Taking the Leap: From Pilot Project to Wide-Scale Implementation of the Strategic Training Initiative in Community Supervision (STICS)

Meta-analytic reviews of the offender rehabilitation literature have consistently demonstrated that treatment can reduce recidivism. The majority of the treatment programs in these reviews consist of small-scale demonstration projects (N < 100). Larger interventions, although effective in reducing recidivism, do not produce as robust effects as the smaller demonstration projects. The reasons for this may have to do more with quality implementation issues rather than with the treatment itself. This article describes the implementation plans for a previously validated probation officer training intervention that is being introduced across a large jurisdiction. The steps taken to ensure quality implementation are outlined and obstacles that arose are discussed.

[1]  Aleksandra Nesovic,et al.  Psychometric evaluation of the Correctional Program Assessment Inventory (CPAI) , 2003 .

[2]  Pamela M. Yates,et al.  Reconstructing the Risk-Need-Responsivity model: A theoretical elaboration and evaluation , 2007 .

[3]  R. K. Hanson The Development of a Brief Actuarial Risk Scale for Sexual Offense Recidivism 1997-04 By , 2002 .

[4]  Christopher T. Lowenkamp,et al.  DOES CORRECTIONAL PROGRAM QUALITY REALLY MATTER? THE IMPACT OF ADHERING TO THE PRINCIPLES OF EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION* , 2006 .

[5]  James Bonta,et al.  The psychology of criminal conduct, 5th ed. , 2010 .

[6]  David P. Farrington,et al.  Offender Rehabilitation in Practice: Implementing and Evaluating Effective Programs , 2001 .

[7]  K. Swartz,et al.  Validating the Principles of Effective Intervention: A Systematic Review of the Contributions of Meta-Analysis in the Field of Corrections , 2009 .

[8]  Lamar T. Empey,et al.  The effectiveness of correctional treatment : a survey of treatment evaluation studies , 1976 .

[9]  James Bonta,et al.  An Experimental Demonstration of Training Probation Officers in Evidence-Based Community Supervision , 2011 .

[10]  James Bonta,et al.  A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of an Intensive Rehabilitation Supervision Program , 2000 .

[11]  Francis T. Cullen,et al.  BEYOND ADOLESCENCE‐LIMITED CRIMINOLOGY: CHOOSING OUR FUTURE—THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CRIMINOLOGY 2010 SUTHERLAND ADDRESS* , 2011 .

[12]  D. A. Andrews,et al.  The level of service inventory – revised , 1995 .

[13]  James Bonta,et al.  Exploring the Black Box of Community Supervision , 2008 .

[14]  G. Harris,et al.  Allegiance or Fidelity? A Clarifying Reply , 2010 .

[15]  Advances in offender assessment and rehabilitation: Contributions of the risk–needs–responsivity approach , 2004 .

[16]  Bob Ross,et al.  Effective Correctional Treatment: Bibliotherapy for Cynics , 1979 .

[17]  James Bonta,et al.  Sources of Variability in Estimates of Predictive Validity , 2011 .

[18]  T. Palmer Martinson Revisited , 1975 .

[19]  Robert D. Hoge,et al.  DOES CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT WORK? A CLINICALLY RELEVANT AND PSYCHOLOGICALLY INFORMED META-ANALYSIS * , 1990 .

[20]  D. A. Andrews,et al.  Classification for Effective Rehabilitation , 1990 .

[21]  James Bonta,et al.  Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. , 2010 .

[22]  Antonio Andrés Pueyo,et al.  THE PSYCHOLOGY OF CRIMINAL CONDUCT , 2007 .

[23]  P. Gendreau,et al.  The Implementation and Maintenance of Quality Services in Offender Rehabilitation Programmes , 2008 .

[24]  C. Dowden,et al.  Managing correctional treatment for reduced recidivism: A meta‐analytic review of programme integrity , 2005 .

[25]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  The Primary Factors that Characterize Effective Interventions with Juvenile Offenders: A Meta-Analytic Overview , 2009 .

[26]  Christopher T. Lowenkamp,et al.  Community Corrections Facilities for Juvenile Offenders in Ohio , 2010 .

[27]  Anthony Petrosino,et al.  The impact of program developers as evaluators on criminal recidivism: Results from meta-analyses of experimental and quasi-experimental research , 2005 .