Natural population analysis

A method of ‘‘natural population analysis’’ has been developed to calculate atomic charges and orbital populations of molecular wave functions in general atomic orbital basis sets. The natural analysis is an alternative to conventional Mulliken population analysis, and seems to exhibit improved numerical stability and to better describe the electron distribution in compounds of high ionic character, such as those containing metal atoms. We calculated ab initio SCF‐MO wave functions for compounds of type CH3X and LiX (X=F, OH, NH2, CH3, BH2, BeH, Li, H) in a variety of basis sets to illustrate the generality of the method, and to compare the natural populations with results of Mulliken analysis, density integration, and empirical measures of ionic character. Natural populations are found to give a satisfactory description of these molecules, providing a unified treatment of covalent and extreme ionic limits at modest computational cost.

[1]  Frank Weinhold,et al.  Natural bond orbital analysis of near‐Hartree–Fock water dimer , 1983 .

[2]  Hans Peter Lüthi,et al.  How well does the Hartree–Fock model predict equilibrium geometries of transition metal complexes? Large‐scale LCAO–SCF studies on ferrocene and decamethylferrocene , 1982 .

[3]  J. Noell.  Modified electronic population analysis for transition-metal complexes , 1982 .

[4]  J. B. Collins,et al.  Integrated spatial electron populations in molecules: Application to simple molecules , 1980 .

[5]  J. B. Collins,et al.  Integrated spatial electron populations in molecules: The electron projection function. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  F. Weinhold,et al.  Quantum-mechanical studies on the origin of barriers to internal rotation about single bonds , 1979 .

[7]  J. Pople,et al.  Molecular orbital theory of the electronic structure of molecules. 34. Structures and energies of small compounds containing lithium or beryllium. Ionic, multicenter, and coordinate bonding , 1977 .

[8]  J. Stephen Binkley,et al.  Self‐consistent molecular orbital methods. XIX. Split‐valence Gaussian‐type basis sets for beryllium , 1977 .

[9]  T. H. Dunning.  Gaussian Basis Functions for Use in Molecular Calculations. III. Contraction of (10s6p) Atomic Basis Sets for the First‐Row Atoms , 1970 .

[10]  J. Pople,et al.  Self‐Consistent Molecular Orbital Methods. IV. Use of Gaussian Expansions of Slater‐Type Orbitals. Extension to Second‐Row Molecules , 1970 .

[11]  J. Pople,et al.  Self‐Consistent Molecular‐Orbital Methods. I. Use of Gaussian Expansions of Slater‐Type Atomic Orbitals , 1969 .

[12]  B. C. Carlson,et al.  Orthogonalization Procedures and the Localization of Wannier Functions , 1957 .

[13]  R. S. Mulliken.  Electronic Population Analysis on LCAO–MO Molecular Wave Functions. I , 1955 .

[14]  P. Löwdin.  Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems. I. Physical Interpretations by Means of Density Matrices, Natural Spin-Orbitals, and Convergence Problems in the Method of Configurational Interaction , 1955 .

[15]  P. Löwdin.  On the Non‐Orthogonality Problem Connected with the Use of Atomic Wave Functions in the Theory of Molecules and Crystals , 1950 .