Whole genome paired-end sequencing elucidates functional and phenotypic consequences of balanced chromosomal rearrangement in patients with developmental disorders

Background Balanced chromosomal rearrangements associated with abnormal phenotype are rare events, but may be challenging for genetic counselling, since molecular characterisation of breakpoints is not performed routinely. We used next-generation sequencing to characterise breakpoints of balanced chromosomal rearrangements at the molecular level in patients with intellectual disability and/or congenital anomalies. Methods Breakpoints were characterised by a paired-end low depth whole genome sequencing (WGS) strategy and validated by Sanger sequencing. Expression study of disrupted and neighbouring genes was performed by RT-qPCR from blood or lymphoblastoid cell line RNA. Results Among the 55 patients included (41 reciprocal translocations, 4 inversions, 2 insertions and 8 complex chromosomal rearrangements), we were able to detect 89% of chromosomal rearrangements (49/55). Molecular signatures at the breakpoints suggested that DNA breaks arose randomly and that there was no major influence of repeated elements. Non-homologous end-joining appeared as the main mechanism of repair (55% of rearrangements). A diagnosis could be established in 22/49 patients (44.8%), 15 by gene disruption (KANSL1, FOXP1, SPRED1, TLK2, MBD5, DMD, AUTS2, MEIS2, MEF2C, NRXN1, NFIX, SYNGAP1, GHR, ZMIZ1) and 7 by position effect (DLX5, MEF2C, BCL11B, SATB2, ZMIZ1). In addition, 16 new candidate genes were identified. Systematic gene expression studies further supported these results. We also showed the contribution of topologically associated domain maps to WGS data interpretation. Conclusion Paired-end WGS is a valid strategy and may be used for structural variation characterisation in a clinical setting.

[1]  De-Hua Cheng,et al.  Whole-genome mate-pair sequencing of apparently balanced chromosome rearrangements reveals complex structural variations: two case studies , 2020, Molecular Cytogenetics.

[2]  Patrick Callier,et al.  Genome sequencing in cytogenetics: Comparison of short‐read and linked‐read approaches for germline structural variant detection and characterization , 2020, Molecular genetics & genomic medicine.

[3]  H. Mefford,et al.  ZMIZ1 Variants Cause a Syndromic Neurodevelopmental Disorder. , 2019, American journal of human genetics.

[4]  Ryan L. Collins,et al.  Risks and Recommendations in Prenatally Detected De Novo Balanced Chromosomal Rearrangements from Assessment of Long-Term Outcomes. , 2018, American journal of human genetics.

[5]  Rachel L. Taylor,et al.  De Novo and Inherited Loss-of-Function Variants in TLK2: Clinical and Genotype-Phenotype Evaluation of a Distinct Neurodevelopmental Disorder , 2018, American journal of human genetics.

[6]  S. Mundlos,et al.  Polymer physics predicts the effects of structural variants on chromatin architecture , 2018, Nature Genetics.

[7]  Hui Jiang,et al.  Identification of Balanced Chromosomal Rearrangements Previously Unknown Among Participants in the 1000 Genomes Project: Implications for Interpretation of Structural Variation in Genomes and the Future of Clinical Cytogenetics , 2017, Genetics in Medicine.

[8]  S. Bicciato,et al.  Comparison of computational methods for Hi-C data analysis , 2017, Nature Methods.

[9]  M. Lieber,et al.  Non-homologous DNA end joining and alternative pathways to double-strand break repair , 2017, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[10]  J. Bakdash,et al.  Repeated Measures Correlation , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[11]  Yan Guo,et al.  Improvements and impacts of GRCh38 human reference on high throughput sequencing data analysis. , 2017, Genomics.

[12]  Daniel Nilsson,et al.  Whole‐Genome Sequencing of Cytogenetically Balanced Chromosome Translocations Identifies Potentially Pathological Gene Disruptions and Highlights the Importance of Microhomology in the Mechanism of Formation , 2017, Human mutation.

[13]  Xingzhi Xu,et al.  Microhomology-mediated end joining: new players join the team , 2017, Cell & Bioscience.

[14]  Donna M. Muzny,et al.  Resolution of Disease Phenotypes Resulting from Multilocus Genomic Variation , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Edwin Cuppen,et al.  The genomic landscape of balanced cytogenetic abnormalities associated with human congenital anomalies , 2016, Nature Genetics.

[16]  J. Lupski,et al.  Mechanisms underlying structural variant formation in genomic disorders , 2016, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[17]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping , 2015, Cell.

