Irrigation and nitrogen effects on seed cotton yield, water productivity and yield response factor in semi-arid environment

The study of irrigation technologies for growing cotton in the Brazilian northeastern semi-arid region is very important to better understand the water-soil-plant-atmosphere interactions. Modern varieties are adapted to these conditions, reaching their maximum yield potential. In irrigated areas, application of nitrogen fertilizer is also necessary to keep up cotton to its maximum productive potential. The ideal conditions should be offered to the crop, where this knowledge is still scarce in this region. The objective of this work was to evaluate the effects of water levels and N rates on growth and yield of cotton (‘BRS 286’) in semi-arid condition. The experiment consisted of a factorial combination of four irrigation levels [40, 70, 100, and 130% ETc (crop evapotranspiration)] and four N rates (0, 70, 140, and 210 kg N ha -1 ), in a randomized complete block design with four replicates. Seed cotton yield and growth parameters were determined at harvest. Irrigation and N fertilization influenced growth parameters and cotton yield. The highest seed cotton yield (5707 kg ha -1 ) was reached with 130% ETc and 210 kg N ha -1 . The maximum N agronomic efficiency was achieved at 140 kg N ha -1 . The treatment 70% ETc showed significant benefits in terms of irrigation water savings, with 0.587 kg m -3 , indicating the possibility of use to deficit irrigation under water scarcity conditions. The seasonal yield response factor (Ky) was 0.70, demonstrating that the ‘BRS 286’ was water stress-tolerant crop.

[1]  Y. Singh,et al.  Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effects on seed cotton yield, water productivity and yield response factor in shallow soils of semi-arid environment. , 2010 .

[2]  D. R. Nielsen,et al.  Crop Yield Response to Deficit Irrigation , 2012 .

[3]  David D. Tarkalson,et al.  Yield response of corn to deficit irrigation in a semiarid climate , 2006 .

[4]  H. S. Thind,et al.  Cotton yield and water use efficiency at various levels of water and N through drip irrigation under two methods of planting , 2005 .

[5]  W. Pettigrew,et al.  Moisture deficit effects on cotton lint yield, yield components, and boll distribution , 2004 .

[6]  P. D. Azevedo,et al.  Evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of irrigated cotton crop, cultivar BRS-200 Marrom , 2010 .

[7]  Itamar Rosa Teixeira,et al.  Crescimento e produtividade de algodoeiro submetido a cloreto de mepiquat e doses de nitrogênio , 2008 .

[8]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements , 1998 .

[9]  S. Onder,et al.  Effect of different irrigation water level on cotton yield and yield components , 2009 .

[10]  Ersel Yilmaz,et al.  Effects of Deficit Drip Irrigation Ratios on Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Yield and Fibre Quality , 2009 .

[11]  D. Raes,et al.  Crop yield response to water , 2012 .

[12]  R. Raja,et al.  Evapo-transpiration based scheduling of irrigation through drip for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) , 2006 .

[13]  L. H. C. Anjos,et al.  Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. , 2006 .

[14]  Daniel Furtado Ferreira,et al.  Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system , 2011 .

[15]  J. F. Medeiros,et al.  Response of watermelon cultivated under different levels of water and nitrogen , 2008 .

[16]  Ersel Yilmaz,et al.  Different drip irrigation regimes affect cotton yield, water use efficiency and fiber quality in western Turkey , 2009 .

[17]  C. W. Thornthwaite An approach toward a rational classification of climate. , 1948 .

[18]  Öner Çetin,et al.  Effects of different irrigation methods on shedding and yield of cotton , 2002 .

[19]  S. Kathju,et al.  Influence of nitrogen on Indian mustard grown underdifferent levels of stored soil moisture , 1995 .

[20]  Anil Sood,et al.  Crop water productivity of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system as influenced by deficit irrigation, soil texture and precipitation , 2006 .

[21]  A. B. Onken,et al.  Nitrogen Response in Cotton as Affected by Tillage System and Irrigation Level , 2001 .

[22]  M. Rashidi,et al.  Effect of Different Application Rates of Boron on Yield and Quality of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) , 2011 .

[23]  A. Daccache,et al.  Water use and lint yield response of drip irrigated cotton to the length of irrigation season , 2006 .

[24]  E. Yilmaz,et al.  Water-yield relation and water use efficiency of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and second crop corn (Zea mays L.) in western Turkey , 2006 .

[25]  B. Clothier,et al.  Deficit irrigation and partial rootzone drying maintain fruit dry mass and enhance fruit quality in ‘Petopride’ processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum, Mill.) , 2003 .

[26]  F. Fritschi,et al.  Response of Irrigated Acala and Pima Cotton to Nitrogen Fertilization , 2003, Agronomy Journal.

[27]  M. Janat,et al.  Assessment of yield and water use efficiency of drip-irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) as affected by deficit irrigation , 2011, Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry.

[28]  J. F. Medeiros,et al.  Resposta de plantas de melancia cultivadas sob diferentes níveis de água e de nitrogênio , 2008 .