Creating a Three-Parent Child: An Educational Paradigm for the Responsible Conduct of Research

The field of assisted reproduction is renowned for its remarkable advances and constant pushing forward of research boundaries in an effort to offer innovative and effective methods for enhancing fertility. Accompanying these advances, however, are physiological, psychological, and bioethical consequences that must be considered. These concomitant advances and consequences make assisted reproduction an excellent educational paradigm for inculcating responsible conduct in both research and clinical practice. Ultimately, responsible conduct rests on the ethical researcher and clinician. Here, we present the as-yet unapproved, contentious assisted reproductive technology of mitochondrial replacement transfer (MRT) as an ideal educational platform to foster the responsible conduct of research by advancing dialogue among multi-disciplinary scholars, researchers, and students. Using a likely future case, we present the basic science, legal, and ethical considerations, and the pedagogical principles and strategies for using MRT as an effective educational paradigm. Society will benefit when the ethical issues inherent in creating children with three genetic parents as well as germline interference are discussed across multiple academic levels that include researchers, legal experts, bioethicists, and government-appointed commissions. Furthermore, undergraduate and graduate students should be included because they will likely determine the ethical fates of these biotechnologies. While emerging assisted reproduction technologies such as MRT are highly complex and will take years to be readily available for patients in need, now is the time to consider their scientific, legal, ethical, and cultural/religious implications for ensuring the responsible conduct of research.

[1]  C. Grady,et al.  Misunderstanding in clinical research: distinguishing therapeutic misconception, therapeutic misestimation, and therapeutic optimism. , 2003, IRB.

[2]  S. Mitalipov,et al.  Towards germline gene therapy of inherited mitochondrial diseases , 2012, Nature.

[3]  N. G. Puchalt,et al.  OMICS: Current and future perspectives in reproductive medicine and technology , 2014, Journal of human reproductive sciences.

[4]  D. Egli,et al.  Nuclear genome transfer in human oocytes eliminates mitochondrial DNA variants , 2012, Nature.

[5]  B. Gandevia,et al.  DECLARATION OF HELSINKI , 1964, Definitions.

[6]  K. Reinhardt,et al.  Mitochondrial Replacement, Evolution, and the Clinic , 2013, Science.

[7]  J. Brady,et al.  The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. , 2014, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.

[8]  T. H. Allegri The Code of Federal Regulations , 1986 .

[9]  J. Loike,et al.  The New Frontier of Advanced Reproductive Technology: Reevaluating Modern Legal Parenthood , 2013 .

[10]  F. Baylis The ethics of creating children with three genetic parents. , 2013, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[11]  D. Turnbull,et al.  Mitochondrial DNA disease—molecular insights and potential routes to a cure , 2014, Experimental cell research.

[12]  P S Appelbaum,et al.  False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. , 1987, The Hastings Center report.

[13]  S. Eckstein Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2001, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[14]  M. Reni,et al.  Informed consent as an ethical requirement in clinical trials: an old, but still unresolved issue. An observational study to evaluate patient's informed consent comprehension , 2013, Journal of Medical Ethics.