Alternative splicing and genetic diversity: silencers are more frequently modified by SNVs associated with alternative exon/intron borders

With the availability of a large amount of genomic data it is expected that the influence of single nucleotide variations (SNVs) in many biological phenomena will be elucidated. Here, we approached the problem of how SNVs affect alternative splicing. First, we observed that SNVs and exonic splicing regulators (ESRs) independently show a biased distribution in alternative exons. More importantly, SNVs map more frequently in ESRs located in alternative exons than in ESRs located in constitutive exons. By looking at SNVs associated with alternative exon/intron borders (by their common presence in the same cDNA molecule), we observed that a specific type of ESR, the exonic splicing silencers (ESSs), are more frequently modified by SNVs. Our results establish a clear association between genetic diversity and alternative splicing involving ESSs.

[1]  N. Sakabe,et al.  transcriptome Detection and evaluation of intron retention events in the human , 2004 .

[2]  Francisco E. Baralle,et al.  Genomic variants in exons and introns: identifying the splicing spoilers , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[3]  Mathieu Blanchette,et al.  Global patterns of cis variation in human cells revealed by high-density allelic expression analysis , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[4]  Yang Liu,et al.  Divergence of exonic splicing elements after gene duplication and the impact on gene structures , 2009, Genome Biology.

[5]  A. Camargo,et al.  Sense-antisense pairs in mammals: functional and evolutionary considerations , 2007, Genome Biology.

[6]  R. Strausberg,et al.  ORESTES are enriched in rare exon usage variants affecting the encoded proteins. , 2003, Comptes rendus biologies.

[7]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  Distribution of SR protein exonic splicing enhancer motifs in human protein-coding genes , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  C. Burge,et al.  Splicing regulation: from a parts list of regulatory elements to an integrated splicing code. , 2008, RNA.

[9]  A. Uitterlinden,et al.  Tissue Effect on Genetic Control of Transcript Isoform Variation , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[10]  Noboru Jo Sakabe,et al.  Detection and evaluation of intron retention events in the human transcriptome. , 2004, RNA.

[11]  Yi Xing,et al.  Evidence for a subpopulation of conserved alternative splicing events under selection pressure for protein reading frame preservation. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[12]  Jacek Majewski,et al.  Fine-Scale Variation and Genetic Determinants of Alternative Splicing across Individuals , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[13]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  An increased specificity score matrix for the prediction of SF2/ASF-specific exonic splicing enhancers. , 2006, Human molecular genetics.

[14]  L. Chasin,et al.  Splicing of designer exons reveals unexpected complexity in pre-mRNA splicing. , 2009, RNA.

[15]  J. Mullikin,et al.  Genomic features defining exonic variants that modulate splicing , 2010, Genome Biology.

[16]  S. Brenner,et al.  Evidence for the widespread coupling of alternative splicing and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in humans , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Dirk Holste,et al.  Single Nucleotide Polymorphism–Based Validation of Exonic Splicing Enhancers , 2004, PLoS biology.

[18]  M. Gelfand,et al.  Computational analysis of splicing errors and mutations in human transcripts , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[19]  Christopher J. Lee,et al.  Genome-wide detection of tissue-specific alternative splicing in the human transcriptome. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  L. Chasin,et al.  Computational definition of sequence motifs governing constitutive exon splicing. , 2004, Genes & development.

[21]  Gene W. Yeo,et al.  Systematic Identification and Analysis of Exonic Splicing Silencers , 2004, Cell.

[22]  B. Blencowe,et al.  An RNA map predicting Nova-dependent splicing regulation , 2006, Nature.

[23]  A. Krainer,et al.  Identification of Functional Exonic Splicing Enhancer Motifs Recognized by Individual Sr Proteins Using an in Vitro Randomization and Functional Selection Procedure, We Have Identified Three Novel Classes of Exonic Splicing Enhancers (eses) Recognized by Human Sf2/asf, Srp40, and Srp55, Respectively , 2022 .

[24]  Christopher J. Lee,et al.  Alternative splicing in the human, mouse and rat genomes is associated with an increased frequency of exon creation and/or loss , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[25]  R. Amann,et al.  Predictive Identification of Exonic Splicing Enhancers in Human Genes , 2022 .

[26]  A. Camargo,et al.  Identification of human exons overexpressed in tumors through the use of genome and expressed sequence data. , 2005, Physiological genomics.

[27]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  Exonic Splicing Enhancer Motif Recognized by Human SC35 under Splicing Conditions , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[28]  M. Gelfand,et al.  Frequent alternative splicing of human genes. , 1999, Genome research.

[29]  Eric T. Wang,et al.  Alternative Isoform Regulation in Human Tissue Transcriptomes , 2008, Nature.