Outage Scaling Laws and Diversity for Distributed Estimation Over Parallel Fading Channels

We consider scaling laws of the outage for distributed estimation problems over fading channels with respect to the total power and the number of sensors. Using a definition of diversity which involves a fixed number of sensors, we find tight upper and lower bounds on diversity which are shown to depend on the sensing (measurement) signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of the sensors. Our results indicate that the diversity order can be smaller than the number of sensors, and adding new sensors might not add to the diversity order depending on the sensing SNR of the added sensor. We treat a large class of envelope distributions for the wireless channel including those appropriate for line of sight scenarios. Finally, we consider fixed power per sensor with an asymptotically large number of sensors and show that the outage decays faster than exponentially in the number of sensors.

[1]  Thomas J. Goblick,et al.  Theoretical limitations on the transmission of data from analog sources , 1965, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[2]  J.E. Mazo,et al.  Digital communications , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  Lizhong Zheng,et al.  Diversity and multiplexing: a fundamental tradeoff in multiple-antenna channels , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[4]  Michael Gastpar,et al.  To code, or not to code: lossy source-channel communication revisited , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[5]  Georgios B. Giannakis,et al.  A simple and general parameterization quantifying performance in fading channels , 2003, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[6]  Michael Gastpar,et al.  Source-Channel Communication in Sensor Networks , 2003, IPSN.

[7]  Akbar M. Sayeed,et al.  Optimal Distributed Detection Strategies for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2004 .

[8]  Zhi-Quan Luo,et al.  Universal decentralized estimation in a bandwidth constrained sensor network , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[9]  G.B. Giannakis,et al.  Distributed compression-estimation using wireless sensor networks , 2006, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[10]  S. Marano,et al.  Quantizer Precision for Distributed Estimation in a Large Sensor Network , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[11]  Andrea J. Goldsmith,et al.  Power scheduling of universal decentralized estimation in sensor networks , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[12]  Cihan Tepedelenlioglu,et al.  WSN15-6: Practical Issues in Parameter Estimation over Fading Channels with TBMA Wireless Sensor Networks , 2006, IEEE Globecom 2006.

[13]  Lang Tong,et al.  Type based estimation over multiaccess channels , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[14]  Andrea J. Goldsmith,et al.  Estimation Diversity and Energy Efficiency in Distributed Sensing , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[15]  Ghassan Al-Regib,et al.  Rate-Constrained Distributed Estimation in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[16]  Mikael Skoglund,et al.  Distributed Scalar Quantizers for Noisy Channels , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - ICASSP '07.

[17]  Hongbin Li,et al.  Distributed Adaptive Quantization and Estimation for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[18]  Zhi-Quan Luo,et al.  Performance Bounds for the Rate-Constrained Universal Decentralized Estimators , 2007, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.