Accuracy assessment of CKC high-density surface EMG decomposition in biceps femoris muscle

The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of the convolution kernel compensation (CKC) method in decomposing high-density surface EMG (HDsEMG) signals from the pennate biceps femoris long-head muscle. Although the CKC method has already been thoroughly assessed in parallel-fibered muscles, there are several factors that could hinder its performance in pennate muscles. Namely, HDsEMG signals from pennate and parallel-fibered muscles differ considerably in terms of the number of detectable motor units (MUs) and the spatial distribution of the motor-unit action potentials (MUAPs). In this study, monopolar surface EMG signals were recorded from five normal subjects during low-force voluntary isometric contractions using a 92-channel electrode grid with 8 mm inter-electrode distances. Intramuscular EMG (iEMG) signals were recorded concurrently using monopolar needles. The HDsEMG and iEMG signals were independently decomposed into MUAP trains, and the iEMG results were verified using a rigorous a posteriori statistical analysis. HDsEMG decomposition identified from 2 to 30 MUAP trains per contraction. 3 ± 2 of these trains were also reliably detected by iEMG decomposition. The measured CKC decomposition accuracy of these common trains over a selected 10 s interval was 91.5 ± 5.8%. The other trains were not assessed. The significant factors that affected CKC decomposition accuracy were the number of HDsEMG channels that were free of technical artifact and the distinguishability of the MUAPs in the HDsEMG signal (P < 0.05). These results show that the CKC method reliably identifies at least a subset of MUAP trains in HDsEMG signals from low force contractions in pennate muscles.

[1]  Joshua C. Kline,et al.  Decomposition of surface EMG signals. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Øyvind Langsrud,et al.  ANOVA for unbalanced data: Use Type II instead of Type III sums of squares , 2003, Stat. Comput..

[3]  A. Fuglevand,et al.  Common Input across Motor Nuclei Mediating Precision Grip in Humans , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  J. Halbertsma,et al.  Repeated passive stretching: acute effect on the passive muscle moment and extensibility of short hamstrings. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  T. Best,et al.  MR imaging of the distribution and location of acute hamstring injuries in athletes. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  H. Hermens,et al.  European recommendations for surface electromyography: Results of the SENIAM Project , 1999 .

[7]  C. Moritz,et al.  Discharge rate variability influences the variation in force fluctuations across the working range of a hand muscle. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Elizabeth A. Peck,et al.  Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis , 2001 .

[9]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, Solutions Manual (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics) , 2007 .

[10]  K C McGill,et al.  Rigorous a Posteriori Assessment of Accuracy in EMG Decomposition , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[11]  D. Connell,et al.  Hamstring muscle complex: an imaging review. , 2005, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[12]  Dario Farina,et al.  A new method for the extraction and classification of single motor unit action potentials from surface EMG signals , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  H. Pollard,et al.  The management of hamstring injury--Part 1: Issues in diagnosis. , 2005, Manual therapy.

[14]  Bert U Kleine,et al.  Using two-dimensional spatial information in decomposition of surface EMG signals. , 2007, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[15]  D. Brooks MUSCLES: TESTING AND FUNCTION. By Henry O. Kendall and Florence P. Kendall, Physical Therapy Department, Children's Hospital School, Baltimore, Maryland. ll½x9 in. Pp. xi+278, with 162 figures. Appendix and Index. 1949. Baltimore: The Williams Wilkins Company. Price $7.50 , 1950 .

[16]  D. Zazula,et al.  Correlation-based decomposition of surface electromyograms at low contraction forces , 2004, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[17]  H. Kumakura Functional analysis of the biceps femoris muscle during locomotor behavior in some primates. , 1989, American journal of physical anthropology.

[18]  F. P. Kendall,et al.  Muscles, testing and function , 1971 .

[19]  J. Neter,et al.  Applied Linear Regression Models , 1983 .

[20]  Kevin C. McGill,et al.  Automatic decomposition of the electromyogram , 1983 .

[21]  D F Stegeman,et al.  Magnetic stimulation‐induced modulations of motor unit firings extracted from multi‐channel surface EMG , 2000, Muscle & nerve.

[22]  E. Simonsen,et al.  A mechanism for increased contractile strength of human pennate muscle in response to strength training: changes in muscle architecture , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  Roberto Merletti,et al.  Insights gained into the interpretation of surface electromyograms from the gastrocnemius muscles: A simulation study. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  J. Slavotinek,et al.  Hamstring injury in athletes: using MR imaging measurements to compare extent of muscle injury with amount of time lost from competition. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[25]  B. Freriks,et al.  Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. , 2000, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[26]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[27]  S. Delp,et al.  Hamstrings and psoas lengths during normal and crouch gait: Implications for muscle‐tendon surgery , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[28]  R. LaPrade,et al.  The Biceps Femoris Muscle Complex at the Knee , 1996, The American journal of sports medicine.

[29]  Bert U Kleine,et al.  Inter-operator agreement in decomposition of motor unit firings from high-density surface EMG. , 2008, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[30]  Gea Drost,et al.  Clinical applications of high-density surface EMG: a systematic review. , 2006, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[31]  T Sadoyama,et al.  Skeletal muscles from which the propagation of motor unit action potentials is detectable with a surface electrode array. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[32]  W. Garrett Muscle Strain Injuries , 1996, The American journal of sports medicine.

[33]  D. Farina,et al.  Experimental Analysis of Accuracy in the Identification of Motor Unit Spike Trains From High-Density Surface EMG , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[34]  J. Hogrel,et al.  Use of surface EMG for studying motor unit recruitment during isometric linear force ramp. , 2003, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[35]  D. Connell,et al.  Imaging of hamstring injuries: therapeutic implications , 2006, European Radiology.

[36]  Roberto Merletti,et al.  The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[37]  D. Farina,et al.  Analysis of motor units with high-density surface electromyography. , 2008, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[38]  W. Garrett,et al.  Computed tomography of hamstring muscle strains. , 1989, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[39]  Damjan Zazula,et al.  Multichannel Blind Source Separation Using Convolution Kernel Compensation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[40]  M. Hulse,et al.  The Football Association Medical Research Programme: an audit of injuries in professional football—analysis of hamstring injuries , 2004, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[41]  E. Adrian,et al.  The discharge of impulses in motor nerve fibres , 1929, The Journal of physiology.

[42]  E. Adrian,et al.  The discharge of impulses in motor nerve fibres , 1928, The Journal of physiology.

[43]  C. Disselhorst-Klug,et al.  Principles of high-spatial-resolution surface EMG (HSR-EMG): single motor unit detection and application in the diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders. , 1997, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[44]  Damjan Zazula,et al.  An approach to surface EMG decomposition based on higher-order cumulants , 2005, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[45]  G. Melchiorri,et al.  A method for positioning electrodes during surface EMG recordings in lower limb muscles , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[46]  D. Farina,et al.  Estimating motor unit discharge patterns from high-density surface electromyogram , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[47]  W. Rymer,et al.  Can standard surface EMG processing parameters be used to estimate motor unit global firing rate? , 2004, Journal of neural engineering.

[48]  Kevin C. McGill,et al.  EMGLAB: An interactive EMG decomposition program , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[49]  Roberto Merletti,et al.  Electromyography. Physiology, engineering and non invasive applications , 2005 .