Water sorption of light-cured resin cement: The effect of Ceramic material and thickness.

Aim: The objective of the current study is to evaluate the water sorption of resin cement under three types of ceramic material (Lithium di-silicate, Vita Enamic & Cerasmart) Using two thicknesses (0.4 & 1mm). Methodology: Forty-two specimens will be sliced with two thicknesses (0.4 & 1mm) from Lithium di-silicate (e-max), Resin reinforced lithium di-silicate (vita Enamic), and Cerasmart blocks. Then water sorption of resin cement will be evaluated after curing through each specimen using a digital weight caliper. Results: Results showed a significant difference in water sorption between different materials, the lowest water sorption of resin cement was found under lithium disilicate (e.max) than that of Vita Enamic and Cerasmart samples. There wasn’t a significant difference between different thicknesses of Vita Enamic and Cerasmart blocks, However, in Emax samples, 1.0 mm thick samples had significantly higher water sorption values than samples with 0.4 mm thickness. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study it may be concluded that Lithium disilicate ceramic restorations allow more conversion of monomer to polymer in the underlying cement than polymer reinforced ceramic which allows a higher degree of conversion than resin Nanoceramics with the same thickness. Also, Hybrid ceramics with different thicknesses up to 1.0 mm have no significant effect on the water sorption of resin cement.

[1]  O. Polydorou Elution of Substances from Dental Composite Materials , 2018 .

[2]  A. Mesbah,et al.  Assessment of color stability of different resin cements having different modes of polymerization before and after aging , 2016 .

[3]  J. Matinlinna,et al.  Effect of light transmission on hybrid ceramic-resin-ti adhesion system , 2016 .

[4]  Á. Della Bona,et al.  Optical properties of CAD-CAM ceramic systems. , 2014, Journal of dentistry.

[5]  C. Gonzaga,et al.  Degree of conversion of a resin cement light-cured through ceramic veneers of different thicknesses and types. , 2014, Brazilian dental journal.

[6]  Kenneth J. Anusavice,et al.  Phillips' science of dental materials , 2013 .

[7]  Joo-Hee Lee,et al.  Curing efficiency of various resin-based materials polymerized through different ceramic thicknesses and curing time , 2011, The journal of advanced prosthodontics.

[8]  G. Christensen Why use resin cements? , 2010, Journal.

[9]  R. Hickel,et al.  Correlation between ceramics translucency and polymerization efficiency through ceramics. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[10]  L. Correr-Sobrinho,et al.  Effect of light-curing method and cement activation mode on resin cement knoop hardness. , 2007, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[11]  K. Allen,et al.  A 100-year journey from GV Black to minimal surgical intervention. , 2007, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[12]  H. Gerth,et al.  Chemical analysis and bonding reaction of RelyX Unicem and Bifix composites--a comparative study. , 2006, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[13]  C. Soares,et al.  Influence of the feldspathic ceramic thickness and shade on the microhardness of dual resin cement. , 2006, Operative dentistry.

[14]  N. Barghi,et al.  LED and halogen lights: effect of ceramic thickness and shade on curing luting resin. , 2003, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[15]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Three-year clinical effectiveness of four total-etch dentinal adhesive systems in cervical lesions. , 1996, Quintessence international.

[16]  R. Bagnall,et al.  The science of dental materials , 1987, British Dental Journal.