analysis. METHODS AND MATERIALS In this institutional review board-approved study, we retrospectively analyzed images and outcomes for 139 locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The overall population was split into a training cohort (n=90) and a validation cohort (n=49) according to the time of treatment. We extracted quantitative imaging characteristics from pre-SBRT (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, including statistical, morphologic, and texture features. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was built to predict overall survival (OS) in the training cohort using 162 robust image features. To avoid over-fitting, we applied the elastic net to obtain a sparse set of image features, whose linear combination constitutes a prognostic imaging signature. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the association with OS, and concordance index (CI) was used to evaluate the survival prediction accuracy. RESULTS The prognostic imaging signature included 7 features characterizing different tumor phenotypes, including shape, intensity, and texture. On the validation cohort, univariate analysis showed that this prognostic signature was significantly associated with OS (P=.002, hazard ratio 2.74), which improved upon conventional imaging predictors including tumor volume, maximum standardized uptake value, and total legion glycolysis (P=.018-.028, hazard ratio 1.51-1.57). On multivariate analysis, the proposed signature was the only significant prognostic index (P=.037, hazard ratio 3.72) when adjusted for conventional imaging and clinical factors (P=.123-.870, hazard ratio 0.53-1.30). In terms of CI, the proposed signature scored 0.66 and was significantly better than competing prognostic indices (CI 0.48-0.64, Wilcoxon rank sum test P<1e-6). CONCLUSION Quantitative analysis identified novel (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography image features that showed improved prognostic value over conventional imaging metrics. If validated in large, prospective cohorts, the new prognostic signature might be used to identify patients for individualized risk-adaptive therapy.

[1]  Lei Xing,et al.  Prognostic Imaging Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: Development and Independent Validation on the Basis of Multiregion and Quantitative Analysis of MR Images. , 2016, Radiology.

[2]  P. Lambin,et al.  Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach , 2014, Nature Communications.

[3]  E. Saad,et al.  Pretreatment CA 19-9 level as a prognostic factor in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine , 2002, International journal of gastrointestinal cancer.

[4]  Sunil J Rao,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2003 .

[5]  Florent Tixier,et al.  Visual Versus Quantitative Assessment of Intratumor 18F-FDG PET Uptake Heterogeneity: Prognostic Value in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  E Yorke,et al.  Four-dimensional (4D) PET/CT imaging of the thorax. , 2004, Medical physics.

[7]  Tai-Hsien Ou Yang,et al.  Development of a Prognostic Model for Breast Cancer Survival in an Open Challenge Environment , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[8]  W. Lu,et al.  Computerized PET/CT image analysis in the evaluation of tumour response to therapy. , 2015, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  D. Rubin,et al.  Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Quantitative Imaging Characteristics of (18)F Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT Allow Prediction of Distant Metastasis. , 2016, Radiology.

[10]  S. Goodman,et al.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Cancer of the Head of the Pancreas 201 Patients , 1995, Annals of surgery.

[11]  Byung Il Kim,et al.  Prognostic value of SUVmax measured by Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography with Computed Tomography in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer , 2012, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[12]  F. Brooks,et al.  The Effect of Small Tumor Volumes on Studies of Intratumoral Heterogeneity of Tracer Uptake , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  M. Endo,et al.  Preoperative FDG-PET Predicts Early Recurrence and a Poor Prognosis After Resection of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma , 2015, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[14]  M. Hatt,et al.  Intratumor Heterogeneity Characterized by Textural Features on Baseline 18F-FDG PET Images Predicts Response to Concomitant Radiochemotherapy in Esophageal Cancer , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  Issam El-Naqa,et al.  Exploring feature-based approaches in PET images for predicting cancer treatment outcomes , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[16]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2014 , 2014, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[17]  Vicky Goh,et al.  Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Erlotinib: Heterogeneity of (18)F-FDG Uptake at PET-Association with Treatment Response and Prognosis. , 2015, Radiology.

[18]  Andre Dekker,et al.  Radiomics: the process and the challenges. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[19]  P. Lambin,et al.  Stability of FDG-PET Radiomics features: An integrated analysis of test-retest and inter-observer variability , 2013, Acta oncologica.

[20]  C. Kang,et al.  Prognostic Value of Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis on Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  M. Hatt,et al.  18F-FDG PET Uptake Characterization Through Texture Analysis: Investigating the Complementary Nature of Heterogeneity and Functional Tumor Volume in a Multi–Cancer Site Patient Cohort , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  Vicky Goh,et al.  Are Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET Tumor Textural Features in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Associated with Response and Survival After Chemoradiotherapy? , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  elastix: A Toolbox for Intensity-Based Medical Image Registration , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  T. Pawlik,et al.  Baseline metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis are associated with survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  A. Windhorst,et al.  Feasibility and repeatability of PET with the hypoxia tracer [(18)F]HX4 in oesophageal and pancreatic cancer. , 2015, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[26]  Shan Tan,et al.  Modeling pathologic response of esophageal cancer to chemoradiation therapy using spatial-temporal 18F-FDG PET features, clinical parameters, and demographics. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  R. Tibshirani The lasso method for variable selection in the Cox model. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[28]  Patrick Granton,et al.  Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[29]  Olivier Gevaert,et al.  Prognostic PET 18F-FDG uptake imaging features are associated with major oncogenomic alterations in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer. , 2012, Cancer research.

[30]  A. Koong,et al.  18Fluorodeoxyglucose PET is prognostic of progression-free and overall survival in locally advanced pancreas cancer treated with stereotactic radiotherapy. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  H. Matsuda,et al.  Preoperative 18[F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography predicts early recurrence after pancreatic cancer resection , 2011, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  Richard M. Simon,et al.  Using cross-validation to evaluate predictive accuracy of survival risk classifiers based on high-dimensional data , 2011, Briefings Bioinform..

[33]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Regularization Paths for Cox's Proportional Hazards Model via Coordinate Descent. , 2011, Journal of statistical software.

[34]  D. Sahani,et al.  State-of-the-art PET/CT of the pancreas: current role and emerging indications. , 2012, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[35]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  Shao Hui Huang,et al.  External validation of a prognostic CT-based radiomic signature in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma , 2015, Acta oncologica.

[37]  D. Winchester,et al.  Pancreatic cancer: a report of treatment and survival trends for 100,313 patients diagnosed from 1985-1995, using the National Cancer Database. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[38]  I. El Naqa,et al.  A radiomics model from joint FDG-PET and MRI texture features for the prediction of lung metastases in soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.