Analytical solution of seismic response of base‐isolated structure with supplemental inerter

Closed‐form solutions are derived for the modal characteristics and seismic response of a base‐isolated structure equipped with additional inerters. By simplifying the structure‐isolator‐inerter system in terms of the two‐degree‐of‐freedom (2DOF) model, the modal frequencies, mode shapes, damping ratios, and participation factors of the system are derived. Consequently, analytical seismic response solutions are formulated by the modal superposition method. Utilizing these analytical solutions, an extensive parametric study has been carried out to investigate the effect of supplement inerters on both the modal characteristics and seismic response of the structure‐isolator‐inerter system. There is a critical inertance leading to the zero second modal participation factor (ie, the disappearance of the second modal response). The associated critical inertance ratio is derived in closed form as well. Moreover, it is observed that the reduction of deformation of isolators by increasing the inertance may be offset by the increase in relative displacements of the superstructure. To circumvent this adverse effect, an optimal range of inertance is identified whereby both the deformation of isolators and the relative displacement of the superstructure are mitigated concurrently.

[1]  C. Ventura,et al.  MODAL ANALYSIS OF NON-CLASSICALLY DAMPED LINEAR SYSTEMS , 1986 .

[2]  James M. Kelly,et al.  Earthquake-Resistant Design with Rubber , 1993 .

[3]  Malcolm C. Smith Synthesis of mechanical networks: the inerter , 2002, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[4]  S. Evangelou,et al.  Control of motorcycle steering instabilities , 2006, IEEE Control Systems.

[5]  Hirokazu Iemura,et al.  Application of angular‐mass dampers to base‐isolated benchmark building , 2008 .

[6]  Stefano Silvestri,et al.  Chairman della "S14 Seismic Design Optimization" in sostituzione del Prof. T. Trombetti alla 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China , 2008 .

[7]  M.C. Smith,et al.  The missing mechanical circuit element , 2009, IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine.

[8]  W.K.S. Tang,et al.  Suppressing electromagnetic interference in direct current converters , 2009, IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine.

[9]  F-C Wang,et al.  Building suspensions with inerters , 2010 .

[10]  Masato Saitoh,et al.  On the performance of gyro‐mass devices for displacement mitigation in base isolation systems , 2012 .

[11]  Izuru Takewaki,et al.  Fundamental mechanism of earthquake response reduction in building structures with inertial dampers , 2012 .

[12]  Fu-Cheng Wang,et al.  Stability and performance analysis of a full-train system with inerters , 2012 .

[13]  Kohju Ikago,et al.  Seismic control of single‐degree‐of‐freedom structure using tuned viscous mass damper , 2012 .

[14]  Kohju Ikago,et al.  Modal Response Characteristics of a Multiple-Degree-Of-Freedom Structure Incorporated with Tuned Viscous Mass Dampers , 2012 .

[15]  Yinlong Hu,et al.  Influence of inerter on natural frequencies of vibration systems , 2014 .

[16]  David J. Wagg,et al.  Using an inerter‐based device for structural vibration suppression , 2014 .

[17]  Agathoklis Giaralis,et al.  Optimal design of a novel tuned mass-damper–inerter (TMDI) passive vibration control configuration for stochastically support-excited structural systems , 2014 .

[18]  Zhan Shu,et al.  Passive vehicle suspensions employing inerters with multiple performance requirements , 2014 .

[19]  Zhao Chen,et al.  Viscoelastically Supported Viscous Mass Damper Incorporated into a Seismic Isolation System , 2016 .

[20]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Seismic protection of structures with supplemental rotational inertia , 2016 .

[21]  D. De Domenico,et al.  An enhanced base isolation system equipped with optimal tuned mass damper inerter (TMDI) , 2018 .