195 Discovering the Sweet Spot of Human—Computer Configurations: A Case Study in Information Extraction

Interactive intelligent systems, i.e., interactive systems that employ AI technologies, are currently present in many parts of our social, public and political life. An issue reoccurring often in the development of these systems is the question regarding the level of appropriate human and computer contributions. Engineers and designers lack a way of systematically defining and delimiting possible options for designing such systems in terms of levels of automation. In this paper, we propose, apply and reflect on a method for human-computer configuration design. It supports the systematic investigation of the design space for developing an interactive intelligent system. We illustrate our method with a use case in the context of collaborative ideation. Here, we developed a tool for information extraction from idea content. A challenge was to find the right level of algorithmic support, whereby the quality of the information extraction should be as high as possible, but, at the same time, the human effort should be low. Such contradicting goals are often an issue in system development; thus, our method proposed helped us to conceptualize and explore the design space. Based on a critical reflection on our method application, we want to offer a complementary perspective to the value-centered design of interactive intelligent systems. Our overarching goal is to contribute to the design of so-called hybrid systems where humans and computers are partners.

[1]  Emily M. Bender,et al.  Data Statements for NLP: Toward Mitigating System Bias and Enabling Better Science , 2018 .

[2]  Sidney W. A. Dekker,et al.  MABA-MABA or Abracadabra? Progress on Human–Automation Co-ordination , 2002, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[3]  J. Johnson Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: The Sociology of a Door-Closer , 1988 .

[4]  L. Winner DO ARTIFACTS HAVE (cid:1) POLITICS? , 2022 .

[5]  Claudia Müller-Birn,et al.  Concept Validation during Collaborative Ideation and Its Effect on Ideation Outcome , 2018, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[6]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[7]  John Riedl,et al.  Introduction to the Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems , 2011, ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst..

[8]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[9]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Uncertainty, Action, and Interaction: In Pursuit of Mixed-Initiative Computing , 2016 .

[10]  Heiko Paulheim,et al.  Knowledge graph refinement: A survey of approaches and evaluation methods , 2016, Semantic Web.

[11]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Combining human and machine intelligence in large-scale crowdsourcing , 2012, AAMAS.

[12]  Dafna Shahaf,et al.  Analogy Mining for Specific Design Needs , 2017, CHI.

[13]  Gianluca Demartini,et al.  An Introduction to Hybrid Human-Machine Information Systems , 2017, Found. Trends Web Sci..

[14]  Jill Palzkill Woelfer,et al.  A value sensitive action-reflection model: evolving a co-design space with stakeholder and designer prompts , 2013, CHI.

[15]  Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al.  Semantically Far Inspirations Considered Harmful?: Accounting for Cognitive States in Collaborative Ideation , 2017, Creativity & Cognition.

[16]  Pablo N. Mendes,et al.  Improving efficiency and accuracy in multilingual entity extraction , 2013, I-SEMANTICS '13.

[17]  N. Jordan Allocation of functions between man and machines in automated systems. , 1963 .

[18]  John Danaher,et al.  The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation , 2016, Philosophy & Technology.

[19]  Erin Walker,et al.  The Effect of Peripheral Micro-tasks on Crowd Ideation , 2017, CHI.

[20]  Aaron Halfaker,et al.  Value-Sensitive Algorithm Design , 2018, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[21]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces , 1999, CHI '99.

[22]  Bruce W. Arden,et al.  The computer science and engineering research study (COSERS) , 1976, CACM.

[23]  Claudia Müller-Birn,et al.  Enabling Structured Data Generation by Nontechnical Experts , 2017, MuC.

[24]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  The Out-of-the-Loop Performance Problem and Level of Control in Automation , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[25]  Li Chen,et al.  A user-centric evaluation framework for recommender systems , 2011, RecSys '11.

[26]  Charles L. Isbell,et al.  An IP Continuum for Adaptive Interface Design , 1996 .

[27]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[28]  Ivan Lopez-Arevalo,et al.  Information extraction meets the Semantic Web: A survey , 2020, Semantic Web.

[29]  S S Stevens,et al.  HUMAN ENGINEERING FOR AN EFFECTIVE AIR-NAVIGATION AND TRAFFIC-CONTROL SYSTEM, AND APPENDIXES 1 THRU 3 , 1951 .

