Image classifiers for the cell transformation assay: a progress report

The Cell Transformation Assay (CTA) is one of the promising in vitro methods used to predict human carcinogenicity. The neoplastic phenotype is monitored in suitable cells by the formation of foci and observed by light microscopy after staining. Foci exhibit three types of morphological alterations: Type I, characterized by partially transformed cells, and Types II and III considered to have undergone neoplastic transformation. Foci recognition and scoring have always been carried visually by a trained human expert. In order to automatically classify foci images one needs to implement some image understanding algorithm. Herewith, two such algorithms are described and compared by performance. The supervised classifier (as described in previous articles) relies on principal components analysis embedded in a training feedback loop to process the morphological descriptors extracted by "spectrum enhancement" (SE). The unsupervised classifier architecture is based on the "partitioning around medoids" and is applied to image descriptors taken from histogram moments (HM). Preliminary results suggest the inadequacy of the HMs as image descriptors as compared to those from SE. A justification derived from elementary arguments of real analysis is provided in the Appendix.

[1]  Giovanni Franco Crosta,et al.  The spectrum enhancement algorithm for feature extraction and pattern recognition , 2005, SPIE Optics East.

[2]  C Urani,et al.  Image analysis and automatic classification of transformed foci , 2009, Journal of microscopy.

[3]  M Costa,et al.  Cell Transformation Assays , 2001, Current protocols in toxicology.

[4]  Chiara Urani,et al.  A two-stage morphological classifier of foci occurring in cell transformation assays , 2009, BiOS.

[5]  C. Heidelberger,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative studies of chemical transformation of cloned C3H mouse embryo cells sensitive to postconfluence inhibition of cell division. , 1973, Cancer research.

[6]  Wei Qu,et al.  Cadmium‐induced malignant transformation in rat liver cells: Role of aberrant oncogene expression and minimal role of oxidative stress , 2005, International journal of cancer.

[7]  E Sabbioni,et al.  Cell Transformation Assays as Predictors of Human Carcinogenicity , 1999, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[8]  A. Knight,et al.  Animal carcinogenicity studies: implications for the REACH system. , 2006, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[9]  Chiara Urani,et al.  Classifying structural alterations of the cytoskeleton by spectrum enhancement and descriptor fusion. , 2006, Journal of biomedical optics.

[10]  J. Landolph,et al.  Chemical transformation in C3H 10T1/2 Cl 8 mouse embryo fibroblasts: historical background, assessment of the transformation assay, and evolution and optimization of the transformation assay protocol. , 1985, IARC scientific publications.

[11]  Ali S. Hadi,et al.  Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Chster Analysis , 1991 .

[12]  G Crosta Morphological characterization of two-dimensional random media and patterns by fractional differentiation , 2008 .

[13]  E. Stein,et al.  Introduction to Fourier Analysis on Euclidean Spaces. , 1971 .