Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics, and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities

This article argues that a common pattern and set of dynamics characterizes severe political and societal polarization in different contexts around the world, with pernicious consequences for democracy. Moving beyond the conventional conceptualization of polarization as ideological distance between political parties and candidates, we offer a conceptualization of polarization highlighting its inherently relational nature and its instrumental political use. Polarization is a process whereby the normal multiplicity of differences in a society increasingly align along a single dimension and people increasingly perceive and describe politics and society in terms of “Us” versus “Them.” The politics and discourse of opposition and the social–psychological intergroup conflict dynamics produced by this alignment are a main source of the risks polarization generates for democracy, although we recognize that it can also produce opportunities for democracy. We argue that contemporary examples of polarization follow a frequent pattern whereby polarization is activated when major groups in society mobilize politically to achieve fundamental changes in structures, institutions, and power relations. Hence, newly constructed cleavages are appearing that underlie polarization and are not easily measured with the conventional Left–Right ideological scale. We identify three possible negative outcomes for democracy—“gridlock and careening,” “democratic erosion or collapse under new elites and dominant groups,” and “democratic erosion or collapse with old elites and dominant groups,” and one possible positive outcome—“reformed democracy.” Drawing on literature in psychology and political science, the article posits a set of causal mechanisms linking polarization to harm to democracy and illustrates the common patterns and pernicious consequences for democracy in four country cases: varying warning signs of democratic erosion in Hungary and the United States, and growing authoritarianism in Turkey and Venezuela.

[1]  Berk Esen,et al.  A Small Yes for Presidentialism: The Turkish Constitutional Referendum of April 2017 , 2017, The AKP Since Gezi Park.

[2]  Kathleen Blee The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. By Katherine J. Cramer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016. Pp. xxi+285. $30.00 (paper). , 2019, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  Jennifer McCoy,et al.  Mass Partisan Polarization: Measuring a Relational Concept , 2018 .

[4]  A. LeBas Can Polarization Be Positive? Conflict and Institutional Development in Africa , 2018 .

[5]  S. Handlin The Logic of Polarizing Populism: State Crises and Polarization in South America , 2018 .

[6]  G. Ball,et al.  Behave: The biology of humans at our best and worst Robert M. Sapolsky Behave: The biology of humans at our best , 2017, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  E. Schickler,et al.  Partisan Hearts and Minds , 2017 .

[8]  S. Morgan,et al.  The White Working Class and Voter Turnout in U.S. Presidential Elections, 2004 to 2016 , 2017 .

[9]  S. Handlin State Crisis in Fragile Democracies: Polarization and Political Regimes in South America , 2017 .

[10]  Matt Motyl Liberals and Conservatives are (Geographically) Dividing , 2017 .

[11]  K. Laurin,et al.  Hypocritical Flip-Flop, or Courageous Evolution? When Leaders Change Their Moral Minds , 2017, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  M. Schudson,et al.  The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker , 2017 .

[13]  T. Ryan No Compromise: Political Consequences of Moralized Attitudes , 2017 .

[14]  Senem Aydin. Düzgit,et al.  Turkey after the July 15th Coup attempt: when elites polarize over polarization , 2017 .

[15]  K. Öktem,et al.  Exit from democracy: illiberal governance in Turkey and beyond , 2016 .

[16]  Murat Somer Understanding Turkey’s democratic breakdown: old vs. new and indigenous vs. global authoritarianism , 2016, Exit from Democracy.

[17]  James E. Campbell Polarized: Making Sense of a Divided America , 2016 .

[18]  M. Tesler Post-Racial or Most-Racial?: Race and Politics in the Obama Era , 2016 .

[19]  A. Abramowitz,et al.  The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century , 2016 .

[20]  Sebnem Gumuscu,et al.  Rising competitive authoritarianism in Turkey , 2016 .

[21]  J. Thurber,et al.  American Gridlock: The Sources, Character, and Impact of Political Polarization , 2016 .

[22]  Z. Enyedi Populist Polarization and Party System Institutionalization , 2016 .

[23]  S. Iyengar E Pluribus Pluribus, or Divided We Stand , 2016 .

[24]  Matthew Levendusky,et al.  Mis)perceptions of Partisan Polarization in the American Public , 2016 .

[25]  R. Lau,et al.  Candidate Extremity, Information Environments, and Affective Polarization: Three Experiments Using Dynamic Process Tracing , 2016 .

[26]  J. Knuckey,et al.  Racial Resentment, Old-Fashioned Racism, and the Vote Choice of Southern and Nonsouthern Whites in the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election* , 2015 .

[27]  A. Abramowitz The New American Electorate: Partisan, Sorted, and Polarized , 2015 .

[28]  J. Stonecash,et al.  Polarization and the Politics of Personal Responsibility , 2015 .

[29]  Noam Lupu,et al.  Party Polarization and Mass Partisanship: A Comparative Perspective , 2015 .

[30]  J. Hacker,et al.  Solutions to Political Polarization in America: Confronting Asymmetric Polarization , 2015 .

[31]  L. Diamond Facing Up to the Democratic Recession , 2015 .

[32]  N. Persily,et al.  American Political Parties: Exceptional No More , 2015 .

[33]  Lilliana Mason,et al.  “I Disrespectfully Agree”: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization , 2015 .

[34]  Elizabeth J. Zechmeister,et al.  The Latin American Voter: Pursuing Representation and Accountability in Challenging Contexts , 2015 .

[35]  A. Abramowitz,et al.  All Politics is National: The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of U.S. House and Senate Elections in the 21 st Century , 2015 .

[36]  M. Lozada Us or Them? Social Representations and Imaginaries of the Other in Venezuela , 2014 .

