It Takes All Kinds in Acoustic Communication: A New Perspective on the Song Overlapping Phenomenon

Over the last few decades, research into song overlapping produced many – often conflicting – interpretations of its function and culminated in the current debate about the usefulness of this concept. To avoid a deadlock in song overlapping research, we present a new approach to existing evidence and offer several novel hypotheses that might help enhance future experiments. Our analysis offers both a theoretical perspective and specific predictions of each testable hypothesis. We present a detailed analysis of important questions. First, what information does song overlapping convey (is it a signal of aggressive intent or of male quality)? Second, what evolutionary mechanism stabilizes honesty of song overlapping as a signal (is it an index signal, handicap, proximity risk, conventional signal or a modifier)? Additionally, we offer some alternative explanations of the phenomenon (song overlapping as a mask or an incidental phenomenon). We hope to encourage future researchers not only to gather high-quality experimental data, but also to make more careful interpretations, as we believe that no all-encompassing explanation of song overlapping will be formulated any time soon. Focused comparative approaches will be necessary, as song overlapping might have different functions in different species.

[1]  T. Osiejuk,et al.  Nonpasserine bird produces soft calls and pays retaliation cost , 2011 .

[2]  M. Naguib,et al.  Vocal Interactions in Birds: The Use of Song as a Model in Communication , 2000 .

[3]  K. Otter,et al.  Habitat-induced changes in song consistency affect perception of social status in male chickadees , 2013, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[4]  S. Számadó,et al.  Honest and cheating strategies in a simple model of aggressive communication , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  M. Nagano,et al.  To Compensate or Not? Caring Parents Respond Differentially to Mate Removal and Mate Handicapping in the Burying Beetle, Nicrophorus quadripunctatus , 2009 .

[6]  Timothy Q. Gentner,et al.  The effect of auditory distractors on song discrimination in male canaries (Serinus canaria) , 2005, Behavioural Processes.

[7]  P. Ręk Corncrake males learn new signal meanings during aggressive interactions , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  G. Leboucher,et al.  Eavesdropping on Male Singing Interactions Leads to Differential Allocation in Eggs , 2010 .

[9]  D. Todt On Functions of Vocal Matching: Effect of Counter‐replies on Song Post Choice and Singing , 2010 .

[10]  D. Mennill,et al.  Overlapping and matching in the song contests of black-capped chickadees , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  William A. Searcy,et al.  Continued scepticism that song overlapping is a signal , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  S. Vehrencamp Is song–type matching a conventional signal of aggressive intentions? , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  Jeremy Hyman Countersinging as a signal of aggression in a territorial songbird , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  D. Todt,et al.  Temporal performance roles during vocal interactions in nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos B.) , 1982, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[15]  R. Planqué,et al.  Spectral overlap in songs and temporal overlap in a Peruvian bird assemblage , 2008 .

[16]  G. Leboucher,et al.  Is he all he says he is? Intersexual eavesdropping in the domestic canary, Serinus canaria , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  S. Számadó How threat displays work: species-specific fighting techniques, weaponry and proximity risk , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  P. McGregor,et al.  The signal function of overlapping singing in male robins , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  Marc Naguib,et al.  Chapter 1 Environmental Acoustics and the Evolution of Bird Song , 2009 .

[20]  M. Naguib,et al.  Effects of dyadic vocal interactions on other conspecific receivers in nightingales , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  James P. Higham,et al.  How does honest costly signaling work , 2014 .

[22]  M. Naguib Effects of song overlapping and alternating on nocturnally singing nightingales , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  Kurt M Fristrup,et al.  Accuracy of an acoustic location system for monitoring the position of duetting songbirds in tropical forest. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  M. Naguib,et al.  The day after: effects of vocal interactions on territory defence in nightingales. , 2007, The Journal of animal ecology.

[25]  Mike Mesterton-Gibbons,et al.  The cost of threat displays and the stability of deceptive communication , 1995 .

[26]  T. Osiejuk,et al.  Functionally similar acoustic signals in the corncrake (Crex crex) transmit information about different states of the sender during aggressive interactions , 2011, Hormones and Behavior.

[27]  C. Scharff,et al.  Does age matter in song bird vocal interactions? Results from interactive playback experiments , 2011, Frontiers in Zoology.

[28]  K. Oers,et al.  Singing Activity Reveals Personality Traits in Great Tits , 2010 .

[29]  J. Waas,et al.  'LAST WORD' EFFECTS OF MALE ADVERTISING CALLS ON FEMALE PREFERENCE IN LITTLE BLUE PENGUINS , 2002 .

[30]  M. Naguib,et al.  Effects of rapid broadband trills on responses to song overlapping in nightingales , 2010 .

[31]  M. Naguib,et al.  Communication across territory boundaries: distance-dependent responses in nightingales , 2010 .

[32]  M. Hall A review of hypotheses for the functions of avian duetting , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[33]  Jack W. Bradbury,et al.  Principles of Animal Communication , 1998 .

[34]  R. B. Payne Behavioral Continuity and Change in Local Song Populations of Village Indigobirds Vidua chalybeate , 1985 .

[35]  S. Peters,et al.  Brain development, song learning and mate choice in birds: a review and experimental test of the "nutritional stress hypothesis" , 2002, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[36]  T. Osiejuk,et al.  Sophistication and simplicity: conventional communication in a rudimentary system , 2010 .

