The design of long‐term effective uranium bioremediation strategy using a community metabolic model

Acetate amendment at uranium contaminated sites in Rifle, CO. leads to an initial bloom of Geobacter accompanied by the removal of U(VI) from the groundwater, followed by an increase of sulfate‐reducing bacteria (SRBs) which are poor reducers of U(VI). One of the challenges associated with bioremediation is the decay in Geobacter abundance, which has been attributed to the depletion of bio‐accessible Fe(III), motivating the investigation of simultaneous amendments of acetate and Fe(III) as an alternative bioremediation strategy. In order to understand the community metabolism of Geobacter and SRBs during artificial substrate amendment, we have created a genome‐scale dynamic community model of Geobacter and SRBs using the previously described Dynamic Multi‐species Metabolic Modeling framework. Optimization techniques are used to determine the optimal acetate and Fe(III) addition profile. Field‐scale simulation of acetate addition accurately predicted the in situ data. The simulations suggest that batch amendment of Fe(III) along with continuous acetate addition is insufficient to promote long‐term bioremediation, while continuous amendment of Fe(III) along with continuous acetate addition is sufficient to promote long‐term bioremediation. By computationally minimizing the acetate and Fe(III) addition rates as well as the difference between the predicted and target uranium concentration, we showed that it is possible to maintain the uranium concentration below the environmental safety standard while minimizing the cost of chemical additions. These simulations show that simultaneous addition of acetate and Fe(III) has the potential to be an effective uranium bioremediation strategy. They also show that computational modeling of microbial community is an important tool to design effective strategies for practical applications in environmental biotechnology. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012; 109: 2475–2483. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  R. Mahadevan,et al.  Model‐based analysis of the role of biological, hydrological and geochemical factors affecting uranium bioremediation , 2011, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[2]  Radhakrishnan Mahadevan,et al.  Genome-scale dynamic modeling of the competition between Rhodoferax and Geobacter in anoxic subsurface environments , 2011, The ISME Journal.

[3]  D. Lovley,et al.  Reduction of uranium by cytochrome c3 of Desulfovibrio vulgaris , 1993, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[4]  J. Komlos,et al.  Microbial reduction of uranium under iron- and sulfate-reducing conditions: Effect of amended goethite on microbial community composition and dynamics. , 2010, Water research.

[5]  Timothy Scheibe,et al.  Conceptual and numerical model of uranium(VI) reductive immobilization in fractured subsurface sediments. , 2005, Chemosphere.

[6]  Radhakrishnan Mahadevan,et al.  Genome-scale metabolic modeling of a clostridial co-culture for consolidated bioprocessing. , 2010, Biotechnology journal.

[7]  D. Lovley,et al.  Competitive Exclusion of Sulfate Reduction by Fe(lll)‐Reducing Bacteria: A Mechanism for Producing Discrete Zones of High‐Iron Ground Water , 1992 .

[8]  P. Kitanidis,et al.  Modeling in-situ uranium(VI) bioreduction by sulfate-reducing bacteria. , 2007, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[9]  B. Palsson,et al.  In situ to in silico and back: elucidating the physiology and ecology of Geobacter spp. using genome-scale modelling , 2011, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[10]  R. Mahadevan,et al.  Integrative analysis of the interactions between Geobacter spp. and sulfate-reducing bacteria during uranium bioremediation , 2011 .

[11]  A. Zehnder,et al.  Kinetics of Sulfate and Acetate Uptake by Desulfobacter postgatei , 1984, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[12]  Mehdi Nemati,et al.  A kinetic study on anaerobic reduction of sulphate. Part I: Effect of sulphate concentration , 2002 .

[13]  Jun Sun,et al.  Genome-scale constraint-based modeling of Geobacter metallireducens , 2009, BMC Systems Biology.

[14]  Timothy Scheibe,et al.  Supplemental material: Transport and biogeochemical reaction of metals in a physically and chemically heterogeneous aquifer , 2006, Geosphere.

[15]  Radhakrishnan Mahadevan,et al.  In situ to in silico and back: elucidating the physiology and ecology of Geobacter spp. using genome-scale modelling , 2011, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[16]  Yilin Fang,et al.  Uranium removal from groundwater via in situ biostimulation: Field-scale modeling of transport and biological processes. , 2007, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[17]  R. Mahadevan,et al.  Modeling and sensitivity analysis of electron capacitance for Geobacter in sedimentary environments. , 2010, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[18]  Radhakrishnan Mahadevan,et al.  Direct coupling of a genome-scale microbial in silico model and a groundwater reactive transport model. , 2011, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[19]  Radhakrishnan Mahadevan,et al.  Characterizing the Metabolism of Dehalococcoides with a Constraint-Based Model , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  R. Mahadevan,et al.  Integrative analysis of Geobacter spp. and sulfate-reducing bacteria during uranium bioremediation , 2012 .

[21]  Philip E. Long,et al.  Microbiological and Geochemical Heterogeneity in an In Situ Uranium Bioremediation Field Site , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[22]  R. Sanford,et al.  Origin of microbiological zoning in groundwater flows , 2008 .

[23]  C. Criddle,et al.  Reduction of uranium(VI) by soluble iron(II) conforms with thermodynamic predictions. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  Edward R. Landa,et al.  Microbial reduction of uranium , 1991, Nature.

[25]  J. Komlos,et al.  Long-term dynamics of uranium reduction/reoxidation under low sulfate conditions , 2008 .

[26]  A. M. Solanas,et al.  Bacterial Community Dynamics and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Degradation during Bioremediation of Heavily Creosote-Contaminated Soil , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[27]  Costas D. Maranas,et al.  OptCom: A Multi-Level Optimization Framework for the Metabolic Modeling and Analysis of Microbial Communities , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[28]  R. Sanford,et al.  Hexavalent uranium supports growth of Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans and Geobacter spp. with lower than predicted biomass yields. , 2007, Environmental microbiology.

[29]  B. Palsson,et al.  Characterization of Metabolism in the Fe(III)-Reducing Organism Geobacter sulfurreducens by Constraint-Based Modeling , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[30]  Donald R. Metzler,et al.  Stimulating the In Situ Activity of Geobacter Species To Remove Uranium from the Groundwater of a Uranium-Contaminated Aquifer , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[31]  Ye Deng,et al.  Dynamics of Microbial Community Composition and Function during In Situ Bioremediation of a Uranium-Contaminated Aquifer , 2011, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[32]  Radhakrishnan Mahadevan,et al.  Computational and Experimental Analysis of Redundancy in the Central Metabolism of Geobacter sulfurreducens , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[33]  S. Kelly,et al.  Extracellular reduction of uranium via Geobacter conductive pili as a protective cellular mechanism , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  J. Komlos,et al.  Effect of sulfate on the simultaneous bioreduction of iron and uranium. , 2008, Journal of environmental quality.

[35]  James A. Davis,et al.  Acetate Availability and its Influence on Sustainable Bioremediation of Uranium-Contaminated Groundwater , 2011 .

[36]  K. Williams,et al.  Influence of heterogeneous ammonium availability on bacterial community structure and the expression of nitrogen fixation and ammonium transporter genes during in situ bioremediation of uranium-contaminated groundwater. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[37]  D. Lovley,et al.  Molecular Analysis of the Metabolic Rates of Discrete Subsurface Populations of Sulfate Reducers , 2011, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.