[37]  Nancy D. Erbe International Mediation in Venezuela , 2014 .

[38]  Gabrielle Lynch From Protest to Parties: Party-building and democratization in Africa , 2014 .

[39]  F. Vegetti From political conflict to partisan evaluations: How citizens assess party ideology and competence in polarized elections , 2014 .

[40]  Murat Somer Moderation of religious and secular politics, a country's “centre” and democratization , 2014 .

[41]  S. Iyengar,et al.  Affect, Not Ideology A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization , 2012 .

[42]  Milan W. Svolik The Politics of Authoritarian Rule , 2012 .

[43]  H. Morgenthau The Concept of the Political , 2012 .

[44]  John V. Duca,et al.  Has income inequality or media fragmentation increased political polarization , 2012 .

[45]  Hahrie Han,et al.  The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy , 2011 .

[46]  A. LeBas From Protest to Parties , 2011 .

[47]  John Coggin,et al.  The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism , 2011, Perspectives on Politics.

[48]  György Lengyel,et al.  Hungary: Between Consolidated And Simulated Democracy , 2010 .

[49]  Matthew Levendusky The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans , 2009 .

[50]  Christopher W. Bauman,et al.  Limits on legitimacy: moral and religious convictions as constraints on deference to authority. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  A.M.J. Derks Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections , 2009 .

[52]  Thomas F. Pettigrew,et al.  How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta‐analytic tests of three mediators , 2008 .

[53]  Z. Enyedi The Social and Attitudinal Basis of Political Parties: Cleavage Politics Revisited , 2008, European Review.

[54]  M. Fiorina,et al.  Political Polarization in the American Public , 2008 .

[55]  Bill Bishop,et al.  The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America Is Tearing Us Apart , 2008 .

[56]  Morris P. Fiorina,et al.  Southern Political Science Association Polarization in the American Public : Misconceptions and Misreadings , 2011 .

[57]  N. Letki Does Diversity Erode Social Cohesion? Social Capital and Race in British Neighbourhoods , 2008 .

[58]  Gerald Schneider,et al.  Polarization and Conflict: Theoretical and Empirical Issues , 2008 .

[59]  Russell J. Dalton The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems , 2008 .

[60]  A. Gelman,et al.  Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion. , 2008, AJS; American journal of sociology.

[61]  S. Levin,et al.  The dynamics of political polarization , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  A. Lebas,et al.  Polarization as Craft: Party Formation and State Violence in Zimbabwe , 2006 .

[63]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[64]  Z. Enyedi Party Politics in Post-Communist Transition , 2006 .

[65]  M. Shugart The Unraveling of Representative Democracy in Venezuela , 2005, Perspectives on Politics.

[66]  Murat Somer Failures of the Discourse of Ethnicity: Turkey, Kurds, and the Emerging Iraq , 2005 .

[67]  Jose G Montalvo,et al.  Ethnic Polarization, Potential Conflict, and Civil Wars , 2004 .

[68]  Matthew E. Kahn,et al.  Understanding the American Decline in Social Capital, 1952-1998 , 2003 .

[69]  Debraj Ray,et al.  Polarization: Concepts, Measurement, Estimation , 2003 .

[70]  L. Skitka Do the Means Always Justify the Ends, or Do the Ends Sometimes Justify the Means? A Value Protection Model of Justice Reasoning , 2002 .

[71]  Marc J. Hetherington,et al.  Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization , 2001, American Political Science Review.

[72]  Richard G. Niemi,et al.  Controversies in Voting Behavior , 2001 .

[73]  S. Chakravarty,et al.  INEQUALITY, POLARISATION AND WELFARE: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS , 2001 .

[74]  R. Kanbur,et al.  What Difference Do Polarisation Measures Make? An Application to China , 2001, Journal of Development Studies.

[75]  Murat Somer,et al.  Cascades of Ethnic Polarization: Lessons from Yugoslavia , 2001 .

[76]  Joshua D. Greene Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them , 2001 .

[77]  Youqiang Wang,et al.  Polarization Orderings and New Classes of Polarization Indices , 2000 .

[78]  S. Greene Understanding Party Identification: A Social Identity Approach , 1999 .

[79]  A. Alesina,et al.  Participation in Heterogeneous Communities , 1999 .

[80]  M. Brewer The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate? , 1999 .

[81]  P. Zak,et al.  Trust and Growth , 1998 .

[82]  D. Rodrik Where Did All the Growth Go? External Shocks, Social Conflict, and Growth Collapses , 1998 .

[83]  Danny Quah,et al.  Empirics for Growth and Distribution: Stratification, Polarization, and Convergence Clubs , 1997 .

[84]  A. Alesina,et al.  Public Goods and Ethnic Divisions , 1997 .

[85]  K. T. Poole,et al.  Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting , 1997 .

[86]  Michael X. Delli Carpini,et al.  Measuring Political Knowledge: Putting First Things First , 1993 .

[87]  Phyllis A. Anastasio,et al.  The Common Ingroup Identity Model: Recategorization and the Reduction of Intergroup Bias , 1993 .

[88]  Debraj Ray,et al.  On the Measurement of Polarization , 1994 .

[89]  R. Inglehart Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society , 1991 .

[90]  Károly Mészáros Hungary. , 1988, Revue scientifique et technique.

[91]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[92]  A. King,et al.  Nixon, Agnew, and the “silent majority”: A case study in the rhetoric of polarization , 1971 .

[93]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Experiments in intergroup discrimination. , 1970, Scientific American.

[94]  A. Downs An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy , 1957, Journal of Political Economy.

[95]  E. Bogardus Making social science studies , 1925 .