[37]  M. Naguib,et al.  Vocal interactions in common nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos): males take it easy after pairing , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[38]  M. Webster,et al.  Montezuma oropendolas modify a component of song constrained by body size during vocal contests , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[39]  J. Podos,et al.  Escalation of aggressive vocal signals: a sequential playback study , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  M. Naguib,et al.  Nightingales respond more strongly to vocal leaders of simulated dyadic interactions , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  D. Mennill,et al.  Do male black-capped chickadees eavesdrop on song contests? A multi-speaker playback experiment , 2004 .

[42]  R. J. Robertson,et al.  Evidence for reliable badges of status in territorial yellow warblers (Dendroica petechia) , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  T. Guilford,et al.  What are conventional signals? , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[44]  S. Nowicki,et al.  The Evolution of Animal Communication: Reliability and Deception in Signaling Systems: Reliability and Deception in Signaling Systems , 2005 .

[45]  H. Richner,et al.  Long-term effects of early parasite exposure on song duration and singing strategy in great tits. , 2009 .

[46]  Anastasia H Dalziell,et al.  Song matching, overlapping, and switching in the banded wren: the sender's perspective. , 2007, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.

[47]  P. McGregor,et al.  RESPONSE OF GREAT TITS TO ESCALATING PATTERNS OF PLAYBACK , 2000 .

[48]  Marc Naguib,et al.  Effects of different levels of song overlapping on singing behaviour in male territorial nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos) , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[49]  T. Osiejuk,et al.  Signal value of alternating and overlapping singing in the Yellowhammer Emberiza citrinella , 2004, Journal of Ethology.

[50]  Marc Naguib,et al.  The signal value of birdsong: empirical evidence suggests song overlapping is a signal , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[51]  Daniel J. Mennill,et al.  Male chickadees match neighbors interactively at dawn: support for the social dynamics hypothesis , 2008 .

[52]  S. H. Hulse,et al.  Auditory scene analysis by songbirds: stream segregation of birdsong by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). , 1997, Journal of comparative psychology.

[53]  P. McGregor,et al.  Male great tits eavesdrop on simulated male–to–male vocal interactions , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  C. Darwin The descent of man, and Selection in relation to sex, Vol 1. , 1871 .

[55]  M. Naguib,et al.  Vocal interactions in nightingales, Luscinia megarhynchos: more aggressive males have higher pairing success , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[56]  C. Darwin The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex: INDEX , 1871 .

[57]  M. Hall,et al.  Overlapping signals in banded wrens: long-term effects of prior experience on males and females. , 2006, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.

[58]  C. Catchpole,et al.  Song as an indicator of parasitism in the sedge warbler , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[59]  A. Zahavi Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[60]  Manfred Gahr,et al.  The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits , 2002 .

[61]  David R. Wilson,et al.  Vocal signals predict attack during aggressive interactions in black-capped chickadees , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[62]  T. Guilford,et al.  The corruption of honest signalling , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[63]  Wolfgang Forstmeier,et al.  Constrained Performance in a Communication Network: Implications for the Function of Song‐Type Matching and for the Evolution of Multiple Ornaments , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[64]  S. Collins,et al.  Chapter 2 – Vocal fighting and flirting: the functions of birdsong , 2004 .

[65]  John M. Burt,et al.  Animal Communication Networks: Dawn chorus as an interactive communication network , 2005 .

[66]  Emma L. Brindley,et al.  Response of European robins to playback of song: neighbour recognition and overlapping , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[67]  Hans Slabbekoorn,et al.  Timing vocal behaviour: Experimental evidence for song overlap avoidance in Eurasian wrens , 2014, Behavioural Processes.

[68]  D. Todt,et al.  Memory-dependent adjustment of vocal response latencies in a territorial songbird , 2013, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[69]  Jeffrey Podos,et al.  Shift of song frequencies in response to masking tones , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[70]  Erin R. B. Eldermire,et al.  The deterrent effect of bird song in territory defense. , 2009, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.

[71]  J. Bradbury,et al.  The energetic cost of display in male sage grouse , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[72]  D. Penn,et al.  Mate Choice for Genetic Benefits: Time to Put the Pieces Together , 2010 .

[73]  M. Théry,et al.  Female canary mate preferences: differential use of information from two types of male–male interaction , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[74]  P. McGregor,et al.  Is the signal value of overlapping different from that of alternating during matched singing in Great Tits , 1996 .

[75]  J. Bradbury,et al.  Principles of animal communication, 2nd ed. , 2011 .

[76]  William A. Searcy,et al.  Song as an aggressive signal in songbirds , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[77]  T. Osiejuk,et al.  Corn bunting (Miliaria calandra) males respond differently to alternating and overlapping playback of song , 2007, Journal of Ethology.

[78]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? , 1982, Science.

[79]  M. E. Laidre,et al.  Is bird song a reliable signal of aggressive intent? , 2008, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[80]  J. Hailman,et al.  Temporal Pattern Shifts to Avoid Acoustic Interference in Singing Birds , 1974, Science.

[81]  L. Eberhardt,et al.  OXYGEN CONSUMPTION DURING SINGING BY MALE CAROLINA WRENS (THRYOTHORUS LUDOVICIANUS) , 1994 .

[82]  Daniel J. Mennill,et al.  Frequency matching, overlapping and movement behaviour in diurnal countersinging interactions of black-capped chickadees , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[83]  P. Slater,et al.  Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations , 1995 .

[84]  Kara-Anne A. Ward,et al.  Calling in an acoustically competitive environment: duetting male long-tailed manakins avoid overlapping neighbours but not playback-simulated rivals , 2012, Animal Behaviour.