Internet Abuse among Teenagers and Its Relations to Internet Usage Patterns and Demographics

Introduction Internet access and usage in the world has been proliferating year by year, with approximately 1.11 billion users in 2007, 1.67 billion in 2009, and 1.97 billion in 2010 (Miniwatts Marketing Group, 2010), indicating an upward trend in the number of digitally literate people. Such a rapid growth has been interacted with people's needs and motivation. Information, communication, and entertainment have been prominent motives behind the Internet use. The advantages of the Internet are undeniable and well-evidenced in the literature. Nevertheless, excessive or unregulated usage has been associated with a condition of Internet-related disturbances which Morahan-Martin (2008) calls "Internet abuse" referring to the "patterns of using the Internet that result in disturbances in a person's life but does not imply a specific disease process or addictive behavior" (p. 34). Some scholars or clinicians prefer to use the term "Internet addiction" to define this condition as a form of impulse control disorder (e.g., Young, 1998). Despite various approaches to the conceptualization of the condition, which is still developing and negotiated in ongoing research, studies acknowledged its existence and reported similar symptoms: school and work-related impairments, interpersonal problems, preoccupation with using the Internet, using the Internet to improve negative moods, and serious disturbances in users' social capitals (Morahan-Martin, 2008). The present study adopted the concept of Internet abuse because it examined the condition in a non-pathological population and operationalized the Internet behavior as a continuum from normal to problematic usage. Nowadays, the adoption of digital technologies is known to be higher in young adolescents than adults. For example, the highest proportion of computer and Internet usage belongs to the 16-24 year old age group in Turkey (TUIK, 2010), where Internet users aged 15 and older were reported as the most engaged users in Europe in terms of time spent and the content consumed on the Internet (comScore, 2009). Being the mainstream consumers and drivers of digital contents, youngsters are at the center of a lucrative digital marketing enterprise. New products are designed essentially for appealing to emotions, habits, and values in youth culture (Montgomery, Gottlieb-Robles & Larson, 2004). This in turn makes young people early adopters and heavy users of digital technologies. Such an involvement, coupled with the psychologically sensitive developments of adolescence period, can make teenagers more susceptible to digital disturbances such as Internet abuse (Chou, Condron & Belland, 2005; Tsai & Lin, 2003). Therefore, empirical investigations of factors in problematic Internet use among teenagers have been called for to help parents, teachers, and counselors in guiding teenagers about the conscious and beneficial effects of Internet use. This study attempted to contribute to this call by exploring possible interactions between Turkish high school students' status of Internet abuse, Internet usage patterns, and demographic characteristics. Although prior research on overall analysis of Internet abuse is prolific, the research on socio-demographic differences in this field is rather sparse or inconclusive. Gender is one of the predominantly investigated variables seen in the literature. While some studies indicated no gender differences in Internet abuse (e.g., Ferraro, Caci, D'amico & Blasi, 2007; Lee et al., 2007; Soule, Shall & Kleen, 2003), others revealed that males were more likely to become Internet abusers than females (e.g., Chou et al., 2005; Morahan-Martin & Schumacher, 2000; Yang & Tung, 2007). Although socio-economic status (SES) is an important factor especially in the developing countries, where digital divide still exists to some degree, not much attention has been devoted to this demographic variable. Only a few studies concluded that SES was not significantly associated with Internet abuse (e. …

[1]  S. Park,et al.  Prevalence of Internet addiction and correlations with family factors among South Korean adolescents. , 2008, Adolescence.

[2]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do , 2002, UBIQ.

[3]  Shu Ching Yang,et al.  Comparison of Internet addicts and non-addicts in Taiwanese high school , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  M. Koc,et al.  The Consequences of Internet Cafe use on Turkish College Students' Social Capital. , 2007 .

[5]  Fatih Bayraktar,et al.  Incidence and Correlates of Internet Usage Among Adolescents in North Cyprus , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[6]  Scotty D. Craig,et al.  AutoTutor Detects and Responds to Learners Affective and Cognitive States , 2008 .

[7]  Mary McMurran,et al.  The Psychometric Properties of the Internet Addiction Test , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[8]  E. Hardie,et al.  Excessive internet use: the role of personality, loneliness and social support networks in internet addiction , 2007 .

[9]  A. Johansson,et al.  Internet addiction: characteristics of a questionnaire and prevalence in Norwegian youth (12-18 years). , 2004, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[10]  Keith W. Beard,et al.  Internet Addiction: A Review of Current Assessment Techniques and Potential Assessment Questions , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[11]  I. Lyoo,et al.  Attention deficit hyperactivity symptoms and Internet addiction , 2004, Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[12]  James C. Lester,et al.  Animated Pedagogical Agents: Face-to-Face Interaction in Interactive Learning Environments , 2000 .