[30]  Maya Cakmak,et al.  Power to the People: The Role of Humans in Interactive Machine Learning , 2014, AI Mag..

[31]  Emily M. Bender,et al.  Data Statements for Natural Language Processing: Toward Mitigating System Bias and Enabling Better Science , 2018, TACL.

[32]  Bruce W. Arden,et al.  What Can Be Automated?: Computer Science and Engineering Research Study , 1980 .

[33]  Donghee Yoo,et al.  An Ontology-based Co-creation Enhancing System for Idea Recommendation in an Online Community , 2015, DATB.

[34]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Value-sensitive design , 1996, INTR.

[35]  J. C. R. Licklider,et al.  Man-Computer Symbiosis , 1960 .

[36]  Aaron Halfaker,et al.  Bots and Cyborgs: Wikipedia's Immune System , 2012, Computer.

[37]  David B. Kaber,et al.  The Combined Effect of Level of Automation and Adaptive Automation on Human Performance with Complex, Dynamic Control Systems , 1997 .

[38]  Christian Bizer,et al.  DBpedia spotlight: shedding light on the web of documents , 2011, I-Semantics '11.

[39]  Aaron Halfaker,et al.  Operationalizing Conflict and Cooperation between Automated Software Agents in Wikipedia , 2017, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[40]  Douglas C. Engelbart,et al.  Augmenting human intellect: a conceptual framework , 1962 .

[41]  Toby Walsh,et al.  Turing's red flag , 2015, Commun. ACM.

[42]  Tyler H. Shaw,et al.  From ‘automation’ to ‘autonomy’: the importance of trust repair in human–machine interaction , 2018, Ergonomics.

[43]  Francesco Piazza,et al.  Pundit: augmenting web contents with semantics , 2013, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[44]  R. Stuart Geiger,et al.  The work of sustaining order in wikipedia: the banning of a vandal , 2010, CSCW '10.

[45]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[46]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Chatbots, Humbots, and the Quest for Artificial General Intelligence , 2019, CHI.

[47]  Maarten Sierhuis,et al.  Beyond Cooperative Robotics: The Central Role of Interdependence in Coactive Design , 2011, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[48]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Human and Computer Control of Undersea Teleoperators , 1978 .

[49]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Humans: Still Vital After All These Years of Automation , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[50]  Jeffrey M. Bradshaw,et al.  Tomorrow’s Human–Machine Design Tools: From Levels of Automation to Interdependencies , 2018 .

[51]  Yann Mathet,et al.  The Glozz platform: a corpus annotation and mining tool , 2012, DocEng '12.

[52]  Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al.  IdeaHound: Improving Large-scale Collaborative Ideation with Crowd-Powered Real-time Semantic Modeling , 2016, UIST.

[53]  Claudia Müller-Birn,et al.  Innovonto: An Enhanced Crowd Ideation Platform with Semantic Annotation (Hallway Test) , 2018 .

[54]  Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al.  Toward Collaborative Ideation at Scale: Leveraging Ideas from Others to Generate More Creative and Diverse Ideas , 2015, CSCW.

[55]  Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al.  Providing Timely Examples Improves the Quantity and Quality of Generated Ideas , 2015, Creativity & Cognition.

[56]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Direct manipulation vs. interface agents , 1997, INTR.

[57]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Human-computer integration , 2016, Interactions.

[58]  Ahmed Hosny,et al.  The Dataset Nutrition Label: A Framework To Drive Higher Data Quality Standards , 2018, Data Protection and Privacy.

[59]  Inioluwa Deborah Raji,et al.  Model Cards for Model Reporting , 2018, FAT.

[60]  Timnit Gebru,et al.  Datasheets for datasets , 2018, Commun. ACM.

[61]  Ross A. Knepper,et al.  Implicit Communication of Actionable Information in Human-AI teams , 2019, CHI.

[62]  Matti Tedre,et al.  FEATUREWhat should be automated? , 2008, INTR.

[63]  O. Bjelland,et al.  An Inside View of IBM's 'Innovation Jam' , 2008 .

[64]  Charles E. Thorpe,et al.  Collaborative control: a robot-centric model for vehicle teleoperation , 2001 .

[65]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Ways of Knowing in HCI , 2014, Springer New York.

[66]  Alan Borning,et al.  A Survey of Value Sensitive Design Methods , 2018, Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact..