New Technologies, New Literacies: Focus Discipline Research and ESL Learning Communities

This paper describes a classroom study of a content-based instructional model that engages high intermediate ESL students in sustained content study within collaborative learning communities and uses information technology resources to hone linguistic, academic, socioaffective, and metacognitive skills through an activity called focus discipline research (Kasper, 1998a). The paper describes how focus discipline research derives from the principles of cognitive learning theory and second language acquisition research and how it incorporates the four critical elements of a pedagogy of multiliteracies as outlined by The New London Group (1996). The paper goes on to detail the study, illustrating how pedagogical activities engaged students in situated practice, overt instruction, critical framing, and transformed practice, and it concludes by offering both quantitative and qualitative support for the efficacy of focus discipline research in promoting "multiliteracies." DEFINING AND ACQUIRING LITERACY IN THE AGE OF INFORMATION Moll defined literacy as "a particular way of using language for a variety of purposes, as a sociocultural practice with intellectual significance" (1994, p. 201). While traditional definitions of literacy have focused on reading and writing, the definition of literacy today is more complex. The process of becoming literate today involves more than learning how to use language effectively; rather, the process amplifies and changes both the cognitive and the linguistic functioning of the individual in society. One who is literate knows how to gather, analyze, and use information resources to solve problems and make decisions, as well as how to learn both independently and cooperatively. Ultimately literate individuals possess a range of skills that enable them to participate fully in all aspects of modern society, from the workforce to the family to the academic community. Indeed, the development of literacy is "a dynamic and ongoing process of perpetual transformation" (Neilsen, 1989, p. 5), whose evolution is influenced by a person's interests, cultures, and experiences. Researchers have viewed literacy as a multifaceted concept for a number of years (Johns, 1997). However, succeeding in a digital, information-oriented society demands multiliteracies, that is, competence in an even more diverse set of functional, academic, critical, and electronic skills. To be considered multiliterate, students today must acquire a battery of skills that will enable them to take advantage of the diverse modes of communication made possible by new technologies and to participate in global learning communities. Although becoming multiliterate is not an easy task for any student, it is especially difficult for ESL students operating in a second language. In their attempts to become multiliterate, ESL students must acquire linguistic competence in a new language and at the same time develop the cognitive and sociocultural skills necessary to gain access into the social, academic, and workforce environments of the 21st century. They must become functionally literate, able to speak, understand, read, and write English, as well as use English to acquire, articulate and expand their knowledge. They must also become academically literate, able to read and understand interdisciplinary texts, analyze and respond to those texts through various modes of written and oral discourse, and expand their knowledge through sustained and focused research. Further, they must become critically literate, defined here as the ability to evaluate the validity and reliability of informational sources so that they may Loretta F. Kasper New Technologies, New Literacies: Focus Discipline Research... Language Learning & Technology 97 draw appropriate conclusions from their research efforts. Finally, in our digital age of information, students must become electronically literate, able "to select and use electronic tools for communication, construction, research, and autonomous learning" (Shetzer, 1998). Helping students develop the range of literacies they need to enter and succeed at various levels of the academic hierarchy and subsequently in the workforce requires a pedagogy that facilitates and hastens linguistic proficiency development, familiarizes students with the requirements and conventions of academic discourse, and supports the use of critical thinking and higher order cognitive processes. A large body of research conducted over the past decade (see, e.g., Benesch, 1988; Brinton, Snow, & Wesche, 1989; Crandall, 1993; Kasper, 1997a, 2000a; Pally, 2000; Snow & Brinton, 1997) has shown that contentbased instruction (CBI) is highly effective in helping ESL students develop the literacies they need to be successful in academic and workforce environments. CONTENT-BASED INSTRUCTION AND LITERACY DEVELOPMENT CBI develops linguistic competence and functional literacy by exposing ESL learners to interdisciplinary input that consists of both "everyday" communicative and academic language (Cummins, 1981; Mohan, 1990; Spanos, 1989) and that contains a wide range of vocabulary, forms, registers, and pragmatic functions (Snow, Met, & Genesee, 1989; Zuengler & Brinton, 1997). Because content-based pedagogy encourages students to use English to gather, synthesize, evaluate, and articulate interdisciplinary information and knowledge (Pally, 1997), it also allows them to hone academic and critical literacy skills as they practice appropriate patterns of academic discourse (Kasper, 2000b) and become familiar with sociolinguistic conventions relating to audience and purpose (Soter, 1990). The theoretical foundations supporting a content-based model of ESL instruction derive from cognitive learning theory and second language acquisition (SLA) research. Cognitive learning theory posits that in the process of acquiring literacy skills, students progress through a series of three stages, the cognitive, the associative, and the autonomous (Anderson, 1983a). Progression through these stages is facilitated by scaffolding, which involves providing extensive instructional support during the initial stages of learning and gradually removing this support as students become more proficient at the task (Chamot & O'Malley, 1994). Second language acquisition (SLA) research emphasizes that literacy development can be facilitated by providing multiple opportunities for learners to interact in communicative contexts with authentic, linguistically challenging materials that are relevant to their personal and educational goals (see, e.g., Brinton, et al., 1989; Kasper, 2000a; Krashen, 1982; Snow & Brinton, 1997; Snow, et al., 1989). In a 1996 paper published in The Harvard Educational Review, The New London Group (NLG) advocated developing multiliteracies through a pedagogy that involves a complex interaction of four factors which they called Situated Practice, Overt Instruction, Critical Framing, and Transformed Practice. According to the NLG, becoming multiliterate requires critical engagement in relevant tasks, interaction with diverse forms of communication made possible by electronic technologies, and participation in collaborative learning contexts. Warschauer (1999) concurred and stated that a pedagogy of critical inquiry and problem solving that provides the context for "authentic and collaborative projects and analyses" (p. 16) that support and are supported by the use of electronic technologies is necessary for ESL students to acquire the linguistic, social, and technological competencies key to literacy in a digital world. According to a 1995 report published by the United States Department of Education, "technology is an important enabler for classes organized around complex, authentic tasks" and when "used in support of challenging projects, [technology] can contribute to students' sense ... that they are using real tools for real purposes." Technology use increases students' motivation as it promotes their active engagement with language and content through authentic, challenging tasks that are interdisciplinary in nature (McGrath, Loretta F. Kasper New Technologies, New Literacies: Focus Discipline Research... Language Learning & Technology 98 1998). Technology use also encourages students to spend more time on task. As they search for information in a hyperlinked environment, ESL students benefit from increased opportunities to process linguistic and content information. Used as a tool for learning, technology supports a level of task authenticity and complexity that fits well with the interdisciplinary work inherent in content-based instruction and that promotes the acquisition of multiliteracies. THEORY INTO PRACTICE These research findings suggest that in our efforts to prepare ESL students for the challenges of the academic and workforce environments of the 21st century, we should adopt a pedagogical model that incorporates information technology as an integral component and that specifically targets the development of the range of literacies deemed necessary for success in a digital, information-oriented society. This paper describes a content-based pedagogy, which I call focus discipline research (Kasper, 1998a), and presents the results of a classroom study conducted to measure the effects of focus discipline research on the development of ESL students' literacy skills. As described here, focus discipline research puts theory into practice as it incorporates the principles of cognitive learning theory, SLA research, and the four components of the NLG's (1996) pedagogy of multiliteracies. Through pedagogical activities that provide the context for situated practice, overt instruction, critical framing, and transformed practice, focus discipline research promotes ESL students' choice of and responsibility for course content, engages them in extended practice with linguistic structures and interdisciplinary material, and encourages them to become "c

