The impact of component commonality on composite assembly policies

Assemble in Advance (AIA) policy reduces assembly cost due to advance planning, while Assemble to Order (ATO) policy eliminates assembly of excessive (more than demanded) units. The tradeoffs between the two policies have been studied in the past for single product environments. Moreover, it was shown that it is beneficial to employ AIA and ATO simultaneously. In this article, we study the employment of such a composite assembly policy in a multiproduct environment with component commonality. When common components are used, ATO may also enable us to benefit from the risk pooling effect. We provide important managerial insights such as: the multiperiod problem is myopic and changes in inventory levels due to the use of common components, and demonstrate the potential profit increase compared to other policies.© 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2007

[1]  Jr. Arthur F. Veinott.  The Status of Mathematical Inventory Theory , 1966 .

[2]  A. Eynan.  The impact of demands' correlation on the effectiveness of component commonality , 1996 .

[3]  K. R. Baker.  Safety stocks and component commonality , 1985 .

[4]  Yigal Gerchak,et al.  Component commonality in assemble-to-order systems: Models and properties , 1989 .

[5]  M. J. Rosenblatt,et al.  Component commonality effects on inventory costs , 1996 .

[6]  Yigal Gerchak,et al.  An inventory model with component commonality , 1986 .

[7]  Meir J. Rosenblatt,et al.  Assemble to order and assemble in advance in a single-period stochastic environment , 1995 .

[8]  Jan A. Van Mieghem.  Note - Commonality Strategies: Value Drivers and Equivalence with Flexible Capacity and Inventory Substitution , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[9]  Moncer Hariga.  A single-period, multi-echelon stochastic model under a mix of assemble to order and assemble in advance policies , 1998 .

[10]  Daniel P. Heyman,et al.  Stochastic models in operations research , 1982 .

[11]  Ilkyeong Moon,et al.  Distribution free procedures for make-to-order (MTO), make-in-advance (MIA), and composite policies , 1997 .

[12]  L. Zurich,et al.  Operations Research in Production Planning, Scheduling, and Inventory Control , 1974 .

[13]  Genaro J. Gutierrez,et al.  Effect of increasing component commonality on service level and holding cost , 1992 .

[14]  M. Magazine,et al.  Component Commonality with Service Level Requirements , 1988 .

[15]  K. R. Baker,et al.  The Effect of Commonality on Safety Stock in a Simple Inventory Model , 1986 .

[16]  A. F. Veinott.  Optimal Policy for a Multi-product, Dynamic Non-Stationary Inventory Problem , 1965 .

[17]  J. G. Bryan,et al.  A multi‐stage inventory model , 1955 .

[18]  Meir J. Rosenblatt,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF PURCHASING COSTS AS THE NUMBER OF PRODUCTS‘ COMPONENTS IS REDUCED , 2009 .