How well does charge reparametrisation account for solvent screening in molecular mechanics calculations? The example of myosin

The rate constant of an enzyme-catalysed reaction is one of the major target properties to understand protein function. Atomic-detail computer simulations can in principle be used to estimate rate constants from the energy profile along the reaction coordinate. For such simulations, molecular mechanics is combined with a quantum description of the reaction process. In molecular mechanics calculations, the electrostatic field is represented by the Coulomb potential of partial atomic charges which have been parametrised for small building blocks in vacuum and transferred to the macromolecule. In aqueous solution, however, the electrostatic interactions are affected by the solvent polarization. While this can be described by numerically solving the Poisson-Boltzmann equation, it is computationally expensive. A simple approximation to this is to optimally reproduce the electrostatic potential in solution by reparametrising the partial atomic charges in such a way that a simple Coulomb potential can still be used. Such a procedure would allow to perform fast calculations of reaction processes in proteins while accounting for the solvent screening effect. Here, this method is tested on myosin, a motor protein that is both an enzyme and exists in very different conformations.

[1]  M. Karplus,et al.  Solution conformations and thermodynamics of structured peptides: molecular dynamics simulation with an implicit solvation model. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  B. Honig,et al.  A rapid finite difference algorithm, utilizing successive over‐relaxation to solve the Poisson–Boltzmann equation , 1991 .

[3]  M. Karplus,et al.  A Comprehensive Analytical Treatment of Continuum Electrostatics , 1996 .

[4]  W. C. Still,et al.  The GB/SA Continuum Model for Solvation. A Fast Analytical Method for the Calculation of Approximate Born Radii , 1997 .

[5]  K. Tasaki,et al.  Observations concerning the treatment of long‐range interactions in molecular dynamics simulations , 1993, J. Comput. Chem..

[6]  M. Karplus,et al.  Promoting modes and demoting modes in enzyme-catalyzed proton transfer reactions: A study of models and realistic systems , 2002 .

[7]  H M Holden,et al.  X-ray structures of the myosin motor domain of Dictyostelium discoideum complexed with MgADP.BeFx and MgADP.AlF4-. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[8]  A. Leach Molecular Modelling: Principles and Applications , 1996 .

[9]  B. Dominy,et al.  Development of a generalized Born model parameterization for proteins and nucleic acids , 1999 .

[10]  L. R. Scott,et al.  Electrostatics and diffusion of molecules in solution: simulations with the University of Houston Brownian dynamics program , 1995 .

[11]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[12]  D. Case,et al.  Generalized born models of macromolecular solvation effects. , 2000, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[13]  B. Honig,et al.  Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. , 1995, Science.

[14]  T. Darden,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules: long-range electrostatic effects. , 1999, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[15]  Bernard R. Brooks,et al.  New spherical‐cutoff methods for long‐range forces in macromolecular simulation , 1994, J. Comput. Chem..

[16]  K C Holmes,et al.  Structural mechanism of muscle contraction. , 1999, Annual review of biochemistry.

[17]  M. Karplus,et al.  Docking by Monte Carlo minimization with a solvation correction: Application to an FKBP—substrate complex , 1997 .

[18]  M. Karplus,et al.  Conjugate peak refinement: an algorithm for finding reaction paths and accurate transition states in systems with many degrees of freedom , 1992 .

[19]  M. Karplus,et al.  A mechanism for rotamase catalysis by the FK506 binding protein (FKBP). , 1993, Biochemistry.