[1]  D. Horowitz What Professors Actually Require: Academic Tasks for the ESL Classroom , 1986 .

[2]  Deborah J. Short,et al.  Assessing Integrated Language and Content Instruction , 1993 .

[3]  F. Genesee,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for the Integration of Language and Content in Second/Foreign Language Instruction , 1989 .

[4]  S. Michaels,et al.  A pedagogy of Multiliteracies Designing Social Futures , 1996 .

[5]  Jane Ledwell-Brown LITERACY AND LIVING: THE LITERATE LIVES OF THREE ADULTS (Author: Lorri Neilsen) , 1990 .

[6]  Char Ullman Social Identity and the Adult ESL Classroom. ERIC Digest. , 1997 .

[7]  Stephen Krashen,et al.  Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition , 1982 .

[8]  Gayle Nelson,et al.  ESL Reading: Schema Theory and Standardized Tests , 1989 .

[9]  Sarah Benesch,et al.  Ending Remediation: Linking ESL and Content in Higher Education. , 1988 .

[10]  John R. Anderson A Spreading Activation Theory of Memory , 1988 .

[11]  J. Elkins,et al.  Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy , 2001 .

[12]  K. Bruffee Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge , 1995 .

[13]  Robert J. Tierney,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Hypertext on Learners' Architecture of Literacy Learning Spaces in Different Disciplines: Follow-Up Studies. , 1997 .

[14]  Marguerite Ann Snow,et al.  Content-based second language instruction , 1989 .

[15]  Susan Imel,et al.  Teaching Critical Reflection , 1998 .

[16]  Patricia Cranton,et al.  Professional Development as Transformative Learning. New Perspectives for Teachers of Adults. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1996 .

[17]  Joanne Devine,et al.  The implications of cognitive models in L1 and L2 writing , 1993 .

[18]  Bertram C. Bruce Computers and the collaborative experience of learning , 1995 .

[19]  G. Spanos,et al.  On the Integration of Language and Content Instruction , 1989, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[20]  R. T. Kellogg The Psychology of Writing , 1994 .

[21]  J. Carson,et al.  Students' Perceptions of EAP Writing Instruction and Writing Needs Across the Disciplines , 1994 .

[22]  Dorothy M. Chun,et al.  RESEARCH ON TEXT COMPREHENSION IN MULTIMEDIA ENVIRONMENTS , 1997 .

[23]  Marcia Pally,et al.  Critical thinking in ESL: An argument for sustained content , 1997 .

[24]  J. Michael O'Malley,et al.  The Calla Handbook: Implementing the Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach , 1994 .

[25]  Bernard Mohan,et al.  LEP Students and the Integration of Language and Content: Knowledge Structures and Tasks. , 1990 .

[26]  Beth McGrath,et al.  Partners in Learning: Twelve Ways Technology Changes the Teacher-Student Relationship , 1998 .

[27]  Loretta F. Kasper,et al.  The impact of content-based instructional programs on the academic progress of ESL students , 1997 .

[28]  Loretta F. Kasper Assessing the Metacognitive Growth of ESL Student Writers. , 1997 .

[29]  J. Cummins,et al.  Brave New Schools: Challenging Cultural Illiteracy Through Global Learning Networks , 1995 .

[30]  Ann M. Johns,et al.  Text, Role and Context: Developing Academic Literacies , 1997 .