Pathogen removal in farm-scale psychrophilic anaerobic digesters processing swine manure.

This study assessed the efficiency of commercial-scale psychrophilic anaerobic digestion in sequencing batch reactors (PADSBRs) for pathogen removal from pig manure. The impact of treatment cycle length and of hydraulic flow regimes on pathogen removal efficiency was investigated. Two conventionally operated SBRs (BR1 and BR2) and two SBRs simultaneously fed during the draw step (BR3 and BR4) were monitored over a two-year period. PADSBRs significantly decreased the concentration of coliforms, Salmonella, Campylobacter spp., and Y. enterocolitica, respectively from about 10(6), 10(3) CFU g(-1), 10(3), and 10(4) CFU g(-1) to undetectable levels in most samples. Densities of the gram-positive Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus spp. remained high (10(5) CFU g(-1)) in the digesters throughout treatment. The PADSBRs maintained the same level of pathogen removal when the treatment cycle length was reduced from 2 to 1 week. Mass balances on volatile fatty acids (VFAs) revealed short-circuits of inlet flow respectively averaging 6.3% and 6.4% for BR3 and BR4, significantly reducing the overall performance of these reactors regarding pathogens removal. The results obtained in this study show the ability of low temperature anaerobic digestion to remove or significantly reduce indicator and pathogen concentration from raw pig manure.

[1]  G. Berg,et al.  Destruction by Anaerobic Mesophilic and Thermophilic Digestion of Viruses and Indicator Bacteria Indigenous to Domestic Sludges , 1980, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[2]  S. Goyal,et al.  Pathogens and manure management systems: A review , 2003, Environmental technology.

[3]  Jerry L. Hatfield,et al.  Animal Waste Utilization: Effective Use of Manure as a Soil Resource , 1997 .

[4]  S. Smith,et al.  Factors controlling pathogen destruction during anaerobic digestion of biowastes. , 2005, Waste management.

[5]  John Elmerdahl Olsen,et al.  Bacterial decimation times in anaerobic digestions of animal slurries , 1987 .

[6]  J. P. Frost,et al.  Survival of pathogenic bacteria during mesophilic anaerobic digestion of animal waste. , 1993, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[7]  G. Diekert,et al.  Metabolism of homoacetogens , 2004, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[8]  M. Sobsey,et al.  Microbial indicator reductions in alternative treatment systems for swine wastewater , 1998 .

[9]  T. Y. Guan,et al.  Pathogen survival in swine manure environments and transmission of human enteric illness--a review. , 2003, Journal of environmental quality.

[10]  P. Levett,et al.  The effect of slurry storage and anaerobic digestion on survival of pathogenic bacteria. , 1993, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[11]  M. Lebuhn,et al.  Mesophilic-thermophilic-mesophilic anaerobic digestion of liquid dairy cattle manure. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[12]  V. O’Flaherty,et al.  The Microbiology and Biochemistry of Anaerobic Bioreactors with Relevance to Domestic Sewage Treatment , 2006 .

[13]  D. Massé,et al.  Potential of low-temperature anaerobic digestion to address current environmental concerns on swine production. , 2010, Journal of animal science.

[14]  S. Weagant.  Medium for presumptive identification of Yersinia enterocolitica , 1983, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[15]  R. Gadre,et al.  A note on survival of salmonellas during anaerobic digestion of cattle dung. , 1986, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[16]  J. Line,et al.  Development of a selective differential agar for isolation and enumeration of Campylobacter spp. , 2001, Journal of food protection.

[17]  A. Pell.  Manure and Microbes: Public and Animal Health Problem? , 1997, Journal of Dairy Science.

[18]  J. E. Olsen.  Studies on the reduction of pathogenic and indicator bacteria in liquid pig manure treated by sedimentation and anaerobic filter digestion for methane generation , 1988 .

[19]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[20]  S. Sattar,et al.  Fate of Cryptosporidium oocysts, Giardia cysts, and microbial indicators during wastewater treatment and anaerobic sludge digestion. , 1999, Canadian journal of microbiology.

[21]  M. Hutchison,et al.  Analyses of Livestock Production, Waste Storage, and Pathogen Levels and Prevalences in Farm Manures , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[22]  D. Massé,et al.  Reduction of indicator and pathogenic microorganisms by psychrophilic anaerobic digestion in swine slurries. , 2006, Bioresource technology.

[23]  G. Klein.  Taxonomy, ecology and antibiotic resistance of enterococci from food and the gastro-intestinal tract. , 2003, International journal of food microbiology.

[24]  Craig S. Tucker,et al.  Appendix 2: Selected Excerpts from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries , 2008 .

[25]  J. Guan,et al.  Public health implications related to spread of pathogens in manure from livestock and poultry operations. , 2004, Methods in molecular biology.

[26]  M. Wenneker,et al.  Survival of human and plant pathogens during anaerobic mesophilic digestion of vegetable, fruit, and garden waste , 2003 .

[27]  Leena Sahlström,et al.  A review of survival of pathogenic bacteria in organic waste used in biogas plants. , 2003, Bioresource technology.

[28]  S. S. Kanwar,et al.  Fate of bacterial pathogens in cattle dung slurry subjected to anaerobic digestion , 1999 .

[29]  V. Arthurson.  Proper Sanitization of Sewage Sludge: a Critical Issue for a Sustainable Society , 2008, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[30]  T. C. Daniel,et al.  Impacts of animal manure management on ground and surface water quality. , 1998 .

[31]  Carol Phillips,et al.  The ecology, epidemiology and virulence of Enterococcus. , 2009, Microbiology.

[32]  J. Spencer,et al.  Public health microbiology: methods and protocols. , 2004 .