Construal Level Theory of Mobile Persuasion

This article introduces the construal level theory of mobile persuasion. Concepts associated with both construal level theory and mobile technology are articulated through a literature review and synthesized into a series of assumptions that relate specifically to persuasive communication. Eight theoretical propositions are proposed, introducing three message functions: shifting construal level orientation, bridging construal level perception of choice, and traversing psychological distance to choice. We argue that conceptual relationships between the affordances of mobile technology and construal level theory make mobile devices particularly suited to test and implement these propositions. Message success and message resistance are discussed through this framework. We specify the potential to use construal level theory in effective mobile health interventions and propose a research agenda to further apply construal level theory to the process of communication.

[1]  Jens Förster,et al.  How Global Versus Local Perception Fits Regulatory Focus , 2005, Psychological science.

[2]  E. A. Locke,et al.  New Directions in Goal-Setting Theory , 2006 .

[3]  Rosemary Thackeray,et al.  Empowering Youth: Use of Technology in Advocacy to Affect Social Change , 2010, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[4]  Shen Li,et al.  Designing for context-aware health self-monitoring, feedback, and engagement , 2011, CSCW.

[5]  G. Miller,et al.  Science Perspectives on Psychological the Smartphone Psychology Manifesto on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science the Smartphone Psychology Manifesto Previous Research Using Mobile Electronic Devices What Smartphones Can Do Now and Will Be Able to Do in the near Future , 2022 .

[6]  Daniel M. Bartels,et al.  Representation Across Time: Generalizing Temporal Effects on Perceived Similarity , 2006 .

[7]  Y. Trope,et al.  Construal-level theory of psychological distance. , 2010, Psychological review.

[8]  Geri Gay.  Context-Aware Mobile Computing: Affordances of Space, Social Awareness, and Social Influence , 2009, Context-Aware Mobile Computing.

[9]  Kentaro Fujita,et al.  thE EffEcts of constrUal lEvEls on asymmEtric tEmPtation-goal cognitivE associations , 2011 .

[10]  Richard Ling.  New Tech, New Ties: How Mobile Communication Is Reshaping Social Cohesion , 2008 .

[11]  Gary L. Kreps,et al.  New directions in eHealth communication: opportunities and challenges. , 2010, Patient education and counseling.

[12]  Y. Trope,et al.  The Psychology of Transcending the Here and Now , 2008, Science.

[13]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit , 1997 .

[14]  Sahara Byrne,et al.  The Boomerang Effect A Synthesis of Findings and a Preliminary Theoretical Framework , 2009 .

[15]  Rich Ling,et al.  FEATURETaken for granted: the infusion of the mobile phone in society , 2008, INTR.

[16]  P. Gollwitzer.  Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. , 1999 .

[17]  Wanda Pratt,et al.  How to evaluate technologies for health behavior change in HCI research , 2011, CHI.

[18]  B. Wellman.  The Reconstruction of Space and Time: Mobile Communication Practices , 2010 .

[19]  G. Menon,et al.  When a day means more than a year: Effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk , 2004 .

[20]  Lee Humphreys,et al.  Evolving Mobile Media: Uses and Conceptualizations of the Mobile Internet , 2013, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[21]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Construal Level and Procrastination , 2008, Psychological science.

[23]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Mining behavioral economics to design persuasive technology for healthy choices , 2011, CHI.

[24]  J Kinloch,et al.  Automatic processing. , 1969, Radiography.

[25]  Lee Humphreys,et al.  Mobile Social Networks and Social Practice: A Case Study of Dodgeball , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[26]  G. Semin,et al.  Receivers' Expectations for Abstract Versus Concrete Construal , 2008 .

[27]  Alexander K. Koch,et al.  Self-Regulation Through Goal Setting , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[28]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  It's Time to Vote: The Effect of Matching Message Orientation and Temporal Frame on Political Persuasion , 2009 .

[29]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. , 1989 .

[30]  Marco Yzer,et al.  Construal Level Theory and Theory of Planned Behavior: Time Frame Effects on Salient Belief Generation , 2011, Journal of health communication.

[31]  Nira Liberman,et al.  Distancing from experienced self: how global-versus-local perception affects estimation of psychological distance. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  The Effect of Construal Level on Subjective Probability Estimates , 2009, Psychological science.

[33]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Construal levels and self-control. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Kentaro Fujita,et al.  Moving Beyond Deliberative Control of Impulses , 2009, Psychological science.

[35]  D. Boninger,et al.  The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. , 1994 .

[36]  J. Brehm.  A theory of psychological reactance. , 1981 .

[37]  B. Dellaert,et al.  Consumers’ evaluation of allocation policies for scarce health care services: Vested interest activation trumps spatial and temporal distance , 2011 .

[38]  K. Fujita,et al.  Influencing Attitudes Toward Near and Distant Objects. , 2008, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[39]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Politeness and psychological distance: a construal level perspective. , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  Xiaoli Nan,et al.  Social Distance, Framing, and Judgment: A Construal Level Perspective , 2007 .

[41]  K. Fujita,et al.  Transcending Temptation Through Abstraction , 2012 .

[42]  Y. Trope,et al.  The association between psychological distance and construal level: evidence from an implicit association test. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[43]  Alf Børre Kanten.  The effect of construal level on predictions of task duration , 2011 .

[44]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Automatic processing of psychological distance: evidence from a Stroop task. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[45]  A. Tenbrunsel,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2013 .

[46]  R. Whittaker,et al.  A Theory-Based Video Messaging Mobile Phone Intervention for Smoking Cessation: Randomized Controlled Trial , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[47]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  The Experience Sampling Method , 2014 .

[48]  Dean Eckles,et al.  Mobile Persuasion: 20 Perspectives on the Future of Behavior Change , 2007 .

[49]  Melissa J. Ferguson,et al.  The goal construct in social psychology. , 2007 .

[50]  John P. Pollak,et al.  PAM: a photographic affect meter for frequent, in situ measurement of affect , 2011, CHI.

[51]  Y. Trope,et al.  The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others' self-regulatory efforts ☆ , 2004 .

[52]  Klaus Fiedler,et al.  Construal Level Theory as an Integrative Framework for Behavioral Decision-Making Research and Consumer Psychology , 2007 .

[53]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  Consumer response to brand extensions: Construal level as a moderator of the importance of perceived fit , 2008 .

[54]  Gabriele Oettingen,et al.  Implementation Intentions , 2019, Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine.

[55]  K. White,et al.  It's the Mind-Set that Matters: The Role of Construal Level and Message Framing in Influencing Consumer Efficacy and Conservation Behaviors , 2011 .

[56]  Lee Humphreys,et al.  Cellphones in public: social interactions in a wireless era , 2005, New Media Soc..

[57]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Ecological momentary assessment. , 2008, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[58]  Brian Sternthal,et al.  Value from Regulatory Construal Fit: The Persuasive Impact of Fit between Consumer Goals and Message Concreteness , 2010 .

[59]  J. Katz,et al.  Perpetual Contact , 2002 .