Genetic association between body composition measured by ultrasound and visual scores in Brazilian Nelore cattle.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the genetic variability of body composition traits measured by ultrasound, growth traits, and visual scores as well as their genetic associations in Nelore cattle. A total of 9,765, 13,285, 13,061, 12,811, 3,484, 3,484, 3,483, and 3,303 records of weight at time of ultrasound measure (W550), 12th-13th rib LM area (LMA), backfat thickness (BF), rump fat thickness (RF), visual scores for body structure (BS), finishing precocity (FP), muscling (MS), and sheath and navel characteristics (SN), respectively, were used. The model included contemporary group (defined as year and season of birth, sex, and management group) as a fixed effect and age of dam at calving and age of the animal (linear and quadratic effects) as covariates. The direct additive genetic effect was included as a random effect. The analyses also included 46,157 observations of BW adjusted to 120 d. The (co)variance components were estimated by the restricted maximum likelihood method using a multitrait animal model. Heritability estimates for W550, LMA, BF, RF, BS, FP, MS, and SN were 0.37 ± 0.030, 0.33 ± 0.03, 0.24 ± 0.02, 0.28 ± 0.03, 0.24 ± 0.04, 0.38 ± 0.05, 0.29 ± 0.05, and 0.38 ± 0.06, respectively. The estimated genetic correlations between visual scores and LMA were moderate and positive, ranging from 0.37 to 0.44. Similar results were obtained for the estimated genetic correlations between FP and MS with fat thickness measures (BF and RF). Low genetic correlations were estimated between SN and BS and between SN and the body composition traits, indicating that selection for body composition traits and BS will not affect sheath and navel size. The estimated genetic correlations between weight adjusted to 120 d of age (W120) and W550 and BS were high (0.87 and 0.91) and moderate with LMA (0.49 and 0.55), FP (0.37 and 0.41), and MS (0.47 and 0.55). The visual scores and ultrasound-measured body composition traits have enough genetic variation for selection purposes in Nelore cattle. Selection based on visual scores for body structure, finishing precocity and muscling should lead to desired changes in body composition albeit much more slowly than direct selection on those traits measured by ultrasound. Selection for heavier BW at early ages should lead to favorable changes in yearling LM area and visual scores.

[1]  R. Lôbo,et al.  Genetic correlations between categorical morphological traits in Nelore cattle by applying Bayesian analysis under a threshold animal model. , 2010, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[2]  S. Forni,et al.  Estimativas de parâmetros genéticos para os escores visuais e suas associações com peso corporal em bovinos de corte , 2010 .

[3]  L. G. Albuquerque,et al.  Genetic associations between carcass traits measured by real-time ultrasound and scrotal circumference and growth traits in Nelore cattle. , 2010, Journal of animal science.

[4]  S. Forni,et al.  Estimativas de herdabilidade e correlações para escores visuais, peso e altura ao sobreano em rebanhos da raça Nelore , 2009 .

[5]  Roberto Daniel Sainz,et al.  Correlações genéticas entre escores visuais e características de carcaça medidas por ultrassom em bovinos de corte , 2009 .

[6]  L. G. Albuquerque,et al.  Genetic and environmental factors affecting ultrasound measures of longissimus muscle area and backfat thickness in Nelore cattle , 2008 .

[7]  Karin Meyer,et al.  "WOMBAT" - DIGGING DEEP FOR QUANTITATIVE GENETIC ANALYSES BY RESTRICTED MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD , 2006 .

[8]  J. Giannotti,et al.  Meta-análise para estimativas de herdabilidade para características de crescimento em bovinos de corte , 2005 .

[9]  L. D. Van Vleck,et al.  Heritability estimates for carcass traits of cattle: a review. , 2004, Genetics and molecular research : GMR.

[10]  W. D. Busby,et al.  Use of ultrasound to predict body composition changes in steers at 100 and 65 days before slaughter. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[11]  L. D. Van Vleck,et al.  Genetic response to selection for weaning weight or yearling weight or yearling weight and muscle score in Hereford cattle: efficiency of gain, growth, and carcass characteristics. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[12]  E. J. Pollak,et al.  Genetic parameters for carcass traits and their live animal indicators in Simmental cattle. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[13]  T. Wheeler,et al.  Accuracy of predicting weight and percentage of beef carcass retail product using ultrasound and live animal measures. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[14]  A. Stelzleni,et al.  Genetic parameter estimates of yearling live animal ultrasonic measurements in Brangus cattle. , 2002, Journal of animal science.

[15]  C. J. Kaiser,et al.  Genetic and environmental parameters for steer ultrasound and carcass traits. , 2002, Journal of animal science.

[16]  G. Rouse,et al.  Genetic Relationship between Live Animal Ultrasound Measures and Scrotal Circumference in Yearling Angus Bulls , 2002 .

[17]  João Jorge Nassaralla Junior,et al.  Influência de Alguns Fatores de Ambiente sobre os Escores de Conformação, Precocidade e Musculatura à Desmama em um Rebanho da Raça Nelore , 2001 .

[18]  Meyer,et al.  ESTIMATES OF DIRECT AND MATERNAL GENETIC EFFECTS FOR WEIGHTS FROM BIRTH TO 600 DAYS OF AGE IN NELORE CATTLE , 2001 .

[19]  W H Upton,et al.  Genetic analyses of live-animal ultrasound and abattoir carcass traits in Australian Angus and Hereford cattle. , 2000, Journal of animal science.

[20]  J. K. Bertrand,et al.  Genetic parameter estimates for carcass and yearling ultrasound measurements in Brangus cattle. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[21]  R. Green,et al.  Genetic parameter estimates of live animal ultrasonic measures of retail yield indicators in yearling breeding cattle. , 1996, Journal of animal science.

[22]  D. L. Robinson,et al.  Live animal measurement of carcass traits: estimation of genetic parameters for beef cattle. , 1993, Journal of animal science.

[23]  H. Cross,et al.  Effect of frame size, muscle score, and external fatness on live and carcass value of beef cattle. , 1992, Journal of animal science.

[24]  M. Dikeman,et al.  Validation of real-time ultrasound technology for predicting fat thicknesses, longissimus muscle areas, and composition of Brangus bulls from 4 months to 2 years of age. , 1992, Journal of animal science.

[25]  K. Meyer Variance components due to direct and maternal effects for growth traits of Australian beef cattle , 1992 .

[26]  M. Dikeman,et al.  Validation of real-time ultrasound technology for predicting fat thicknesses and ribeye areas of Brangus bulls from four months to two years of age , 1991 .

[27]  A. Dobson An introduction to generalized linear models , 1991 .

[28]  J. R. Stouffer,et al.  Relationships of empty-body composition and fat distribution to live animal and carcass measurements in Bos indicus-Bos taurus crossbred cows. , 1990, Journal of animal science.

[29]  H. Fitzhugh,et al.  Factors influencing preputial prolapse in yearling bulls. , 1970, Journal of animal science.