Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights

Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) is widely used in ranking one or more alternatives from a set of available alternatives with respect to multiple criteria. Inspired by MCDM to systematically evaluate alternatives under various criteria, we propose a new fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluating alternatives by integrating using subjective and objective weights. Most MCDM approaches consider only decision maker's subjective weights. However, the end-user attitude can be a key factor. We propose a novel approach that involves end-user into the whole decision making process. In this proposed approach, the subjective weights assigned by decision makers (DM) are normalized into a comparable scale. In addition, we also adopt end-user ratings as an objective weight based on Shannon's entropy theory. A closeness coefficient is defined to determine the ranking order of alternatives by calculating the distances to both ideal and negative-ideal solutions. A case study is performed showing how the propose method can be used for a software outsourcing problem. With our method, we provide decision makers more information to make more subtle decisions.

[1]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Maximum Entropy for Collaborative Filtering , 2004, UAI.

[2]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[3]  Douglas J. Miller,et al.  Maximum entropy econometrics: robust estimation with limited data , 1996 .

[4]  Hsu-Shih Shih,et al.  A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection , 2006, Math. Comput. Model..

[5]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[6]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory - and Its Applications , 1985 .

[7]  J. Cadzow Maximum Entropy Spectral Analysis , 2006 .

[8]  Rogério Cid Bastos,et al.  Fuzzy MCDM in election prediction , 2001, 2001 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. e-Systems and e-Man for Cybernetics in Cyberspace (Cat.No.01CH37236).

[9]  Richard Bellman,et al.  Decision-making in fuzzy environment , 2012 .

[10]  Evangelos Triantaphyllou,et al.  Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study , 2000 .

[11]  George Bojadziev,et al.  Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Logic, Applications , 1996, Advances in Fuzzy Systems - Applications and Theory.

[12]  Marc Roubens,et al.  Multiple criteria decision making , 1994 .

[13]  Hsuan-Shih Lee,et al.  Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making , 2007, Comput. Math. Appl..

[14]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Fuzzy MCDM approach to select service provider , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 2003. FUZZ '03..

[15]  Ronald Rosenfeld,et al.  Adaptive Statistical Language Modeling; A Maximum Entropy Approach , 1994 .

[16]  T. Chu,et al.  A Fuzzy TOPSIS Method for Robot Selection , 2003 .

[17]  C. Yeh,et al.  An algorithm for fuzzy multi-criteria decision making , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Processing Systems (Cat. No.97TH8335).

[18]  Y J Wang,et al.  FUZZY TOPSIS FOR MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING , 2003 .

[19]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[20]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[21]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[22]  C. Feng,et al.  Performance evaluation for airlines including the consideration of financial ratios , 2000 .