Flexible formulation of value for experiment interpretation and design
暂无分享,去创建一个
Matthew R. Carbone | Phillip M. Maffettone | H. Joress | Bruce Ravel | Chandima Fernando | Shinjae Yoo | Hyeong Jin Kim | Daniel Olds | Brian DeCost | Yugang Zhang
[1] Brian L. DeCost,et al. Self-driving Multimodal Studies at User Facilities , 2023, Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances.
[2] Phillip M. Maffettone,et al. Delivering real-time multi-modal materials analysis with enterprise beamlines , 2022, Cell Reports Physical Science.
[3] Anthony Degennaro,et al. Machine Learning for analysis of speckle dynamics: quantification and outlier detection , 2022, Physical Review Research.
[4] Phillip M. Maffettone,et al. Advancing Discovery with Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning at NSLS-II , 2022, Synchrotron Radiation News.
[5] A. Kusne,et al. Scalable multi-agent lab framework for lab optimization , 2022, Matter.
[6] Brian L. DeCost,et al. Reproducible sorbent materials foundry for carbon capture at scale , 2022, Cell Reports Physical Science.
[7] Paul Bendich,et al. Topological Simplification of Signals for Inference and Approximate Reconstruction , 2022, 2023 IEEE Aerospace Conference.
[8] Bruce Ravel,et al. Machine learning enabling high-throughput and remote operations at large-scale user facilities , 2022, Digital Discovery.
[9] A. Henson,et al. Discovering New Chemistry with an Autonomous Robotic Platform Driven by a Reactivity-Seeking Neural Network , 2021, ACS central science.
[10] I. Takeuchi,et al. On-the-fly autonomous control of neutron diffraction via physics-informed Bayesian active learning , 2021, Applied Physics Reviews.
[11] Aaron Stein,et al. Gaussian processes for autonomous data acquisition at large-scale synchrotron and neutron facilities , 2021, Nature Reviews Physics.
[12] Semion K. Saikin,et al. Autonomous experimentation systems for materials development: A community perspective , 2021 .
[13] Aidan C. Daly,et al. Constrained non-negative matrix factorization enabling real-time insights of in situ and high-throughput experiments , 2021, Applied Physics Reviews.
[14] Phillip M. Maffettone,et al. Gaming the beamlines—employing reinforcement learning to maximize scientific outcomes at large-scale user facilities , 2021, Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol..
[15] A. Butté,et al. Machine Learning for Biologics: Opportunities for Protein Engineering, Developability, and Formulation , 2021, Trends in Pharmacological Sciences.
[16] P. Midgley,et al. Revisiting metal fluorides as lithium-ion battery cathodes , 2021, Nature Materials.
[17] Daniel Olds,et al. Outlook for artificial intelligence and machine learning at the NSLS-II , 2020, Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol..
[18] D. Olds. Synchrotron X-ray Diffraction for Energy and Environmental Materials: The Current Role and Future Directions of Total Scattering Beamlines in the Functional Material Scientific Ecosystem , 2020, Synchrotron Radiation News.
[19] Phillip M. Maffettone,et al. Crystallography companion agent for high-throughput materials discovery , 2020, Nature Computational Science.
[20] Shinsuke Ishihara,et al. Pushing property limits in materials discovery via boundless objective-free exploration† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: The details of BLOX and experimental spectroscopic data. See DOI: 10.1039/d0sc00982b , 2020, Chemical science.
[21] Jiagen Li,et al. Autonomous discovery of optically active chiral inorganic perovskite nanocrystals through an intelligent cloud lab , 2020, Nature Communications.
[22] Jonathan Grizou,et al. A curious formulation robot enables the discovery of a novel protocell behavior , 2020, Science Advances.
[23] David T. Jones,et al. Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning , 2020, Nature.
[24] Brian L. DeCost,et al. A high-throughput structural and electrochemical study of metallic glass formation in Ni-Ti-Al. , 2019, ACS combinatorial science.
[25] Sorelle A. Friedler,et al. Experiment Specification, Capture and Laboratory Automation Technology (ESCALATE): a software pipeline for automated chemical experimentation and data management , 2019, MRS Communications.
[26] Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al. Next-Generation Experimentation with Self-Driving Laboratories , 2019, Trends in Chemistry.
[27] Alexei A. Efros,et al. Large-Scale Study of Curiosity-Driven Learning , 2018, ICLR.
[28] Peter I. Frazier,et al. A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimization , 2018, ArXiv.
[29] Leroy Cronin,et al. Designing Algorithms To Aid Discovery by Chemical Robots , 2018, ACS central science.
[30] Carl T. Bergstrom,et al. Science of Science , 2018, Nature.
[31] Sergey Levine,et al. Diversity is All You Need: Learning Skills without a Reward Function , 2018, ICLR.
[32] P. F. Peterson,et al. Combinatorial appraisal of transition states for in situ pair distribution function analysis , 2017 .
[33] Jacob G Foster,et al. Choosing experiments to accelerate collective discovery , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[34] H. Hirsh,et al. Amplify scientific discovery with artificial intelligence , 2014, Science.
[35] Ryan P. Adams,et al. Multi-Task Bayesian Optimization , 2013, NIPS.
[36] Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al. Active learning of inverse models with intrinsically motivated goal exploration in robots , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..
[37] Kenneth O. Stanley,et al. Abandoning Objectives: Evolution Through the Search for Novelty Alone , 2011, Evolutionary Computation.
[38] Appendix to: BOTORCH: A Framework for Efficient Monte-Carlo Bayesian Optimization , 2021 .
[39] Nando de Freitas,et al. Taking the Human Out of the Loop: A Review of Bayesian Optimization , 2016, Proceedings of the IEEE.
[40] Sidney Addelman,et al. trans-Dimethanolbis(1,1,1-trifluoro-5,5-dimethylhexane-2,4-dionato)zinc(II) , 2008, Acta crystallographica. Section E, Structure reports online.