Anthropogenic and biogenic CO2 fluxes in the Boston urban region

Significance Cities are taking a leading role in US efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and require traceable methods to assess the efficacy of their efforts. In this study, we developed an inverse model framework that quantified emissions in the Boston urban region over 16 months and is capable of detecting changes in emissions of greater than 18%. We show that a detailed representation of urban biological fluxes and knowledge of the spatial and temporal distribution of emissions are essential for accurate modeling of annual CO2 emissions. Across the globe, it is possible to quantifiably assess the efficacy of mitigation efforts by developing frameworks similar to the one we present here for Boston. With the pending withdrawal of the United States from the Paris Climate Accord, cities are now leading US actions toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Implementing effective mitigation strategies requires the ability to measure and track emissions over time and at various scales. We report CO2 emissions in the Boston, MA, urban region from September 2013 to December 2014 based on atmospheric observations in an inverse model framework. Continuous atmospheric measurements of CO2 from five sites in and around Boston were combined with a high-resolution bottom-up CO2 emission inventory and a Lagrangian particle dispersion model to determine regional emissions. Our model−measurement framework incorporates emissions estimates from submodels for both anthropogenic and biological CO2 fluxes, and development of a CO2 concentration curtain at the boundary of the study region based on a combination of tower measurements and modeled vertical concentration gradients. We demonstrate that an emission inventory with high spatial and temporal resolution and the inclusion of urban biological fluxes are both essential to accurately modeling annual CO2 fluxes using surface measurement networks. We calculated annual average emissions in the Boston region of 0.92 kg C·m−2·y−1 (95% confidence interval: 0.79 to 1.06), which is 14% higher than the Anthropogenic Carbon Emissions System inventory. Based on the capability of the model−measurement approach demonstrated here, our framework should be able to detect changes in CO2 emissions of greater than 18%, providing stakeholders with critical information to assess mitigation efforts in Boston and surrounding areas.

[1]  P. Ciais,et al.  An attempt at estimating Paris area CO 2 emissions from atmospheric concentration measurements , 2014 .

[2]  M. Friedl,et al.  Accounting for urban biogenic fluxes in regional carbon budgets. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  K. Davis,et al.  High‐resolution atmospheric inversion of urban CO2 emissions during the dormant season of the Indianapolis Flux Experiment (INFLUX) , 2016, Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR.

[4]  John C. Lin,et al.  Coupled weather research and forecasting–stochastic time-inverted lagrangian transport (WRF–STILT) model , 2010 .

[5]  M. Ha-Duong,et al.  Climate change 2014 - Mitigation of climate change , 2015 .

[6]  T. Lauvaux,et al.  Los Angeles megacity: A high-resolution land-atmosphere modelling system for urban CO2 emissions , 2016 .

[7]  Lin Wu,et al.  The first 1-year-long estimate of the Paris region fossil fuel CO 2 emissions based on atmospheric inversion , 2016 .

[8]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Assessment of ground-based atmospheric observations for verification of greenhouse gas emissions from an urban region , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  J. Randerson,et al.  An atmospheric perspective on North American carbon dioxide exchange: CarbonTracker , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  T. Lauvaux,et al.  Reconciling the differences between a bottom-up and inverse-estimated FFCO 2 emissions estimate in a large US urban area , 2017 .

[11]  Kevin R. Gurney,et al.  A multiyear, global gridded fossil fuel CO2 emission data product: Evaluation and analysis of results , 2014 .

[12]  Conor K. Gately,et al.  Cities, traffic, and CO2: A multidecadal assessment of trends, drivers, and scaling relationships , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  S. Schneider,et al.  Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report: A contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2001 .

[14]  R. Draxler,et al.  NOAA’s HYSPLIT Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling System , 2015 .

[15]  Bedrich Benes,et al.  Quantification of fossil fuel CO2 emissions on the building/street scale for a large U.S. city. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Influence of biotic exchange and combustion sources on atmospheric CO2 concentrations in New England from observations at a forest flux tower , 1999 .

[17]  Conor K. Gately,et al.  Large Uncertainties in Urban‐Scale Carbon Emissions , 2017 .

[18]  A. Karion,et al.  Siting Background Towers to Characterize Incoming Air for Urban Greenhouse Gas Estimation: A Case Study in the Washington, DC/Baltimore Area , 2017 .

[19]  R. Weiss,et al.  Carbon dioxide and methane measurements from the Los Angeles Megacity Carbon Project – Part 1: calibration, urban enhancements, and uncertainty estimates , 2016, Atmospheric chemistry and physics.

[20]  John C. Lin,et al.  A near-field tool for simulating the upstream influence of atmospheric observations: The Stochastic Time-Inverted Lagrangian Transport (STILT) model , 2003 .

[21]  Mark S. Zahniser,et al.  Methane emissions from natural gas infrastructure and use in the urban region of Boston, Massachusetts , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Yuyu Zhou,et al.  High resolution fossil fuel combustion CO2 emission fluxes for the United States. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.