Bur Technique and Chisel Mallet Technique in Impacted 3rd Molar

Surgical removal of impacted third molar is one of the common surgical procedures carried out in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery set up. This study aimed at clinically assessing the three different surgical techniques (lingual split, using chisel and mallet, buccal approach techniques, using rotary instruments used in the removal of impacted mandibular third molars

[1]  M. T. Simpson,et al.  The effect of dexamethasone on neurapraxia following third molar surgery. , 1989, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[2]  J. Rood.  Degrees of injury to the inferior alveolar nerve sustained during the removal of impacted mandibular third molars by the lingual split technique. , 1983, The British journal of oral surgery.

[3]  J. Jacoway,et al.  Clinical applications of ultrasonic instrumentation in the surgical removal of bone. , 1981, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[4]  Wood Gd,et al.  A comparison of three methods of measuring maximal opening of the mouth. , 1979, Journal of oral surgery.

[5]  H. S. Breytenbach.  Objective measurement of post-operative swelling. , 1978, International journal of oral surgery.

[6]  J. Rud.  The split-bone technic for removal of impacted mandibular third molars. , 1970, Journal of oral surgery.

[7]  L. Szmyd,et al.  Crevicular depth of the second molar in impacted third molar surgery. , 1962, Journal of oral surgery, anesthesia, and hospital dental service.

[8]  S. Mohammad,et al.  Techniques in the removal of impacted mandibular third molar: A comparative study , 2013 .

[9]  A. Macgregor,et al.  Value of penicillin in the prevention of pain, swelling and trismus following the removal of ectopic mandibular third molars. , 1980, International journal of oral surgery.

[10]  H. Birn.  Etiology and pathogenesis of fibrinolytic alveolitis (“dry socket”) , 1973 .