[18]  A. Rivas-Estilla,et al.  A de novo t(10;19)(q22.3;q13.33) leads to ZMIZ1/PRR12 reciprocal fusion transcripts in a girl with intellectual disability and neuropsychiatric alterations , 2015, neurogenetics.

[19]  A. Visel,et al.  Disruptions of Topological Chromatin Domains Cause Pathogenic Rewiring of Gene-Enhancer Interactions , 2015, Cell.

[20]  Neva C. Durand,et al.  A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping , 2014, Cell.

[21]  L. Vissers,et al.  Genome sequencing identifies major causes of severe intellectual disability , 2014, Nature.

[22]  E. Liu,et al.  Detection of Chromosomal Breakpoints in Patients with Developmental Delay and Speech Disorders , 2014, PloS one.

[23]  D. Sheer,et al.  The role of microhomology in genomic structural variation. , 2014, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[24]  Edwin Cuppen,et al.  Mate pair sequencing for the detection of chromosomal aberrations in patients with intellectual disability and congenital malformations , 2013, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[25]  J. Carpten,et al.  Long insert whole genome sequencing for copy number variant and translocation detection , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[26]  Joshua L. Deignan,et al.  ACMG clinical laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing , 2013, Genetics in Medicine.

[27]  Jennifer E. Phillips-Cremins,et al.  Architectural Protein Subclasses Shape 3D Organization of Genomes during Lineage Commitment , 2013, Cell.

[28]  Heng Li Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM , 2013, 1303.3997.

[29]  M. Till,et al.  Breakpoint mapping by next generation sequencing reveals causative gene disruption in patients carrying apparently balanced chromosome rearrangements with intellectual deficiency and/or congenital malformations , 2013, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[30]  Toshiro K. Ohsumi,et al.  Sequencing Chromosomal Abnormalities Reveals Neurodevelopmental Loci that Confer Risk across Diagnostic Boundaries , 2012, Cell.

[31]  Helga Thorvaldsdóttir,et al.  Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration , 2012, Briefings Bioinform..

[32]  Ira M. Hall,et al.  Complex reorganization and predominant non-homologous repair following chromosomal breakage in karyotypically balanced germline rearrangements and transgenic integration , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[33]  L. Shaffer,et al.  Gametogenesis and Conception, Pregnancy Loss and Infertility , 2011 .

[34]  K. Devriendt,et al.  A Balanced Translocation t(6;14)(q25.3;q13.2) Leading to Reciprocal Fusion Transcripts in a Patient with Intellectual Disability and Agenesis of Corpus Callosum , 2010, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[35]  Reinhard Ullmann,et al.  Breakpoint analysis of balanced chromosome rearrangements by next-generation paired-end sequencing , 2010, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[36]  L. Pasquier,et al.  Cryptic genomic imbalances in de novo and inherited apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangements: array CGH study of 47 unrelated cases. , 2009, European journal of medical genetics.

[37]  R. Wilson,et al.  BreakDancer: An algorithm for high resolution mapping of genomic structural variation , 2009, Nature Methods.

[38]  J. Lupski,et al.  The DNA replication FoSTeS/MMBIR mechanism can generate genomic, genic and exonic complex rearrangements in humans , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[39]  Gonçalo R. Abecasis,et al.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools , 2009, Bioinform..

[40]  J. Clayton-Smith,et al.  FISH mapping of de novo apparently balanced chromosome rearrangements identifies characteristics associated with phenotypic abnormality. , 2008, American journal of human genetics.

[41]  Philip M. Kim,et al.  Paired-End Mapping Reveals Extensive Structural Variation in the Human Genome , 2007, Science.

[42]  Charlotte N. Henrichsen,et al.  Submicroscopic deletion in patients with Williams-Beuren syndrome influences expression levels of the nonhemizygous flanking genes. , 2006, American journal of human genetics.

[43]  N. Carter,et al.  The complex nature of constitutional de novo apparently balanced translocations in patients presenting with abnormal phenotypes , 2005, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[44]  E. Haan,et al.  Disruption of the serine/threonine kinase 9 gene causes severe X-linked infantile spasms and mental retardation. , 2003, American journal of human genetics.

[45]  Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. , 2001, Methods.

[46]  D. Warburton,et al.  De novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints. , 1991, American journal of human genetics.

[47]  L. Shaffer,et al.  Chromosome Abnormalities and Genetic Counseling , 1989 .

[48]  K. Fischbeck,et al.  Molecular analysis of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy region using pulsed field gel electrophoresis , 1987, Cell.

[49]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[50]  L. Lettice,et al.  Long-range gene control and genetic disease. , 2008, Advances in genetics.