Issues of threshold selection when determining the fractal dimension in HRCT slices of lumbar vertebrae.

The box counting dimension is a frequently applied tool for the classification of trabecular bone structure. The algorithm requires a binarization of the gray value data, for example that acquired by high resolution CT (HRCT). We recently proposed a method to eliminate bone mineral density (BMD) by applying a linear normalization scheme. Further consideration has shown that full BMD independence has not been achieved, and the structural parameter proposed was therefore difficult to interpret. In this study we present an alternative approach to obtain a structural parameter that is independent of BMD. HRCT volume data was acquired on 21 lumbar vertebrae from five cadavers. In the segmented spongiosa, thresholding was based on different quantiles of the gray value histogram, yielding invariance over linear and non-linear transformations. Thresholding at high gray value levels (80% quantile) shows the highest level of significance when discriminating between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic cases. As an addition to the measurement of BMD alone, the determination of structural properties allows an improvement of the assessment of the individual fracture risk.

[1]  S. Cross,et al.  Trabecular bone does not have a fractal structure on light microscopic examination , 1993, The Journal of pathology.

[2]  R Andresen,et al.  CT determination of bone mineral density and structural investigations on the axial skeleton for estimating the osteoporosis-related fracture risk by means of a risk score. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  R L Webber,et al.  Change in trabecular architecture as measured by fractal dimension. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  M. Giger,et al.  Multifractal radiographic analysis of osteoporosis. , 1994, Medical physics.

[5]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  Cancellous bone structure: analysis of high-resolution CT images with the run-length method. , 1991, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  S S Cross,et al.  FRACTALS IN PATHOLOGY , 1997, The Journal of pathology.

[7]  Claus Christiansen,et al.  Diagnosis of Osteoporosis , 1992, Southern medical journal.

[8]  N L Fazzalari,et al.  Fractal properties of cancellous bone of the iliac crest in vertebral crush fracture. , 1998, Bone.

[9]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Fractal geometry and vertebral compression fractures , 1994, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research.

[10]  Rachid Harba,et al.  DETERMINATION OF FRACTAL SCALES ON TRABECULAR BONE X-RAY IMAGES , 1994 .

[11]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Morphometric texture analysis of spinal trabecular bone structure assessed using orthogonal radiographic projections. , 1998, Medical physics.

[12]  Sebastiano B. Serpico,et al.  Fractal-Based Image Analysis In Radiological Applications , 1987, Other Conferences.

[13]  R Andresen,et al.  Assessing the degree of osteoporosis in the axial skeleton using the dependence of the fractal dimension on the grey level threshold. , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[14]  M. Underweiser,et al.  On the fractal nature of trabecular structure. , 1994, Medical physics.

[15]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Application of fractal geometry techniques to the study of trabecular bone. , 1993, Medical physics.