Industrial development in thin regions: trapped in path extension?

Recent theorizing of path dependence supplements the traditional view of regional path-dependent industrial development characterized by lock-in effects with paths dealing with change, that is, path renewal and path creation. Few studies, however, examine why different types of regions experience diverse path-dependent development. This article examines why organizationally thin regions are much less likely to achieve path renewal and path creation than core regions. By use of a case study of industrial development in an organizationally thin and rather peripheral region in Norway the article contends that thin regions often need external investments to avoid being trapped in path extension.

[1]  A. Isaksen,et al.  What Is Regional in Regional Clusters? The Case of the Globally Oriented Oil and Gas Cluster in Agder, Norway , 2012 .

[2]  Erik Stam,et al.  Path Dependence Research in Regional Economic Development: Cacophony or Knowledge Accumulation? , 2013 .

[3]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  The Economic Geography of Innovation: Tacit knowledge in production systems: how important is geography? , 2007 .

[4]  Ron Martin,et al.  Rethinking Regional Path Dependence: Beyond Lock-in to Evolution , 2009 .

[5]  R. Hassink Regional resilience: a promising concept to explain differences in regional economic adaptability? , 2010 .

[6]  Ron Martin,et al.  Conceptualizing Cluster Evolution: Beyond the Life Cycle Model? , 2011 .

[7]  F. Tödtling,et al.  One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach , 2005 .

[8]  A. Malmberg,et al.  Myopia, knowledge development and cluster evolution , 2007 .

[9]  M. Bell,et al.  The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster , 2005 .

[10]  Ron Boschma,et al.  How Do Regions Diversify over Time? Industry Relatedness and the Development of New Growth Paths in Regions , 2011 .

[11]  Michaela Trippl,et al.  Transformation of regional innovation systems : from old legacies to new development paths , 2012 .

[12]  B. Lundvall,et al.  Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation , 2007 .

[13]  Bjørn Gustavsen,et al.  The Nordic Model of Work Organization , 2011 .

[14]  Ron Boschma,et al.  Towards an Evolutionary Perspective on Regional Resilience , 2015 .

[15]  Arnoud Lagendijk,et al.  Proximity, Knowledge and Innovation in Peripheral Regions. On the Intersection between Geographical and Organizational Proximity , 2007 .

[16]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Path Dependence or Path Creation? , 2010 .

[17]  Ron Boschma,et al.  Related Variety, Trade Linkages, and Regional Growth in Italy , 2009 .

[18]  R. Martin (Re)Placing Path Dependence: A Response to the Debate , 2012 .

[19]  Ron Boschma,et al.  Technological relatedness and regional branching , 2009 .

[20]  R. Martin,et al.  Path dependence and regional economic evolution , 2006 .

[21]  Svein Erik Moen,et al.  Innovation and production in the Norwegian aluminium industry , 2007 .

[22]  Olav Wicken,et al.  The Layers of National Innovation Systems: The Historical Evolution of a National Innovation System in Norway , 2007 .

[23]  K. Frenken,et al.  Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth , 2007 .

[24]  B. Asheim,et al.  Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local ‘Sticky’ and Global ‘Ubiquitous’ Knowledge , 2002 .

[25]  James Simmie,et al.  Path Dependence and New Technological Path Creation in the Danish Wind Power Industry , 2012 .

[26]  Ron Boschma,et al.  Technological Relatedness, Related Variety and Economic Geography , 2011 .

[27]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[28]  Arne Isaksen,et al.  Innovation by co-evolution in natural resource industries: The Norwegian experience , 2011 .

[29]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  Evolution in Economic Geography: Institutions, Political Economy, and Adaptation , 2009 .