Discrimination in the Minimal Group Paradigm: Social Identity or Self-Interest?

Social identity theory (SIT) proposes that discrimination reflects competition for a positive social identity. In contrast, the behavioral interaction model (BIM) proposes that self-interest and interdependence of fate are at the root of discrimination. Using the minimal group paradigm, 94 undergraduates were randomly categorized as group members in a 2 (Interdependence: autonomous/interdependent) × 2 (In-group Identification: low/high) factorial design. Before distributing resources, autonomous participants were told they would personally receive the maximum number of points in the experiment independently of others' allocations. Interdependent participants received points depending on allocations made by in-group and out-group others. Contrary to BIM, autonomous individuals discriminated as much as interdependent respondents, and discrimination was unrelated to expectation of in-group reciprocity. In line with SIT, high in-group identifiers discriminated more than low in-group identifiers.

[1]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization , 1986 .

[2]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour , 1973 .

[3]  M. Karasawa,et al.  Toward an assessment of social identity: the structure of group identification and its effects on in-group evaluations. , 1991, The British journal of social psychology.

[4]  M. Billig.  Normative communication in a minimal intergroup situation , 1973 .

[5]  N. Branscombe,et al.  Influence of level of identification with a group and physiological arousal on perceived intergroup complexity. , 1995, The British journal of social psychology.

[6]  M. Hogg,et al.  Self‐esteem and intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm , 1991 .

[7]  Jacob M. Rabbie,et al.  Social identity theory: A conceptual and empirical critique from the perspective of a behavioural interaction model , 1989 .

[8]  John C. Turner,et al.  The social dimension: Social identification and psychological group formation , 1984 .

[9]  Jay W. Jackson,et al.  Realistic group conflict theory: A review and evaluation of the theoretical and empirical literature. , 1993 .

[10]  John C. Turner,et al.  Some comments on… ‘the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm’ , 1983 .

[11]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Minimal group situations and intergroup discrimination: Comments on the paper by Aschenbrenner and schaefer , 1980 .

[12]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism , 1979 .

[13]  R. Bourhis,et al.  Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations , 1991 .

[14]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Intergroup Relations in a Hospital Setting: A Further Test of Social Identity Theory , 1986 .

[15]  John Thibaut,et al.  On the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm , 1983 .

[16]  Daniel L. Wann,et al.  Collective self‐esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial , 1994 .

[17]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour: Does minimal intergroup discrimination make social identity more positive? , 1980 .

[18]  C. Kelly.  Intergroup differentiation in a political context , 1988 .

[19]  M. Diehl.  The Minimal Group Paradigm: Theoretical Explanations and Empirical Findings , 1990 .

[20]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour , 1971 .

[21]  L. Lemyre,et al.  Intergroup Discrimination and Self-Esteem in the Minimal Group Paradigm , 1985 .

[22]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Familiarity and categorization in intergroup behavior , 1974 .

[23]  Matthew G. Chin,et al.  The effects of intergroup discrimination and social values on level of self‐esteem in the minimal group paradigm , 1993 .

[24]  J. Turner,et al.  The role of demand characteristics in the social categorization paradigm , 1982 .

[25]  M. Brewer.  In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[26]  Itesh Sachdev,et al.  Status differenttals and intergroup behaviour , 1987 .