Differences in wearer response to garments for outdoor activity

The performance of garments for outdoor activity was compared. Three fabrics, each in garments for the upper body, matched garment/wearer dimensions, were worn by 10 athletically ‘well-trained’ males under controlled conditions (hot 32 ± 2°C, 20 ± 2% relative humidity (RH); cold 8 ± 2°C, 40 ± 2% RH) with physical (instrumental) and sensory responses obtained during the trials. Differences in human responses to the fabrics/garments included heart rate, core temperature during run (hot, cold), rest (hot) and walk (cold), heat content of the body, humidity under garments during rest and run and time to onset of sweating. No such differences were identified for change in body mass, core temperature during walk (hot) and rest (cold), skin temperature, temperature of skin covered by the garment, humidity under the garments during walk or for any perceptions (thermal sensations, thermal comfort of torso, exertion, wetness). The garment in single jersey wool fabric performed best in both hot and cold conditions. Effects of garments on wearers are often related to properties of the fabrics from which the garments are made. This study shows that only some differences in fabric properties result in measurable thermophysiological and perceptual responses of the garment wearers and underlines the difficulty in predicting performance of garments/persons from laboratory tests on fabrics.

[1]  Sung Gyoo Park Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise , 1981 .

[2]  J. E. McIntyre,et al.  Textile terms and definitions , 1995 .

[3]  G. Borg Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. , 1982, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[4]  J. Wilson,et al.  Materials and clothing in health and disease , 1975, Medical History.

[5]  B. V. Holcombe,et al.  Moisture Buffering Behavior of Hygroscopic Fabric During Wear , 1992 .

[6]  Y. Li,et al.  Physiological responses and psychological sensations in wearer trials with knitted sportswear. , 1988, Ergonomics.

[7]  I. Mekjavic,et al.  Determination of esophageal probe insertion length based on standing and sitting height. , 1990, Journal of applied physiology.

[8]  J. C. Withers TEXTILE TERMS AND DEFINITIONS , 1952 .

[10]  H. Tokura,et al.  Effects of Moisture Absorption of Clothing on Pitching Speed of Amateur Baseball Players in Hot Environmental Conditions , 2006 .

[11]  Ingvar Holmér,et al.  Heat Exchange and Thermal Insulation Compared in Woolen and Nylon Garments During Wear Trials , 1985 .

[12]  S. Esterby American Society for Testing and Materials , 2006 .

[13]  James D. Hardy,et al.  The technic of measuring radiation and convection , 1938 .

[14]  R. Gong,et al.  Physiological effects of outerwear moisture transfer rate during intermittent bicycle exercise , 2007 .

[15]  Y. Li,et al.  Perceptions of temperature, moisture and comfort in clothing during environmental transients , 2005, Ergonomics.

[16]  A. Gagge,et al.  Direct evaluation of convective heat transfer coefficient by naphthalene sublimation. , 1970, Journal of applied physiology.

[17]  N. Ramanathan,et al.  A NEW WEIGHTING SYSTEM FOR MEAN SURFACE TEMPERATURE OF THE HUMAN BODY. , 1964, Journal of applied physiology.

[18]  A. C. Burton,et al.  Human CalorimetryII. The Average Temperature of the Tissues of the Body: Three Figures , 1935 .

[19]  R Nielsen,et al.  The impact of activity level on sweat accumulation and thermal comfort using different underwear. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[20]  Cherilyn N. Nelson,et al.  Performance of protective clothing : issues and priorities for the 21[st] century : seventh volume , 2000 .

[21]  R. M. Laing,et al.  CLOTHING, TEXTILES, AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE , 2002 .

[22]  Roger L. Barker,et al.  Performance of Protective Clothing , 1986 .

[23]  J D Hardy,et al.  Comfort and thermal sensations and associated physiological responses at various ambient temperatures. , 1967, Environmental research.