Instrumental or emotional evaluations: what determines preferences?

The present study investigated the separability of two evaluative aspects, instrumental and emotional utilities, and tested the hypothesis that situational context influences the relative impact of these evaluations in decision making. Twenty-nine subjects rank ordered eight options according to their preferences. The options were hypothetical prizes the subjects could win, either in a mail lottery (private context) or in a TV show (public context). Subjects rated all options on utility scales and indicated their emotional associations. It was hypothesized that in the private context condition subjects' preferences were more influenced by emotions, whereas due to justification demands, preferences were more influenced by instrumental considerations in the public context condition. A multidimensional preference analysis yielded two dimensions. The second of these dimensions distinguished between experimental conditions. An individual differences scaling analysis yielded significantly higher subject weights for the second dimension in the public context group. The first dimension could be interpreted as mapping positive versus negative emotions, whereas the second dimension reflected instrumental evaluations. Regression analyses indicate that both instrumental and emotional evaluations significantly contribute in predicting preferences, but that the relation between preferences and evaluative dimensions is only indirect.

[1]  R. Lazarus.  From psychological stress to the emotions: a history of changing outlooks. , 1993, Annual review of psychology.

[2]  David E. Bell,et al.  Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty , 1982, Oper. Res..

[3]  B. Burns.  Percepts, concepts, and categories : the representation and processing of information , 1992 .

[4]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Multidimensional Scaling: Concepts and Applications , 1989 .

[5]  J. Beckmann,et al.  Action control : from cognition to behavior , 1985 .

[6]  Forrest W. Young.  Multidimensional Scaling: History, Theory, and Applications , 1987 .

[7]  J. Baron,et al.  The effect of normative beliefs on anticipated emotions. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  R. Sugden,et al.  Testing for Regret and Disappointment in Choice under Uncertainty , 1987 .

[9]  A. Tversky,et al.  Representations of perceptions of risks , 1984 .

[10]  Phipps Arabie,et al.  Some current models for the perception and judgment of risk , 1988 .

[11]  R. Nosofsky.  Similarity Scaling and Cognitive Process Models , 1992 .

[12]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives , 1993 .

[13]  A. Tesser,et al.  The effects of affective-cognitive consistency and thought on the attitude-behavior relation , 1989 .

[14]  D. Kahneman.  Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. , 1992 .

[15]  Charles Vlek,et al.  Judging risks and benefits in the small and in the large , 1981 .

[16]  J. Chang,et al.  Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition , 1970 .

[17]  Steven J. Breckler,et al.  Affect versus evaluation in the structure of attitudes , 1989 .

[18]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[19]  R. Abrams,et al.  Psychological sources of ambiguity avoidance , 1986 .

[20]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[21]  R. Hogarth.  Insights in Decision Making , 1990 .

[22]  K. Oatley,et al.  Human emotions: function and dysfunction. , 1992, Annual review of psychology.

[23]  Michael D. Johnson.  Consumer Choice Strategies for Comparing Noncomparable Alternatives , 1984 .

[24]  Lola L. Lopes,et al.  [Advances in Experimental Social Psychology] Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Volume 20 Volume 20 || Between Hope and Fear: The Psychology of Risk , 1987 .

[25]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. , 1992 .

[26]  J van der Pligt,et al.  Anticipated affective reactions and prevention of AIDS. , 1995, The British journal of social psychology.

[27]  Hans-Rüdiger Pfister,et al.  The function of concrete emotions in rational decision making , 1992 .

[28]  David E. Bell,et al.  Disappointment in Decision Making Under Uncertainty , 1985, Oper. Res..

[29]  P. Tetlock.  The Impact of Accountability on Judgment and Choice: Toward A Social Contingency Model , 1992 .

[30]  R. Sugden.  Regret, recrimination and rationality , 1985 .

[31]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[32]  Thomas E. Nygren.  The Relationship Between the Perceived Risk and Attractiveness of Gambles: A Multidimensional Analysis , 1977 .

[33]  P. Fishburn.  Decision Making: NORMATIVE THEORIES OF DECISION MAKING UNDER RISK AND UNDER UNCERTAINTY , 1988 .

[34]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  The Cognitive Structure of Emotions , 1988 .

[35]  D. E. Bell,et al.  Decision making: Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions. , 1990 .

[36]  R. Oliver,et al.  Assessing the Dimensionality and Structure of the Consumption Experience: Evaluation, Feeling, and Satisfaction , 1993 .

[37]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Nonconsequentialist decisions. Commentaries. Author's reply , 1994 .

[38]  O. Svenson.  Process descriptions of decision making. , 1979 .

[39]  Geoffrey N. Soutar,et al.  ANALYZING PREFERENCES FOR INVESTMENT PROJECTS: A MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING APPROACH* , 1980 .

[40]  B. Mellers,et al.  Similarity and Choice. , 1994 .