Engineering in accidents: vehicle design and injuries.

This review has touched superficially on the various mechanisms of injuries to the main classes of road-user casualties, and illustrated some of the desirable vehicle design characteristics which can minimize road trauma. There is still much to be gained by better vehicle design. For occupants, enhanced performance from restraint systems, supplementary airbags, better structural integrity and better compatibility between cars and lorries are obvious areas where known solutions are waiting to be applied. For pedestrians there is an extensive literature outlining the characteristics of friendly vehicle exteriors; many current models of cars are exhibiting some of these properties but better agreement on an optimum specification for the car's exterior is still required. For motorcyclists there is the promise of improved leg protection from energy-absorbing fairings although substantial technical debate still surrounds these proposals. For the clinician, a more accurate appreciation of the likely injuries which occur in given collision circumstances can help in diagnosis and treatment. It is for these reasons that some understanding of vehicle design and crash-worthiness is worthwhile.

[1]  D C Herbert,et al.  OCCUPANT HEAD SPACE IN PASSENGER CARS , 1976 .

[2]  Gerry Leisman,et al.  Biomechanics of head injury. , 1990, The International journal of neuroscience.

[3]  L. M. M. Careme,et al.  Biomechanics of Head Injury in Frontal Impacts , 1990 .

[4]  S. J. Ashton,et al.  Pedestrian Injuries and the Car Exterior , 1977 .

[5]  H. Cairns Head Injuries in Motor-cyclists. The Importance of the Crash Helmet , 1941, British medical journal.

[6]  D. Viano Biomechanics of Head Injury — Toward a Theory Linking Head Dynamic Motion, Brain Tissue Deformation and Neural Trauma , 1988 .

[7]  J H Mathewson,et al.  AUTOMOBILE-BARRIER IMPACTS , 1954 .

[8]  Mcleanaj CAR SHAPE AND PEDESTRIAN INJURY , 1972 .

[9]  B J Campbell,et al.  REDUCING TRAFFIC INJURY - A GLOBAL CHALLENGE , 1988 .

[10]  H Appel,et al.  Risk-order of injury-causing car parts in various types of car accidents , 1986 .

[11]  D. Viano,et al.  Thoracic Impact: A Viscous Tolerance Criterion , 1985 .

[12]  Richard G. Snyder Study of impact tolerance through free-fall investigations. Final report , 1977 .

[13]  Donald F. Huelke,et al.  Patterns of injury in fatal automobile accidents , 1962 .

[14]  G. Faverjon,et al.  Protection against rear-end accidents , 1982 .

[15]  J. Adams,et al.  Diffuse axonal injury and traumatic coma in the primate , 1982, Annals of neurology.

[16]  Hugh DeHaven,et al.  Mechanical analysis of survival in falls from heights of fifty to one hundred and fifty feet (reprint 1942) , 1942 .

[17]  J. Sheldon On the Natural History of Falls in Old Age* , 1960, British medical journal.

[18]  Lothar Grosch Injury Criteria for Combined Restraint Systems , 1985 .

[19]  Michael B. James,et al.  Injury and Intrusion in Side Impacts and Rollovers , 1984 .

[20]  Stephen W. Rouhana,et al.  Assessment of Lap-ShouIder Belt Restraint Performance in Laboratory Testing , 1989 .

[21]  W GISSANE,et al.  Injuries from road accidents. , 1962, The Practitioner.