Nonlinear Hydrodynamic Force Relevance forHeaving Point Absorbers and Oscillating SurgeConverters

Two of the most common modes of oscillation of single degree of freedom wave energy converters are heave and surge, which are respectively exploited by heaving point absorbers (HPAs) and oscillating surge converters (OSCs). Notwithstanding essential hydrodynamic differences, both devices are very often described by the same linear model structure. However, if the linearising assumption of small amplitudes of motion is challenged, especially under controlled conditions, different (and significant) nonlinearities are excited in the devices. This paper studies the differences between the hydrodynamic forces in HPAs and OSCs under controlled conditions, considering a nonlinear representation of Froude-Krylov forces and viscous drag effects. Results show that HPAs are predominantly affected by nonlinear Froude-Krylov forces, while the most important hydrodynamic forces in OSCs are due to diffraction and radiation effects. In addition, viscous drag appears to have little relevance in HPAs but a significant influence in OSCs.

[1]  堀川 清司,et al.  Nonlinear water waves : IUTAM Symposium, Tokyo/Japan, August 25-28, 1987 , 1988 .

[2]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Hybrid frequency-time domain models for dynamic response analysis of marine structures , 2008 .

[3]  John Ringwood,et al.  Nonlinear Froude-Krylov force modelling for two heaving wave energy point absorbers , 2015 .

[4]  J. R. Morison,et al.  The Force Exerted by Surface Waves on Piles , 1950 .

[5]  Nicholas Jenkins,et al.  Optimisation of a clutch-rectified power take off system for a heaving wave energy device in irregular waves with experimental comparison , 2014 .

[6]  Aurélien Babarit,et al.  Numerical benchmarking study of a selection of wave energy converters , 2012 .

[7]  Aurélien Babarit,et al.  On the numerical modelling of the non-linear behaviour of a wave energy converter , 2009 .

[8]  Matthew Folley,et al.  Contrasting the hydrodynamics of heaving and surging wave energy converters , 2015 .

[9]  Aurélien Babarit,et al.  Potential Time Domain Model with Viscous Correction and CFD Analysis of a Generic Surging Floating Wave Energy Converter , 2015 .

[10]  Peter W. Bearman,et al.  Forces on cylinders in viscous oscillatory flow at low Keulegan-Carpenter numbers , 1985, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  A. Babarit,et al.  Effect of Viscous Forces on the Performance of a Surging Wave Energy Converter , 2012 .

[12]  J. Gilloteaux,et al.  Mouvements de grande amplitude d'un corps flottant en fluide parfait. Application à la récupération de l'énergie des vagues. , 2007 .

[13]  John Ringwood,et al.  Computationally efficient nonlinear Froude–Krylov force calculations for heaving axisymmetric wave energy point absorbers , 2017 .

[14]  Aurélien Babarit,et al.  Assessment of Viscous Damping via 3D-CFD Modelling of a Floating Wave Energy Device , 2015 .

[15]  G. H. Keulegan,et al.  Forces on cylinders and plates in an oscillating fluid , 1958 .

[16]  W. Cummins THE IMPULSE RESPONSE FUNCTION AND SHIP MOTIONS , 2010 .