Environmental benefits and concerns on safety: communicating latest results on nanotechnology safety research—the project DaNa2.0

The use of nanotechnology and advanced materials promises to revolutionise many areas of technology and improve our daily life. In that respect, many positive effects on the environment are expected, either directly, by developing new technologies for remediation, filtering techniques or energy generation, or indirectly, by e.g. saving resources due to lower consumption of raw materials, or lower energy and fuel consumption due to reduced weight of vehicles. However, such beneficial effects of new technologies are often confronted by concerns regarding the safety of novel substances or materials. During the past 10 years, great effort has been put into research on potential hazards of nanomaterials towards environmental organisms. As the methodology for reliable assessment of nanomaterials was immature, many studies reporting contradictory results have been published, hindering both risk assessment for nanomaterials, as well as the knowledge communication to all involved stakeholders. Thus, DaNa2.0 serves as a platform to implement trusted knowledge on nanomaterials for an objective discussion.

[1]  K. Schirmer,et al.  Evaluating the cytotoxicity of palladium/magnetite nano-catalysts intended for wastewater treatment. , 2010, Environmental pollution.

[2]  Dana Kühnel,et al.  Latest research results on the effects of nanomaterials on humans and the environment: DaNa - Knowledge Base Nanomaterials , 2013 .

[3]  R. Schulz,et al.  The oxidized state of the nanocomposite Carbo-Iron® causes no adverse effects on growth, survival and differential gene expression in zebrafish. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  R. Lal,et al.  Potentials of engineered nanoparticles as fertilizers for increasing agronomic productions. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  Dana Kühnel,et al.  The OECD expert meeting on ecotoxicology and environmental fate--towards the development of improved OECD guidelines for the testing of nanomaterials. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  Sara Novak,et al.  An interlaboratory comparison of nanosilver characterisation and hazard identification: Harmonising techniques for high quality data. , 2016, Environment international.

[7]  Melanie Kah,et al.  Nanopesticides: State of Knowledge, Environmental Fate, and Exposure Modeling , 2013 .

[8]  Annegret Potthoff,et al.  Towards sensible toxicity testing for nanomaterials: proposal for the specification of test design , 2015, Science and technology of advanced materials.

[9]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  Nanopesticides: guiding principles for regulatory evaluation of environmental risks. , 2014, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[10]  Melanie Kah,et al.  Nanopesticide research: current trends and future priorities. , 2014, Environment international.

[11]  F. Kopinke,et al.  Carbo-Iron - An Fe/AC composite - As alternative to nano-iron for groundwater treatment. , 2012, Water research.

[12]  David B Warheit,et al.  How meaningful are risk determinations in the absence of a complete dataset? Making the case for publishing standardized test guideline and ‘no effect’ studies for evaluating the safety of nanoparticulates versus spurious ‘high effect’ results from single investigative studies , 2015, Science and technology of advanced materials.

[13]  K. Mackenzie,et al.  NOVEL NANO-CATALYSTS FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT , 2008 .

[14]  N. Klaas,et al.  Nanoscale zero-valent iron flakes for groundwater treatment , 2014, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[15]  Dana Kühnel,et al.  Environmental impacts of nanomaterials: providing comprehensive information on exposure, transport and ecotoxicity - the project DaNa2.0 , 2014, Environmental Sciences Europe.

[16]  Harald F Krug,et al.  Nanosafety research--are we on the right track? , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[17]  Claudia Fruijtier-Pölloth The safety of synthetic zeolites used in detergents , 2008, Archives of Toxicology.