Linked Open Vocabulary Ranking and Terms Discovery

Searching among the existing 500 and more vocabularies was never easier than today with the Linked Open Vocabularies (LOV) curated directory list. The LOV search provides one central point to explore the vocabulary terms space. However, it can be still cumbersome for non-experts or semantic annotation experts to discover the appropriate terms for the description of given website content. In this direction, the proposed approach is the cornerstone part of a methodology that aims to facilitate the selection of the highest ranked terms from the abundance of the registered vocabularies based on a keyword search. Moreover, it introduces for the first time the role of the contributors' background, which is retrieved from the LOV repository, in the ranking of the vocabularies. With this addition, we aim to address the issue of very low scores for the newly published vocabularies. The paper underlines the difficulty of selecting vocabulary terms through a survey and describes the approach that enables the ranking of vocabularies within the above mentioned methodology.

[1]  Andreas Harth,et al.  Weaving the Pedantic Web , 2010, LDOW.

[2]  Christian Bizer,et al.  The WebDataCommons Microdata, RDFa and Microformat Dataset Series , 2014, International Semantic Web Conference.

[3]  Ansgar Scherp,et al.  TermPicker: Enabling the Reuse of Vocabulary Terms by Exploiting Data from the Linked Open Data Cloud , 2015, ESWC.

[4]  Ioan Toma,et al.  Towards a formal model for sharing and reusing ranking computations , 2012 .

[5]  Ansgar Scherp,et al.  LOVER: support for modeling data using linked open vocabularies , 2013, EDBT '13.

[6]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Linked data , 2020, Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist.

[7]  María Poveda-Villalón,et al.  Linked Open Vocabularies (LOV): A gateway to reusable semantic vocabularies on the Web , 2016, Semantic Web.

[8]  Armin Haller,et al.  Relationship-Based Top-K Concept Retrieval for Ontology Search , 2014, EKAW.

[9]  Steffen Stadtmüller,et al.  Accessing Information About Linked Data Vocabularies with vocab.cc , 2012, CSWS.

[10]  Anila Sahar Butt Ontology Search: Finding the Right Ontologies on the Web , 2015, WWW.

[11]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Linked Open Vocabulary Recommendation Based on Ranking and Linked Open Data , 2015, JIST.

[12]  Heiko Paulheim,et al.  A Web-scale Study of the Adoption and Evolution of the schema.org Vocabulary over Time , 2015, WIMS.

[13]  Jens Lehmann,et al.  LODStats - An Extensible Framework for High-Performance Dataset Analytics , 2012, EKAW.

[14]  Tom Heath,et al.  Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space , 2011, Linked Data.

[15]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Hotel Websites, Web 2.0, Web 3.0 and Online Direct Marketing: The Case of Austria , 2014, ENTER.

[16]  Ansgar Scherp,et al.  Survey on Common Strategies of Vocabulary Reuse in Linked Open Data Modeling , 2014, ESWC.

[17]  Zohra Bellahsene,et al.  Beyond Established Knowledge Graphs-Recommending Web Datasets for Data Linking , 2016, ICWE.

[18]  Dan Brickley,et al.  Schema.org: Evolution of Structured Data on the Web , 2015, ACM Queue.

[19]  Raphaël Troncy,et al.  Information content based ranking metric for linked open vocabularies , 2014, SEM '14.

[20]  Johanna Völker,et al.  Deployment of RDFa, Microdata, and Microformats on the Web - A Quantitative Analysis , 2013, International Semantic Web Conference.

[21]  Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche,et al.  Linked Open Vocabularies , 2014, ERCIM News.