[13]  K. Young Caught in the Net: How to Recognize the Signs of Internet Addiction--and a Winning Strategy for Recovery , 1998 .

[14]  James C. Lester,et al.  The Case for Social Agency in Computer-Based Teaching: Do Students Learn More Deeply When They Interact With Animated Pedagogical Agents? , 2001 .

[15]  Betty A. Kleen,et al.  Exploring Internet Addiction: Demographic Characteristics and Stereotypes of Heavy Internet Users , 2003, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[16]  James C. Lester,et al.  Achieving Affective Impact: Visual Emotive Communication in Lifelike Pedagogical Agents , 1999 .

[17]  J. Morahan-Martin,et al.  Incidence and correlates of pathological Internet use among college students ? ? Portions of this pa , 2000 .

[18]  James C. Lester,et al.  Animated pedagogical agents and problem-solving effectiveness: a large-scale empirical evaluation , 1997 .

[19]  John F. Canny,et al.  More than face-to-face: empathy effects of video framing , 2009, CHI.

[20]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Sensation seeking and internet dependence of Taiwanese high school adolescents , 2000, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  S Tzvetanova,et al.  Affect assessment in educational system using outSite factors , 2005 .

[22]  E. Vesterinen,et al.  Affective Computing , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[23]  K. Scherer,et al.  How Seductive Details Do Their Damage : A Theory of Cognitive Interest in Science Learning , 2004 .

[24]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Computers are social actors , 1994, CHI '94.

[25]  Yanghee Kim,et al.  Pedagogical agents as learning companions: the impact of agent emotion and gender , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[26]  Antonella D'Amico,et al.  Internet Addiction Disorder: An Italian Study , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[27]  Aysegul Yolga Tahiroglu,et al.  Internet Use Among Turkish Adolescents , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[28]  James C. Lester,et al.  Modeling and evaluating empathy in embodied companion agents , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[29]  Kathryn Montgomery,et al.  Youth as e-citizens: engaging the digital generation , 1970 .

[30]  Soyoung Kim,et al.  Designing nonverbal communication for pedagogical agents: When less is more , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  Tuncay Sevindik,et al.  Profile of Internet Cafe users in Turkey , 2007, Telematics Informatics.

[32]  Chien Chou,et al.  Internet addiction, usage, gratification, and pleasure experience: the Taiwan college students' case , 2000, Comput. Educ..

[33]  J. Michael Tarn,et al.  Internet dependency: Its impact on online behavioral patterns in E-commerce , 2004 .

[34]  Sylvie Pesty,et al.  Evaluating the affective tactics of an emotional pedagogical agent , 2009, SAC '09.

[35]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Internet Addiction of Adolescents in Taiwan: An Interview Study , 2003, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[36]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  The Cognitive Structure of Emotions , 1988 .

[37]  Patricia D. Mautone,et al.  Social cues in multimedia learning: Role of speaker's voice. , 2003 .

[38]  G. Hofstede Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , 2001 .

[39]  Chien Chou,et al.  A Review of the Research on Internet Addiction , 2005 .

[40]  F. Bayraktar İnternet kullanımının ergen gelişimdeki rolü , 2001 .

[41]  P. Ekman,et al.  Facial action coding system: a technique for the measurement of facial movement , 1978 .

[42]  Azy Barak,et al.  Psychological Aspects of Cyberspace: Theory, Research, Applications , 2008 .

[43]  Ning Wang,et al.  The politeness effect: Pedagogical agents and learning outcomes , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[44]  Kimberly S. Young,et al.  Prevalence Estimates and Etiologic Models of Internet Addiction , 2012 .

[45]  Jonathan P. Rowe,et al.  Story-Based Learning: The Impact of Narrative on Learning Experiences and Outcomes , 2008, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[46]  James C. Lester,et al.  The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents , 1997, CHI.

[47]  F. Cao,et al.  Internet addiction among Chinese adolescents: prevalence and psychological features. , 2007, Child: Care, Health and Development.

[48]  Mark H. Davis Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach , 1994 .

[49]  Janet Morahan-Martin,et al.  Internet Abuse: Emerging Trends and Lingering Questions , 2008 .

[50]  K. Fragkos,et al.  Internet Addiction among Greek University Students: Demographic Associations with the Phenomenon, Using the Greek Version of Young's Internet Addiction Test , 2010 .

[51]  R. Mayer,et al.  Fostering social agency in multimedia learning: Examining the impact of an animated agent’s voice ☆ , 2005 .

[52]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  Affective pedagogical agents and user persuasion , 2001, HCI.

[53]  Moon-Soo Lee,et al.  Characteristics of Internet Use in Relation to Game Genre in Korean Adolescents , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[54]  R. Bhagat Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations , 2002 .