Radiation dose vs. image quality for low-dose CT protocols of the head for maxillofacial surgery and oral implant planning.

The goal of this study was to determine the acquisition parameters for a low-dose multi-slice CT protocol and to compare the effective dose and the image quality of this low-dose protocol with the image quality of a clinical multi-slice CT protocol, routinely used for visualisation of the head. The low-dose protocol was derived from a clinical multi-slice CT protocol by lowering mA s and kV and increasing the pitch. The low-dose protocol yielded a dose reduction from 1.5 to 0.18 mSv for a multi-slice CT scan of the whole head, whereas noise in the low-dose CT images was increased. For bone segmentation, noise could be reduced by use of a non-linear edge preserving smoothing filter. Tests on ESP and skull phantom indicated that the accuracy of the measurements on low-dose CT is acceptable for image-based planning of maxillofacial and oral implant surgery, reducing the dose by a factor of 8.

[1]  H Imhof,et al.  Spiral CT and radiation dose. , 2003, European journal of radiology.

[2]  W. Kalender,et al.  The European Spine Phantom--a tool for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by DXA and QCT. , 1995, European journal of radiology.

[3]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Image-Based 3D Planning of Maxillofacial Distraction Procedures Including Soft Tissue Implications , 2000, MICCAI.

[4]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[5]  Patrik Rogalla,et al.  Low-dose CT of the paranasal sinuses with eye lens protection: effect on image quality and radiation dose , 2002, European Radiology.

[6]  T. Aaløkken,et al.  A new low-dose CT examination compared with standard-dose CT in the diagnosis of acute sinusitis , 2003, European Radiology.

[7]  W. Huda,et al.  Estimation of mean organ doses in diagnostic radiology from Rando phantom measurements. , 1984, Health physics.

[8]  R. Jacobs,et al.  Radiation doses of collimated vs non-collimated cephalometric exposures. , 2003, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[9]  Patrick Bouthemy,et al.  Robust Adaptive Segmentation of 3D Medical Images with Level Sets , 1999 .

[10]  Golikov Vy,et al.  Estimation of the mean organ doses and the effective dose equivalent from Rando phantom measurements. , 1989 .

[11]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Registration of 3D Photographs with Spiral CT Images for Soft Tissue Simulation in Maxillofacial Surgery , 2001, MICCAI.

[12]  Christian Barillot,et al.  Robust 3D Segmentation of Anatomical Structures with Level Sets , 2000, MICCAI.

[13]  Paul Suetens,et al.  A custom template and definitive prosthesis allowing immediate implant loading in the maxilla: a clinical report. , 2002, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[14]  H. Imhof,et al.  Head and neck imaging with MDCT. , 2003, European journal of radiology.

[15]  W. Kalender,et al.  Accuracy limits for the determination of cortical width and density: the influence of object size and CT imaging parameters. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[17]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.