Pupil size directly modulates the feedforward response in human primary visual cortex independently of attention

Controversy revolves around the question of whether psychological factors like attention and emotion can influence the initial feedforward response in primary visual cortex (V1). Although traditionally, the electrophysiological correlate of this response in humans (the C1 component) has been found to be unaltered by psychological influences, a number of recent studies have described attentional and emotional modulations. Yet, research into psychological effects on the feedforward V1 response has neglected possible direct contributions of concomitant pupil-size modulations, which are known to also occur under various conditions of attentional load and emotional state. Here we tested the hypothesis that such pupil-size differences themselves directly affect the feedforward V1 response. We report data from two complementary experiments, in which we used procedures that modulate pupil size without differences in attentional load or emotion while simultaneously recording pupil-size and EEG data. Our results confirm that pupil size indeed directly influences the feedforward V1 response, showing an inverse relationship between pupil size and early V1 activity. While it is unclear in how far this effect represents a functionally-relevant adaptation, it identifies pupil-size differences as an important modulating factor of the feedforward response of V1 and could hence represent a confounding variable in research investigating the neural influence of psychological factors on early visual processing.

[1]  Paola Binda,et al.  Attention to Bright Surfaces Enhances the Pupillary Light Reflex , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  W Skrandies,et al.  Human contrast sensitivity: regional retinal differences. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[3]  D. G. Green,et al.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  G. Pourtois,et al.  Feeling happy enhances early spatial encoding of peripheral information automatically: electrophysiological time-course and neural sources , 2014, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[5]  C. Spence The Psychology of Attention by Harold E. Pashler , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  G. Pourtois,et al.  Attentional load modifies early activity in human primary visual cortex , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[7]  G. Pourtois,et al.  Top-down effects on early visual processing in humans: A predictive coding framework , 2011, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[8]  Gilles Pourtois,et al.  State-dependent attention modulation of human primary visual cortex: A high density ERP study , 2012, NeuroImage.

[9]  Zhe Qu,et al.  Earliest stages of visual cortical processing are not modified by attentional load , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[10]  Antigona Martínez,et al.  Source analysis of event-related cortical activity during visuo-spatial attention. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  C. Dissanayake,et al.  Pupillometry reveals reduced unconscious emotional reactivity in autism , 2014, Biological Psychology.

[12]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Response profiles to texture border patterns in area V1 , 2000, Visual Neuroscience.

[13]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  Sebastiaan Mathôt,et al.  New Light on the Mind’s Eye , 2015, Current directions in psychological science.

[15]  D. Jeffreys,et al.  Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. I. Component of striate cortical origin , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  J. Grainger,et al.  The Pupillary Light Response Reveals the Focus of Covert Visual Attention , 2013, PloS one.

[18]  B. Laeng,et al.  Bright illusions reduce the eye's pupil , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Spatial Selective Attention Affects Early Extrastriate But Not Striate Components of the Visual Evoked Potential , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  U. Polat,et al.  ADHD subjects fail to suppress eye blinks and microsaccades while anticipating visual stimuli but recover with medication , 2014, Vision Research.

[21]  C. N. Boehler,et al.  Rapid recurrent processing gates awareness in primary visual cortex , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  P. Vuilleumier,et al.  How brains beware: neural mechanisms of emotional attention , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  G. Pourtois,et al.  Effects of perceptual learning on primary visual cortex activity in humans , 2008, Vision Research.

[24]  Gilles Pourtois,et al.  Negative affective state mimics effects of perceptual load on spatial perception. , 2013, Emotion.

[25]  A. Anderson,et al.  Optical Origins of Opposing Facial Expression Actions , 2014, Psychological science.

[26]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Delayed Striate Cortical Activation during Spatial Attention , 2002, Neuron.

[27]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Spatial attention modulates initial afferent activity in human primary visual cortex. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Guarding the gateway to cortex: attention in visual thalamus , 2008, Nature.

[29]  Gilles Pourtois,et al.  Effects of attentional load on early visual processing depend on stimulus timing , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[30]  T. White,et al.  Regulation of cognitive resources during an n-back task in youth-onset psychosis and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). , 2009, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[31]  Gilles Pourtois,et al.  Positive emotion broadens attention focus through decreased position-specific spatial encoding in early visual cortex: Evidence from ERPs , 2013, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[32]  D. Grandjean,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of rapid spatial orienting towards fearful faces. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.