A D2D-Based Protocol for Ultra-Reliable Wireless Communications for Industrial Automation

As an indispensable use case for the 5G wireless systems on the roadmap, ultra-reliable and low-latency communications (URLLC) is a crucial requirement for the coming era of wireless industrial automation. The key performance indicators for URLLC stand in sharp contrast to the requirements of enhanced mobile broadband: low-latency and ultra-reliability are paramount but high data rates are often not required. This paper aims to develop communication techniques for making a paradigm shift from the conventional human-type broadband communications to the emerging machine-type URLLC. One fundamental task for URLLC is to deliver short commands from a controller to a group of actuators within the stringent delay requirement and with high reliability. Motivated by the factory automation setting in which the tasks are assigned to groups of devices that work in close proximity to each other and can thus form clusters of reliable device-to-device (D2D) networks, this paper proposes a novel two-phase transmission protocol for achieving URLLC. In the first phase, within the latency requirement, the multi-antenna base station (BS) combines the messages of all devices within each group together and multicasts them to the corresponding groups; messages for different groups are spatially multiplexed. In the second phase, the devices that have decoded the messages successfully, herein defined as the leaders, help relay the messages to the other devices in their groups. Under this protocol, we design an innovative leader selection-based beamforming strategy at the BS by utilizing the sparse optimization technique. The proposed strategy leads to a desired sparsity pattern in user activity with at least one leader being able to decode its message in each group in the first phase, thus ensuring full utilization of the reliability enhancing D2D transmissions in the second phase. Simulation results are provided to show that the proposed two-phase transmission protocol considerably improves the reliability of the entire system within the stringent latency requirement as compared with existing schemes for URLLC.

[1]  Henrik Klessig,et al.  Requirements and current solutions of wireless communication in industrial automation , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC).

[2]  Wei Yu,et al.  Massive Connectivity With Massive MIMO—Part I: Device Activity Detection and Channel Estimation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  Gordon P. Wright,et al.  Technical Note - A General Inner Approximation Algorithm for Nonconvex Mathematical Programs , 1978, Oper. Res..

[4]  Zexian Li,et al.  Link adaptation design for ultra-reliable communications , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[5]  Anitha Varghese,et al.  Wireless requirements and challenges in Industry 4.0 , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I).

[6]  Emil Björnson,et al.  A Random Access Protocol for Pilot Allocation in Crowded Massive MIMO Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[7]  Anant Sahai,et al.  Real-Time Cooperative Communication for Automation Over Wireless , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[8]  Ke Wang Helmersson,et al.  Deployment Strategies for Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communication in Factory Automation , 2015, 2015 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[9]  Wei Yu,et al.  Massive Connectivity With Massive MIMO—Part II: Achievable Rate Characterization , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[10]  Markku J. Juntti,et al.  A Conic Quadratic Programming Approach to Physical Layer Multicasting for Large-Scale Antenna Arrays , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[11]  Quan Wang,et al.  Comparative Examination on Architecture and Protocol of Industrial Wireless Sensor Network Standards , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[12]  Kyungwhoon Cheun,et al.  Millimeter-wave beamforming as an enabling technology for 5G cellular communications: theoretical feasibility and prototype results , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[13]  Thomas L. Marzetta,et al.  Noncooperative Cellular Wireless with Unlimited Numbers of Base Station Antennas , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[14]  Nei Kato,et al.  Device-to-Device Communication in LTE-Advanced Networks: A Survey , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[15]  Erik G. Larsson,et al.  Massive MIMO for next generation wireless systems , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[16]  Lars Michael Kristensen,et al.  An Industrial Perspective on Wireless Sensor Networks — A Survey of Requirements, Protocols, and Challenges , 2014, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[17]  Wei Yu,et al.  Cloud radio access network: Virtualizing wireless access for dense heterogeneous systems , 2015, Journal of Communications and Networks.

[18]  Y.-P. Eric Wang,et al.  Radio access for ultra-reliable and low-latency 5G communications , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communication Workshop (ICCW).

[19]  Ami Wiesel,et al.  Linear precoding via conic optimization for fixed MIMO receivers , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[20]  Giuseppe Durisi,et al.  Quasi-Static Multiple-Antenna Fading Channels at Finite Blocklength , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[21]  Yixin Chen,et al.  Real-Time Wireless Sensor-Actuator Networks for Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems , 2016, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[22]  Ya-Feng Liu,et al.  An Efficient Global Algorithm for Single-Group Multicast Beamforming , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[23]  Gerard J. Foschini,et al.  A simple distributed autonomous power control algorithm and its convergence , 1993 .

[24]  Petar Popovski,et al.  Towards Massive, Ultra-Reliable, and Low-Latency Wireless Communication with Short Packets , 2015 .

[25]  Nikos D. Sidiropoulos,et al.  Quality of Service and Max-Min Fair Transmit Beamforming to Multiple Cochannel Multicast Groups , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[26]  Riku Jäntti,et al.  Analysis of transmission methods for ultra-reliable communications , 2015, 2015 IEEE 26th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[27]  Y.-P. Eric Wang,et al.  Analysis of ultra-reliable and low-latency 5G communication for a factory automation use case , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communication Workshop (ICCW).

[28]  Nikos D. Sidiropoulos,et al.  Transmit beamforming for physical-layer multicasting , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[29]  Petar Popovski,et al.  Ultra-reliable communication in 5G wireless systems , 2014, 1st International Conference on 5G for Ubiquitous Connectivity.

[30]  Anant Sahai,et al.  Cooperative communication for high-reliability low-latency wireless control , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[31]  Gerhard Fettweis,et al.  Achieving high availability in wireless networks by an optimal number of Rayleigh-fading links , 2014, 2014 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[32]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Channel Coding Rate in the Finite Blocklength Regime , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[33]  Ioannis Mitliagkas,et al.  Joint Power and Admission Control for Ad-Hoc and Cognitive Underlay Networks: Convex Approximation and Distributed Implementation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.