Investigation of Support Interference in High-Angle-of-Attack Testing

An investigation was undertaken to understand support interference in high-angle-of-attack testing with particular emphasis on premature vortex breakdown induced by struts. In static experiments efforts concentrated on the support geometry and its location with respect to leading-edge vortices generated by delta wings. Extensive e ow visualization studies show that vortex breakdown induced by a dummy support might move over the wing depending on theangleofattack andthelocation of thesupport.As thelateral distancebetweenthevortex axisand support is varied, static hysteresis of vortex breakdown location was observed, which will have very important implications on forcemeasurements in wind-tunnel testing. The results also suggest that support interference is more important for slender wings. To separate the effects of time-dependent vortex strength and support interference, the model was kept stationary, and a dummy support was oscillated in the spanwise direction in the oscillatory experiments. It was observed that vortex breakdown location oscillates with large amplitudes at low frequencies, but does not show any response at high frequencies, indicating that the frequency response is similar to that of a low-pass e lter. Variation of phase-averaged breakdown location showed hysteresis loops and time lags, which are largerfor a thin e at platethan a circularcylinder. Theresultssuggestthatsupport interferenceproblems aremore complex in transient experiments.

[1]  Ismet Gursul,et al.  Active control of vortex breakdown over a delta wing , 1995 .

[3]  J. P. Reding,et al.  Review of Support Interference in Dynamic Tests , 1982 .

[4]  N. Wood,et al.  Some observations on the dynamic response to wing motion of the vortex burst phenomenon , 1994, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[5]  Fred E. C. Culick,et al.  The role of non-uniqueness in the development of vortex breakdown in tubes , 1992, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  M. V. Lowson,et al.  Some Experiments with Vortex Breakdown , 1964, The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society.

[7]  Gary E. Erickson,et al.  Water-Tunnel Studies of Leading-Edge Vortices , 1982 .

[8]  I. Gursul,et al.  Active control of vortex breakdown over delta wings , 1994 .

[9]  W. H. Wentz,et al.  Vortex breakdown on slender sharp-edged wings , 1969 .

[10]  M. V. Lowson,et al.  Vortex breakdown control by delta wing geometry , 1994 .

[11]  J. P. Reding,et al.  Dynamic Support Interference in High-Alpha Testing , 1986 .

[12]  D. Darmofal.  A study of the mechanisms of axisymmetric vortex breakdown , 1994 .

[13]  L. Ericsson,et al.  Ground facility interference on aircraft configurations with separated flow , 1993 .

[15]  Juan Lopez,et al.  On the bifurcation structure of axisymmetric vortex breakdown in a constricted pipe , 1994 .

[16]  I. Gursul.  Proposed Mechanism for Time Lag of Vortex Breakdown Location in Unsteady Flows , 2000 .

[17]  L. E. Ericsson,et al.  Another look at high-alpha support interference in rotary tests , 1991 .

[18]  David J. Peake,et al.  Topology of Three-Dimensional Separated Flows , 1982 .

[19]  I. Gursul.  Criteria for location of vortex breakdown over delta wings , 1995, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[20]  M. Visbal,et al.  Computational and physical aspects of vortex breakdown on delta wings , 1995 .

[21]  Ismet Gursul,et al.  Experiments on the unsteady nature of vortex breakdown over delta wings , 1999 .