Soft tissue reactions evoked by implanted gallium phosphide.

Neural devices may play an important role in the diagnosis and therapy of several clinical conditions, such as stroke, trauma or neurodegenerative disorders, by facilitating motor and pain control. Such interfaces, chronically implanted in the CNS, need to be biocompatible and have the ability to stimulate and record nerve signals. However, neural devices of today are not fully optimized. Nanostructured surfaces may improve electrical properties and lower evoked tissue responses. Vertical gallium phosphide (GaP) nanowires epitaxially grown from a GaP surface is one way of creating nanostructured electrodes. Thus, we chose to study the soft tissue reactions evoked by GaP surfaces. GaP and the control material titanium (Ti) were implanted in the rat abdominal wall for evaluation of tissue reactions after 1, 6, or 12 weeks. The foreign-body response was evaluated by measuring the reactive capsule thickness and by quantification of ED1-positive macrophages and total cells in the capsule. Furthermore, the concentration of Ga was measured in blood, brain, liver and kidneys. Statistically significant differences were noticed between GaP and Ti at 12 weeks for total and ED1-positive cell densities in the capsule. The chemical analysis showed that the concentration of Ga in brain, liver and kidneys increased during 12 weeks of implantation, indicating loss of Ga from the implant. Taken together, our results show that the biocompatible properties of GaP are worse than those of the well-documented biomaterial Ti.

[1]  R. Yokel,et al.  Dissimilar Aluminum and Gallium Permeation of the Blood‐Brain Barrier Demonstrated by In Vivo Microdialysis , 1992, Journal of neurochemistry.

[2]  K D Wise,et al.  Microfabrication techniques for integrated sensors and microsystems. , 1991, Science.

[3]  L. Bjursten,et al.  Implants in the abdominal wall of the rat. , 1986, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  D.R. Kipke,et al.  Implantable neural probe systems for cortical neuroprostheses , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  David C. Martin,et al.  Neuronal cell loss accompanies the brain tissue response to chronically implanted silicon microelectrode arrays , 2005, Experimental Neurology.

[6]  Jerald D. Kralik,et al.  Chronic, multisite, multielectrode recordings in macaque monkeys , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  R A Normann,et al.  The Utah intracortical Electrode Array: a recording structure for potential brain-computer interfaces. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  D. Kipke,et al.  Cortical microstimulation in auditory cortex of rat elicits best-frequency dependent behaviors , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[9]  Patrick A Tresco,et al.  The brain tissue response to implanted silicon microelectrode arrays is increased when the device is tethered to the skull. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[10]  Electrical properties of individual single-crystalline gallium phosphide nanowires with an outer oxide shell , 2004 .

[11]  Hongying Wang,et al.  A floating microwire technique for multichannel chronic neural recording and stimulation in the awake freely moving rat , 1997, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[12]  P. Thomsen,et al.  Immunohistochemical studies on the distribution of albumin, fibrinogen, fibronectin, IgG and collagen around PTFE and titanium implants. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[13]  Gabriel A. Silva,et al.  Neuroscience nanotechnology: progress, opportunities and challenges , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Normann,et al.  Chronic recording capability of the Utah Intracortical Electrode Array in cat sensory cortex , 1998, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  A. Tanaka,et al.  Toxicity of indium arsenide, gallium arsenide, and aluminium gallium arsenide. , 2004, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[16]  Justin C. Williams,et al.  Flexible polyimide-based intracortical electrode arrays with bioactive capability , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  D. Williams,et al.  Immune response in biocompatibility. , 1992, Biomaterials.

[18]  Jon A. Mukand,et al.  Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia , 2006, Nature.

[19]  P. Tresco,et al.  Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  A Tjellström,et al.  Electron microscopic observations on the soft tissue around clinical long-term percutaneous titanium implants. , 1995, Biomaterials.

[21]  D. Borton,et al.  A Brain Implantable Microsystem with Hybrid RF/IR Telemetry for Advanced Neuroengineering Applications , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[22]  L. Bjursten,et al.  Inflammatory reaction dependence on implant localization in rat soft tissue models. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[23]  T. Young,et al.  Assessment of GaN chips for culturing cerebellar granule neurons. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[24]  Lars Montelius,et al.  Gallium phosphide nanowires as a substrate for cultured neurons. , 2007, Nano letters.

[25]  Thomas Laurell,et al.  Tissue reactions evoked by porous and plane surfaces made out of silicon and titanium , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  L. Bjursten,et al.  Analysis of the inflammatory response to titanium and PTFE implants in soft tissue by macrophage phenotype quantification , 1998, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[27]  Bernice W. Polemis Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 1959 .

[28]  D. Kipke,et al.  Microstimulation in auditory cortex provides a substrate for detailed behaviors , 2005, Hearing Research.